Anthony Weiner admits to online relationships, sending explicit photo; says he will not step down
Updated 6:46 p.m. Eastern Time
A teary Rep. Anthony Weiner apologized on Monday for having "inappropriate" telephone and email conversations with six women over three years, though he said he did not break any laws and would not step down.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi immediately called for an investigation of Weiner's actions.
The New York lawmaker admitted he posted a photograph of his bulging crotch on Twitter, saying he had lied when he previously characterized the photograph as a prank.
"The picture was of me, and I sent it," he said.
He also said he had several "inappropriate conversations" that he described as "explicit in nature" with half a dozen other women over three years - including after he married his wife, Huma Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. He said he had not met any of the women.
U.S. Congressman Anthony Weiner, D-NY, wipes his eye during a news conference in New York, Monday, June 6, 2011.
/ AP Photo/Richard Drew"If you're looking for some kind of deep explanation for this, I don't have one except to say that I'm very sorry," he said.
Weiner said he and his wife "have no intension of splitting up over this" and that he had not had sex outside of year-old marriage.
"I love her very much, and she loves me," he said, adding: "I am deeply sorry for the pain this has caused my wife Huma, and my family." Weiner called his wife "a remarkable woman."
"She's not responsible for any of this," he said. "This was visited upon her. She's getting back to work, and I apologize to her very deeply."
Weiner, who appeared in a ballroom at a New York City hotel, said he sent the initial photograph as "part of a joke," and that he deleted it in a panic after he realized it had been sent to the public. He said his decision to lie to the public was a mistake.
"I was trying to protect my wife, I was trying to protect myself from shame, and I really regret it," he said. He said she knew about some of the online relationships before they were married.
Weiner, who before the scandal was seen as leading candidate to become the mayor of New York City, said he did not believe he had broken the law and planned to keep his job on Congress.
"I'm not resigning, and I'm going to try very hard to go back to work a better man and a better husband too," he said.
Added Weiner: "I am sorry, and I continue to be, but I don't see anything that I did that violates any rule of the House. I don't see anything I did that certainly violated my oath of office."
The House Code of Conduct reads in part, "A Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee of the House shall behave at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House."
Pelosi called for an investigation shortly after Weiner's statement.
"I am deeply disappointed and saddened about this situation; for Anthony's wife, Huma, his family, his staff and his constituents," she said. "I am calling for an Ethics Committee investigation to determine whether any official resources were used or any other violation of House rules occurred."
Breitbart said in a statement following Pelosi's comments that he welcomes and "will fully cooperate with an investigation by the House Ethics Committee."
The Ethics Committee would not immediately say whether it was opening an investigation into Weiner's actions, though it was expected to do so.
Weiner could be expelled from the House if two-thirds of members vote to do so. The House has only done so five times in its history, including three expulsions for disloyalty to the union. Weiner could also face censure -- a strong reprimand that requires a simple majority vote. There's no formal consequence to this action, but the member could lose chairmanships and seniority. A less serious punishment would be a formal reprimand of the sort given to Rep. Joe Wilson after his "You Lie" outburst.
Weiner said doesn't believe he used government resources in sending the messages, and that his staff did not know he had done so.
He said he did not know the ages of all the women to whom he had sent messages, saying, "they're all adults, at least to the best of my knowledge."
CBS
"I know that I never had any intention to have any interaction with underage women," he added, telling reporters that "I never met these women and never had much desire to."
Asked about future use of his Twitter account, Weiner said: "I don't believe I'll use it the same way, that's for sure."
Conservative publisher Andrew Breitbart published a series of alleged photographs of the congressman Monday that he said Weiner emailed to an unidentified young woman, including a shirtless photograph. In addition, tabloid website RadarOnline.com posted a sexually explicit Facebook exchange allegedly involving Weiner and an unidentified woman that the website claimed took place in March.
And Weiner's admission came as ABC News prepared to release an interview with 26-year-old Meagan Broussard, who provided the news outlet with "photos, emails, Facebook messages and cell phone call logs that she says chronicle a sexually-charged electronic relationship with Weiner that rapidly-evolved for more than a month, starting on April 20, 2011."
Last week, a photograph appeared in Weiner's Twitter feed showing a bulging crotch in grey underwear. Weiner said the photograph was "a prank, a hoax" but did not deny that the picture was of him. Breitbart alleges that Weiner used a personal Yahoo email account to send that same photo to another woman.
Breitbart made a surprise appearance at Weiner's press conference before it began, saying he was there "coincidentally" after he had been set to be interviewed nearby. (He was asked to take the podium by reporters present for the event after speaking to a small group in the back of the room.) He said he has "at least one more photo" of Weiner, which he describes as "x-rated," though he said in response to a question from CBS News that he does not intend to release it because he wanted to "save his family."
"I'm trying to do the decent thing and not release the photo," he added, though he suggested he could reconsider depending on Weiner's comments and actions going forward.
