Gingrich slams GOP Medicare plan despite the fact he once said he'd vote for it
Updated: 12:53 p.m. ET
As Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich gears up this week for a 17-city campaign tour of Iowa, he's taking heat from the GOP for knocking Wis. Rep. Paul Ryan's plan for Medicare - which the former House Speaker decried on Sunday as "right-wing social engineering."
Gingrich, speaking in an interview on "Meet the Press" on Sunday, argued that the GOP plan for Medicare as outlined in Ryan's proposed 2012 budget was a "radical change" and that we "need a national conversation to get to a better Medicare solution for seniors."
"I'm against Obamacare, which is imposing radical change, and I would be against a conservative imposing radical change," Gingrich told NBC's David Gregory. "I don't think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering... I don't think imposing radical change from the right or the left is a very good way for a free society to operate."
Gingrich, who officially announced his entrance into the 2012 presidential campaign last week, offered that "we need a national conversation to get to a better Medicare system with more choices for seniors," and argued that the first step was eliminating fraud within the system.
"Between Medicare and Medicaid, we pay between $70 billion and $120 billion a year to crooks," Gingrich said. "And IBM has agreed to help solve it, American Express has agreed to help solve it, Visa's agreed to help solve it. You can't get anybody in this town to look at it. That's, that's almost $1 trillion over a decade."
Ryan's overhaul, Gingrich argued, "is too big a jump."
"I think what you want to have is a system where people voluntarily migrate to better outcomes, better solutions, better options," he said.
But Gingrich's Sunday statements reflect apparent inconsistencies in his position on Medicare: Time Magazine reports that Gingrich just weeks ago told reporters he would vote for Ryan's plan.
"Sure," Gingrich told Time reporter Jay Newton-Small, when questioned on whether he would vote for the plan.
"Do you think it would actually save the health care system?" Newton-Small asked Gingrich.
"No, I think it's the first step," he replied. "You need an entirely new set of solutions."
In a Facebook message posted shortly after his interview with Time, Gingrich espoused support for a plan that would, unlike Ryan's, "allow seniors to choose, on a voluntary basis, a more personal system with greater options for better care."
Some interpreted that message as an indicator of his support for the Rivlin-Domenici Medicare plan, which would make Medicare a premium support system while allowing seniors to purchase private insurance plans with the use of subsidies.
In an apparent attempt to walk back the former speaker's Sunday statements, Gingrich spokesman Rick Tyler told the Weekly Standard later that day that Gingrich's comments on "Meet the Press" were being blown out of proportion - and that, substantively, there was "little daylight" between Ryan's plan and Gingrich's position.
"There is little daylight between Ryan and Gingrich," he wrote. "But look how it gets reported. Newt would fully support Ryan if it were not compulsory. We need to design a better system that people will voluntarily move to. That is a major difference in design but not substance."
"Radical means that politically you can't get to what Ryan wants from where we are," Tyler added. "It will be demagogued to death. Right wing social engineer refers simply to compelling people to participate without giving them a choice. That is a political mistake."
Ryan hit back at Gingrich on Monday in a radio interview with Raymond Arroyo, guest host of Laura Ingraham's conservative radio show.
"With allies like that, who needs the left?" he said, according to the Hill.
Ryan disputed Gingrich's characterization of his plan for Medicare: "Hardly is that social engineering and radical," he said. "What's radical is kicking the can down the road."
In a statement on Monday, GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum said Gingrich's comments reflected "a big departure from [his] often sound policy proposals," and praised Ryan's plan.
"Contrary to what Speaker Gingrich said yesterday, the Ryan plan does not 'suddenly impose' 'radical change,'" Santorum said. "Paul Ryan's plan is the first serious step by our new Congress to empower future seniors with more choices while at the same time keeping the Medicare system solvent and reigning [sic] in out-of-control federal spending."
Gingrich will speak at Dubuque's Kiwanis Club on Monday in the first stop of his Iowa campaign tour.
