Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ February 3, 2011, 2:16 PM

House Republicans Drop "Forcible Rape" Language from Bill on Abortion

CBS

Updated: 4:27PM ET

House Republicans have opted to drop the word "forcible" from a section of House bill about abortion that addresses rape, following widespread condemnation from Democrats and abortion rights activists.

The "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act," also known as H.R. 3, is a bill that would make permanent the "Hyde Amendment" - a provision banning the use of taxpayer subsidies for abortions that currently requires annual Congressional renewal.

The bill came under fire earlier this week, however, for changes it made to the original language of the amendment - which includes exemptions for women who have become pregnant as a result of rape, incest or life-threatening illnesses. In the language of H.R. 3, only pregnancies resulting from "forcible rape" were exempted. The bill would also limit  exemptions among victims of incest to minors only.

Critics of the bill argued that Republicans were trying to "redefine rape," and that federal coverage for the abortions of rape and incest victims would be dramatically limited.

Comedy Central's "Daily Show" added fuel to the fire Wednesday night, when Jon Stewart prompted a mock debate with correspondent Kristen Schaal on what exactly is meant by "forcible rape."

"You'd be surprised how many drugged, underaged or mentally handicapped young women have been gaming the system," Schaal said. "Sorry, ladies the free abortion ride is over."

(Watch the video at left.)

On Thursday, a spokesperson for the bill's author, New Jersey Republican Chris Smith, told Politico that he would be changing the wording of the bill to reflect the language of the original provision.

"The word forcible will be replaced with the original language from the Hyde Amendment," said Smith spokesman Jeff Sagnip.

Opponents of H.R. 3 argue that even without the "forcible" rape language, the bill contains a number of provisions that will limit women's access to funding for abortions - including the limits on exemptions for cases of incest, and tax hikes for people with private insurance plans that provide coverage for abortion.

Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, told Hotsheet she found it "deeply offensive" that the members of Congress would remove the word "forcible" but allow the language regarding incest to remain.

"That they would actually go back and think about it carefully, and take out the word 'forcible,' and yet withhold health care from women being subjected to incest...I found that deeply deeply offensive and insulting," she said.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
94 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ankhorite says:
These misogynistic anti-choice bills are the Republicans in Congress paying their dues to the benighted religious tyrants who want to use our public police forces to monitor women's pregnancies.

The Republican party doesn't really want to outlaw abortion, because then how would they be able to use the issue to extort money from their faithful? The Republicans make hateful anti-choice gestures that come down hardest on the poor: women who can't travel, women who can't take an extra day off work, women who can't leave the state or the country to get the health care they need, women who can't afford to pay for abortion services without insurance. REPUBLICAN women, and the wives and daughters of Republican men, can afford all that. Poor women, working women, and single mothers cannot.

Maybe we should start calling them RePUBICans. I don't know what it's going to take to get these perverts to get their heads (and laws, and cops) out from under my skirt.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
san850 says:
More of the same....political theatrics and posturing among the Repubs. When will they start actually doing something worthwhile and in the best interest of the American people?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
morris2196 says:
Seems to me the larger issue is whether the circumstances under which a baby is conceived determine whether the baby has a right to live.
reply
Ankhorite replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Morris, I disagree. The issue of how the fetus was conceived is really nobody's business. The "larger issue" is whether women can be forced to continue pregnancies against their will. What do you call a woman like that? The word is "slave."
linkicon reporticon emailicon
not_fooled_by_Righties says:
Where are the job creating bills from the Repuglicon's?

We are still waiting for them to do SOMETHING that matters!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
WillowSunstar says:
Rape is rape, period. The Republicans are alienating a lot of people by doing that. I'm Libertarian and I disagree with this move by them.
reply
Ankhorite replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
All Libertarians should feel as you do, WillowSunstar. Otherwise, they're complete hypocrites -- defending liberty for men, but not for the 53% of the U.S. population which is female.

