Obama: We're "tightening the noose on Qaddafi"
Updated at 2:10 p.m. ET
The United States and the international community "are slowly tightening the noose on Qaddafi," President Obama said in a news conference today.
Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi is engaged in fierce fighting with rebel forces trying to oust the strongman, which grew out of a wave of unrest that has hit North Africa and the Middle East. However, large financial seizures, sanctions and an arms embargo have left Qaddafi "more and more isolated internationally," the president said.
"It is in the United States' interest and the interest of people in Libya that Qaddafi leave," Mr. Obama said. "We're going to take a wide range of actions to try to bring about that outcome... And as I've said before, when it comes to U.S. military actions, whether it's a no-fly zone or other options, you've got to balance costs versus benefits. And, you know, I don't take those decisions lightly."
While Qaddafi is becoming more isolated, he is digging in, taking back territory from the rebel forces in Ras Lanuf and other areas with superior military force. "The plan is to squash the rebels with no mercy," his son Saif Qaddafi told CBS News.
When asked by CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid whether the U.S. had a moral obligation to intervene in Libya, Mr. Obama said, "I continue to believe that not only the United States but the international community has an obligation to do what it can to prevent a repeat of something like what occurred in the Balkans in the '90s; what occurred in Rwanda."
One option is 24-hour surveillance, which would provide an alert system to detect if civilian massacres by Qaddafi forces, the president said.
"Obviously, we're going to have to look at what develops on the ground on a case-by-case basis," he said. "It's going to require some judgment calls, and those are difficult ones."
Obama offers condolences, assistance to people of Japan
Obama: I'm willing to tap U.S. oil reserve
NATO will be meeting on Tuesday to consider a no-fly zone, Mr. Obama said, and the U.S. has been in discussions with both Arab and African countries to gauge their support for such an action. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to meet with Libyan opposition leaders in the next several days.
"The bottom line is is that I have not taken any options off the table at this point," Mr. Obama said. "I think it is important to understand that we have moved about as swiftly as an international coalition has ever moved to impose sanctions on Gadhafi."
However, the president added, "any time I send United States forces into a potentially hostile situation there are risks involved and there are consequences. And it is my job as president to make sure that we have considered all those risks."
It's also important to maintain a strong international coalition, he said.
When asked whether he was concerned Qaddafi may the firepower to defeat the rebels, Mr. Obama responded, "I am concerned, absolutely."
Qaddafi has troops that remain loyal to him, and he still has assets -- in spite of financial freezes imposed against him -- he's used to hire mercenaries.
"And I think that's why it's so important for us not to stop where we are, but to continue to find options that will add additional pressure, including sending a clear message to those around Qaddafi that the world is watching," Mr. Obama said.
There have been referrals to the International Criminal Court, he said.
On Thursday, National Intelligence Director James Clapper told Congress that the Qaddafi regime "will prevail" eventually over rebel forces. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) criticized Clapper's remarks, saying they were "not helpful to our national security interests," and called for Clapper's resignation.
Mr. Obama said today that Clapper was simply "making a hard-headed assessment about military capability."
"He wasn't stating policy, so let me be clear, again, about what our policy, as determined by me, the president of the United States, is toward the situation there," Mr. Obama continued. "I believe that Qaddafi is on the wrong side of history. I believe that the Libyan people are anxious for freedom and the removal of somebody who has suppressed them for decades now. And we are going to be in contact with the opposition, as well as in consultation with the international community, to try to achieve the goal of Mr. Qaddafi being removed from power."
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 171 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 350 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups 66 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 327 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare 36 Comments
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016
- Immigration deal reached in House
Oh... and on another note:
Where is Code Pink and the anti-war left?
They all said that Bush was a war criminal for starting an "illegal" war.... Now that Obama has continued that "illegal" war, is he a war criminal?
Where are the protests against Obama?
These people are so ignorant and racist idk how they are suppose to govern and protect when all they show is hate & deceit also killing civilians they are so called protecting.
Planes fly to that region of the world daily and if your love for your new found friends, who I feel certain you would invite to Sunday dinner, is that strong you are encouraged to join them in their fight and spare the lives of our precious sons and daughters you are so anxious and willing to sacrifice for a cause you only talk about.
It is not our fight. If they want freedom they need to spill their blood. Join their cause, risk all you have or be silent.
We do not need to go to war in Libya! If President Obama were to send troops in today, the same rightwing zealot would be moaning about that. And, the cost....my God....I can hear the right wingnuts foaming at the mouth now about that.
I suppose you would like to see us in another bloody war we cannot get out of? How many American lives would you like to see lost in such a debacle? How about sending your son, daughter, brother, sister to die in Libya? It's O.K. with you as long as it's someone's else's loved ones I suppose?
I would love to hear what you think he should be doing that he isn't?
I am fed up with two-bit politicians like Lindsay Graham and John McCain who want to assemble "a coalition of the willing" to liberate Libya. Remember the last person who used that term? Remember what it led to?
Military experts both in the US and NATO have pointed out that many of the military actions that McCain and the GOP want are far more easily said than done. Obama listens to the experts and respects their opinions. McCain and his buddies think they know more than the Pentagon, and NATO put together. In addition, I have yet to hear one Republican denounce the King Inqusition, a disgraceful message of hatred to the Arab Freedom fighters, who are predominantly Muslim.
Obama's cautious handling of the Libyan crisis. His careful examination of the options prove that he's by far the best man for the job.
And just maybe the Islamic community can do more to stem the tide of terrorism. Seems like a lot of money from the Islamic communities go to those Pakistani religious schools that teach hate and extremism. ANd Obama continues to have no clue what he is doing. His community organizing experience is not enough to make him an adequate leader of the free world.
**** or get off the pot.
By the time you get done dithering; all the Libyans seeking freedom will be dead.
The Libyan people have been begging for help since the beginning.
WHERE THE HELL IS IT.?!!!!!
We definitely do not need the "cowboy mentality" of the past. We do not need to be in a bloody war in Libya...countless American lives would be lost needlessly...AGAIN.
Also, what do you have to say about the anti-Islamic hearing conducted by Congressman King? What sort of message is this sending the Muslim freedom fighters in the Middle East.
"All talk" best describes your comments. The military experts have earned their five stars, where are yours?
Chalk this comment up to bad history.