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 193 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 359 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups 70 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 419 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 335 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare 47 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016
Alert: All Citizens Of The United States. The American public is being gouged by Big Oil and the reason they are able to do this is because they have no competition. These little web sites that TV stations put up to immediately lead you to the cheapest price in town is the joke of the century. The cheapest price you might be able to find is only a few cents less than all other gas stations. I know Big Oil does not price fix. How do I know they don't price fix, because they say they don't (Ha Ha Ha). What I don't understand is that when the prices at one oil company go up, somehow mysteriously all the other oil companies prices go up at the same time, I can't explain it, I suppose it must be magic. The only way to bring down the price of gasoline is to create competition and the only way to do this is look at the whole ball game from a different perspective. As American Citizens, we own all federal land and there is enough petroleum on these lands to provide America with gasoline for the next three centuries (and we the Citizens of the United States own the oil on that federal land). All the territorial waters of the United States are owned by the American Citizens and this includes the oil rich gulf (and the oil in these territories). America is in great debt right now and a lot of our jobs have gone overseas and the merciless Big Oil companies are setting there like vultures and increasing the price at the pump every day. It seems our politicians are afraid of Big Oil and are very reluctant to force them to drop the price. I don't understand this because we elected them to represent the Citizens of the United States, but it seems they are more interested in representing and protecting Big Oil. I know these are honorable people and they wouldn't take any favors from Big Oil in exchange for their reluctance to pounce on them (Ha Ha Ha). Oh they will put up a show from time to time and claim to be investigating Big Oil for price fixing and the price of gasoline may drop a few cents at a time maybe even a half dollar and then the politicians strut around as if they have really restrained "Big Oil" (Ha Ha Ha). The answer to price gouging lies within the officials which will be elected by the Tea Party, Democrats and Republicans. We need candidates whom are not bought and paid for by Big Oil and Really have best interest of the Citizens of the United States in mind. The solution to Big Oil price gouging is competition which they currently do not have. Since the Citizens of the United States already own the oil in the territorial waters of the gulf and on federal lands, it is time for the United States government to come to the call of the people which are by the way its bosses. It is time to drill in territorial waters of the gulf and on government lands and use this oil to put gasoline stations owned by the Citizens of the United States in each town which will offer petroleum at much lower rates and give the Big Oil monopoly the competition they do not currently have. This revenue will also be used to pay off the United States debt. Send this to message every Tea Party, Democrat and Republican Candidate hoping to get elected in your district. Also send it to every friend, family member and acquaintance you know. Even-though it probably won't do any good also send it to your current honorable congressman and senators.
Tired of being robbed at the gas pump!!!!
PS: Tell them we want to drill on Federal Lands and in Territorial Waters of the United States which is owned by the Citizens Of The United States. We want Citizen Owned petroleum and gas stations in each town and we want them Now!!!
I just woke up and found out that Newt is a Democrat!
Does Hillary have some dirt on him or something?
I have surveyed every sitting Republican Senator and Governor for new prospects. I suggest Michele Bachmann, Jim Demint, Jim Hoeven, Mark Kirk, Mike Lee (VP), Lisa Murkowski, Tim Pawlenty, and Rob Portman so far. There may be other candidates and I have not exactly finished. First, I qualified them by age. Ron Pau is 75 now, how he going to hold up in 8 years? We have all seen the pictures of presidents before and after pictures. The job takes a heavy toll. I've marked Mike Lee as VP because he is a little young and a little inexperien?ced for a Presidenti?al run, but after 8 years as VP he would be a good follow through candidate. I then looked at their experience and any controvers?ial issues I could easily find on the 'net. These guys look good. There could be more I have not exhausted my research. But start with these guys. If you don't think they can't generate the funding, let's just all settle on one and fund him.
Please don't give any credence to the negative comments. They are written by democrats as a weapon in their battle to put a communist in charge again. Negative posts about republican candidate report it, but don't reply to it. Submit a new post that way they won't get an email response and respond to your post with more negativity.
All we need is another Obama/McCain choice...
booo
All democrats have is Obama and he's proven himself to be inept at business leadership. He can kill, but other than that...nothin.