"I've seen a lot of the congressman's body," said Breitbart, who answered questions for about 12 minutes. "He is in very good shape."
Breitbart asked Weiner and members of the liberal blogosphere to apologize "for a blame the messenger strategy" in the wake of the release of the initial photo. (Weiner apologized to Breitbart, among others, in the press conference.) Breitbart also complained that the mainstream media has repeatedly questioned his credibility over his role in edited video controversies involving Shirley Sherrod and the ACORN undercover stings.
"I'm here for some vindication," he said. Appearing exasperated, Breitbart denied he was out for any sort of revenge and seemed incredulous that his motives were being questioned.
Nancy Pelosi calls for ethics investigation of Anthony Weiner after congressman admits photo was him
Andrew Breitbart makes surprise appearance at Anthony Weiner's press conference
Popular in Politics
- FBI director acknowledges domestic drone use 127 Comments
- Obama and Berlin: Faded echoes meet new realities 69 Comments
- Smooth, on-time Obamacare rollout no sure thing: GAO
- Obama on NSA programs: Americans "not getting the complete story"
- House Republicans pass 20-week limit on abortions 464 Comments
- Immigration reform would cut deficit, analysis shows 79 Comments
- GOP Sen. Murkowski backs same-sex marriage
- Obama renews push for a nuclear disarmament legacy
The rest of it does not matter compared to that. Plain and simple.
I guess it is OK to be a slimebag if you are a Republicon, huh?
Well, if weiner came clean, then there's no point in putting weiner through a wringer or demanding weiner pull out.
Just remember, a contrite weiner is far better than no weiner at all.
-------
At the heart of the issue is a number of expenses that Mr. Breitbart claimed on his 2008-2009 Federal Income Tax returns where among other things he had claimed expenses relating to work for 2 New York City sex clubs. During the Period of 2008-2009 Mr. Breitbart claimed $7,294 in work expenses for money spent at The West Side Club and Love, both famous high end sex clubs in the city.
Mr. Breitbart claimed that he expenses were incurred as part of research for an upcoming article for work and were therefor tax deductible.
An IRS agent who wished to remain anonymous said "while there are all sorts of expenses related to work that can be claimed, being tied up and having wax poured on your nipples is a bridge too far." When the IRS was contacted for comment on this story they said "we are not allowed to comment on any ongoing investigations"
Among other expenses under investigation there were a number of questionable items including; anal beads, nipple clamps, various types of lube and a video, Star ******.
Mr. Brietbart contends that all of these expenses are legitimate and are part of an upcoming expose on the New York City underground sex scene. If convicted of the charges Mr. Breitbart faces up to 15 years in prison and $15,000 in fines.
"It is the age old DC story, the people who scream the loudest about morality are always the ones who are secretly doing the most nefarious deeds in some back alley" said an anonymous congressional source.
Where this investigation goes is yet to be seen, but what is clear is that our country faces serious problems, and spending 2 weeks complaining about something a congressman did that most american men have, that broke no laws and hurt no one is something that we simply do not have time for. We have millions of unemployed Americans, a rising debt and all sorts of problems. Perhaps focusing on a Congressman who is guilty of nothing but flirting online is not the best use of our time.
I guess it is Ok to be a sexual wacko, depraved pervert as long as you are a Republicon.
http://thetop10.squarespace.com/the-politics-of-it-all/2011/6/7/andrew-breitbart-under-investigation-for-tax-fraud.html
-------
At the heart of the issue is a number of expenses that Mr. Breitbart claimed on his 2008-2009 Federal Income Tax returns where among other things he had claimed expenses relating to work for 2 New York City sex clubs. During the Period of 2008-2009 Mr. Breitbart claimed $7,294 in work expenses for money spent at The West Side Club and Love, both famous high end sex clubs in the city.
Mr. Breitbart claimed that he expenses were incurred as part of research for an upcoming article for work and were therefor tax deductible.
An IRS agent who wished to remain anonymous said "while there are all sorts of expenses related to work that can be claimed, being tied up and having wax poured on your nipples is a bridge too far." When the IRS was contacted for comment on this story they said "we are not allowed to comment on any ongoing investigations"
Among other expenses under investigation there were a number of questionable items including; anal beads, nipple clamps, various types of lube and a video, Star ******.
Mr. Brietbart contends that all of these expenses are legitimate and are part of an upcoming expose on the New York City underground sex scene. If convicted of the charges Mr. Breitbart faces up to 15 years in prison and $15,000 in fines.
"It is the age old DC story, the people who scream the loudest about morality are always the ones who are secretly doing the most nefarious deeds in some back alley" said an anonymous congressional source.
Where this investigation goes is yet to be seen, but what is clear is that our country faces serious problems, and spending 2 weeks complaining about something a congressman did that most american men have, that broke no laws and hurt no one is something that we simply do not have time for. We have millions of unemployed Americans, a rising debt and all sorts of problems. Perhaps focusing on a Congressman who is guilty of nothing but flirting online is not the best use of our time.