Santorum Blasts Obama for Siding with Egyptian Protesters
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
WASHINGTON -- Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, a potential 2012 Republican presidential contender, blasted President Obama for siding with Egyptian protesters as they press for democracy, instead of the American-friendly authoritarian Egyptian government of President Hosni Mubarak.
"We've turned our backs on... almost all of our allies," Santorum said with respect to the president's foreign policy. As protesters voice their anger against Mubarak, "What does the president do? He sides with the protesters."
He qualified his statements to say that it was not necessarily bad to support pro-democracy protesters. However, he said it was a bad move in the context of the president's response to similar protests in Iran in 2009.
"When we turned our backs a year and half ago on Iran, there was a revolution," he said. "Did he call for the current regime to step down? No."
NRA's Wayne LaPierre: "Government Policies Are Getting us Killed"McConnell: We'll Keeping Fighting Health Care Law Whether It's Popular or Not
Newt Gingrich: Replace the EPA
Michele Bachmann: China's Hu is "Your Daddy"
Read All of Hotsheet's Reports from CPAC
Santorum was speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington. an annual event that has drawn about 11,000 conservatives to the capital. He was the first speaker at the event to broach the ongoing protests in Egypt.
The president's approach to those separate uprisings, Santorum said, tell American allies "that when things get tough, we walk away." And it tells American enemies, he said, "that when things get tough, we'll be with them."
President Obama has, in fact, called for immediate change in Egypt, but he has stopped short of calling for Mubarak to resign.
"America will continue to do everything that we can to support an orderly and genuine transition to democracy in Egypt," Mr. Obama said today following reports that Mubarak may step down. "We'll have more to say as this plays out," he added.
In 2009, Mr. Obama gave similarly hands-off remarks regarding the situation in Iran.
"The Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government," he said. "If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion."
It was generally thought that Mr. Obama's remarks were intended to avoid giving Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the ammunition needed to accuse the United States of interfering with their political process. Yet Santorum said that Mr. Obama's strategy lacked courage.
Sizing Up the 2012 GOP Presidential Contenders
The president, he said, "has refused to look at the sitaution in Iran and Egypt and around the world and do what Ronald Reagan would never be afraid to do - call evil, evil."
He criticized the president for not calling jihadism "evil" or sharia law "incompatible with with Western civlization."
Stephanie Condon is a political reporter for CBSNews.com. You can read more of her posts here.
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- The Ted Cruz conundrum
- Petraeus biographer regrets affair
- Senators lack votes on immigration despite progress
- Senator: Oklahoma "hit hard, but we're not knocked out"
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 205 Comments
- As summer approaches, sequestration threatens holiday fun
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms













But he seems to insinuate that support of friendly dictators for 30 years is the way to go.
Heck, Bush was all for this democracy among the Muslim countries thing (bringing "Freedom" to Iraq and all).
Obama knew that he had to say just enough to let the youth in Iran know that we support them, but not enough to enrage the leadership. Because the regime in Iran would not have taken their frustrations and anger out on Americans but on their own people. You just can't say whatever you want, when you want and not have consequences.
The same is true in Egypt, 300 are dead and Khalid Said was beaten to death in the street by 2 policemen for "Posting on a Facebook page." I saw the morgue pictures beside a recent picture and can tell you that I did not even recognize the person in the morgue as a 22 year old man.
These protests could erupt into violence at any time and have remained surprisingly peaceful...so far. Santorum does not understand that you cannot say anything to antagonize an already deadly situation, because the Egyptian people will have to pay the price.
What an unthinkable thing to do now..stir things up about Egypt even more than they are now ...just for your own personal and political gain. Shame on your Rick.
I said 10 years ago that Rick Santorum would run for President. No one believed me then but I sure am glad he is running now because I want to see Palin, Santorum and Michelle Bachman in the same debate. It will be more entertaining than American Idol!
According to Santorum's insanity, the Iranian people's failure where the Egyptians might be succeeding is all Obama's fault? And it has nothing to do with the leadership and conditions in the country of Iran being very different from those in Egypt?
Santorum sounds like another one who's bulk of foreign policy experience consists of being able to see from their house.
He is going to attack him on this NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES! WHY?!
Because Santorum sees himself as representing the extreme right-wing opposition to him, that's why! Santorum is purposely arguing just to be disruptive and a contrarian...which is a big part of the reason the voters voted him out of office! Thus, we shouldn't waste a lot of time seriously considering or indulging in...his irresponsible behavior!
"Jesus wept."
Why would a man of faith be any better at restoring America then any other?
I think that you'll be waiting for longer than you can imagine for the return of Jesus.