Mitt Romney: Humans contribute to global warming
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney announces his candidacy for the Republican presidential nomination June 2, 2011 at Bittersweet Farm in Stratham, New Hampshire.
/ Darren McCollesterRepublican presidential candidate Mitt Romney broke with many in his party on Friday when he said he believes humans have contributed to global warming.
"I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that," said at a New Hampshire town hall meeting, according to Reuters.
There is widespread consensus within the scientific community that the earth warming and that human beings are at least partially responsible. But many Republicans dispute that conclusion, including Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
Inhofe has suggested that global warming is a hoax that "started in the United Nations and the ones in the United States who really grab a hold of this is the Hollywood elite."
Romney reportedly said Friday that he believed the United States as well as foreign nations need to "reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases," saying they "may be significant contributors" to climate change.
As Reuters notes, one of 2012 GOP Romney's rivals, former House speaker Newt Gingrich, said last week that the push to address climate change is "the newest excuse to take control of lives" by "left-wing intellectuals." Gingrich had previously suggested that "our country must take action on climate change."
Gingrich is not the only Republican presidential contender to shift on climate change issues. Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman said in 2007 that "it's time for Congress to act by capping greenhouse gas pollution," but he now says it isn't the time to address the issue. And former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has backed off his previous support for cap-and-trade energy legislation, saying he had been wrong in once calling for a cap on carbon emissions.
Popular in Politics
- Obama prom pictures surface
- Obama: America at a "crossroads" in fighting terrorism
- Drones, Gitmo part of broad Obama counterterrorism speech
- Lawmakers push to punish sexual offenders in the military
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave
- Boehner calls out Obama administration's "arrogance of power" 85 Comments
- Protester heckles Obama during counterterrorism speech Play Video
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 958 Comments














"20,000 after those nukes go off )a mere eye-blink in the grands scheme) the Earth will be exactly as it was before they went off."
People simply don't have the necessary knowledge to understand these issues. 20,000 years after a global nuclear war this planet will be a totally sterile piece of barren rock with about 2% of the atmospheric pressure we have now. Unless bacteria drop in from outer space there is no chance that any living organism would survive a nuclear world war. At the 20,000 year mark the Earth would be identical to Mars with no oxygen, no liquid water, and NO life of any kind which originated on Earth, with absolutely no hope of any new life forms evolving here.
I could not possibly care less whether or not human activity is contributing to global warming. The fact is that global warming is happening, and if it continues, it will result in the extinction of the human race, or a massive die off and a return to prehistoric living conditions. I don't care if chipmunks, rabbits, squids, or whales manage to survive. If there are no humans left then the world is dead. Whatever the cause, global warming must be stopped. Anyone who thinks we haven't, and can't, significantly change the whole bloody world is delusional, ignorant, and/or stupid. Wake up and smell the poison! You live on a dieing planet. Disbelief wont change that!
Believing that would not hurt and probably destroy the Earth - simple arrogance.