House GOP seeks money to defend gay marriage ban
CBS/ AP
The Defense of Marriage Act, the 15-year-old federal law that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman, is facing a legal challenge in New York today. Traditionally the federal government defends challenges to federal law, but not in this case - after defending it for two years, the Obama administration announced in February it would no longer defend the law because it believes it is unconstitutional.
That decision left House Republicans, who largely oppose same-sex marriage, without "any choice" but to step in and defend the law, in the words of House Speaker John Boehner. Boehner says "only the courts are in the position of defending the constitutionality of any bill."
Boehner is reportedly poised to hire a prominent GOP lawyer to defend DOMA's constitutionality. That lawyer would be just one of the costs associated with defending DOMA. So where would the money come from? According to Boehner, funds for defending DOMA should be diverted from the Department of Justice.
"Obviously, [the Department of Justice's] decision results in DOJ no longer needing the funds it would have otherwise expended defending the constitutionality of DOMA," he wrote on a letter released Monday. "It is my intent that those funds be diverted to the House for reimbursement of any costs incurred by and associated with the House, and not DOJ, defending DOMA."
Boehner's letter was addressed to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who is among the Democrats who have raised concerns about the cost of the House defending the law. It is not clear how much money Boehner would seek from DOJ, which has said in the past there is not a specific funding allocation for defending the law.
"I would welcome your joining me in support of redirecting those resources from the DOJ to the House that would otherwise have been necessary expenses on the Attorney General to defend this federal statute," wrote Boehner.
Boehner's appeal may largely be symbolic, since the Democrat-led Senate would have to approve the diversion of DOJ funds to the House - an unlikely prospect.
DOMA, which has been a target of gay rights advocates for years, keeps gay and lesbian married couples from receiving tax benefits afforded to opposite-sex couples.
On Friday, the House Judiciary Committee held a "Defending Marriage" hearing to examine the administration's decision not to defend DOMA. Many Republicans said the decision was wrongheaded; Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that "[n]o one can seriously believe that the Constitution's authors intended to create a right to same-sex marriage."
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 437 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 105 Comments
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 129 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 208 Comments
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 211 Comments
The Republicans finally create employment for one person - a lawyer.
Now they are asking Democrats to pay his salary with tax dollars.
There are gays in Congress.
Why do you care if gays marry.?
Most gays are lawabiding productive citizens,
While people who are against gay marriage are entitled to freedom of speech when it comes to voicing the opinions, I have never seen any provision in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights that gives them the right to shove their opinions down someone elses throat by enacting a law to get their way.
While I don't think gays should be married in religious ceremonies, the should be allowed to marry in civil ceremonies.
Not granting gays to receive the same benefits as those who marry in religious ceremonies is "DISCRIMINATION". and I always thought there were already laws on the books to prohibit this.
Again, mind your business and as long as a gay person is not hitting on you, keep your mouth shut.
And even then, a polite "No thank you." is all that is called for.
You and your republican buddies want to fight it, pay for it yourself. No tax dollars should be used, you want to fight it get the rich to donate to your cause.
Yes they did. See U.S. Const. Amendment 9.