What do you call a woman forced to bear against her will? A slave. It amazes me that the anti-choice Libertarians can look themselves in the mirror every morning and not be ashamed.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
miami_don says:
by 1voiceofreason February 3, 2011 9:28 PM EST

...The most attacked (feared?) Christian group on this issue is the Catholic Church. This is so because, unlike most Protestant groups, the Catholic Church has had a constant (~2000 year old) teaching on abortion. Abortion is inherently evil because its intent and effect is to terminate the normal development of a unique living human organism (a.k.a. a baby like all of us non-aborted big people were for 9 months or so). Referring to abortion as "a surgical procedure" fails to capture its gravely immoral "human sacrifice" aspect... at over 50 million abortions since Roe V. Wade (that's 50 million people who were denied the right to be born) we've quite outdone the Mayans and Incans combined!

==========================

Feared? When religion has to enforce morality by creating secular laws I would consider that failure. Please climb out of your box for a moment voice and look at this with different eyes.

As has been the history of the Catholic Church it has been far more successful at creating victims than solutions. These laws are designed to target women only with a boys-will-be-boys mentality that is beyond logic.

What solutions do you propose to balance out the cause and need for abortion? Is the church willing to support legislation that the fathers of unwanted children will be forced to pay for the upbringing, clothing, feeding, and education of these children? Failing that, how about a law to force church's to pay for the upbringing, clothing, feeding, and education of all unwanted children?

No; of course not that is the job of those federal social programs that conservatives hate. How rich is the Catholic Church? How many children go to bed hungry every night?

Also, I would be careful about using Indian tribes and killing in the same sentence with the Catholic Church. The Indian tribes of Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean Islands, and South American were enslaved and some completely eradicated by Christians from the Catholic Church.
reply
not_fooled_by_Righties replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Maybe that's why the Priests raped little boys.

No abortions needed.
CarloCaraluzzo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And all of their children were molested and raped. Read about the catholic mission schools on reservations.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gig76 says:
Every republican house member who voted against health care and want to harm women in any way at all along with any harm to children are on the list to check off for "don't re elect". They will regret any and all things they vote against health care reform, women, children, anything that isn't American they will regret. Their votes are on public display and they will be reminded of their hatred towards women, defiance against health care, and for caring more about lobbyists, others who give them money, and for caring more about their paycheck from taxpayers than finding well paying jobs for tax payers who pay them. Rid congress of Tea party GOP Republican parasites with RidX! Cleanse America of these Tea Party GOP Republican parasites with RidX!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gig76 says:
How would these GOP Tea Party Republican like to be raped in the as. especially forcible rape without their consent? Of course, Tea Party GOP Republicans rape Americans everyday with their control, abuse of power, and hate towards others of difference in thinking their way. Cleanse America and use RidX on Tea Party GOP Republicans to rid of these lousy parasites!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gig76 says:
2012 Victory for Democrats. Tea Party GOP Republicans hate 1) women, 2) that they can't rape women, 3) hate health care for women and children and anyone who isn't "white", 4) hate women and more women who remind them of their controlling mothers, 5) hate women who have children who are women. Get rid of GOP. 2012 -- Vote Democrats! Yes in 2 years, Democrats will control house, Senate and President in sweeping elections nationwide. Cleanse America of Tea Party GOP Republicans since they are bad for America and bad for business! 2012 Vote and elect real Democrats who care about real Americans!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
davidd5063 says:
The GOP is intent on wasting time pointing out how they and their supporters will vote for idiocy and most of the Democrats (Ben Nelson is a Dem in name only) will not. They are trying to demonstrate the difference between themselves and Dems - kinda like the Christians talking like you havn't heard all those bible stories before. Thinking people should not try to understand GOP behavior - it's geared to a different kind of animal - the GOP abandoned the vote of thinking people back when they ran Ronny R - can't argue that is hasn't worked out for them.
reply
See all 94 Comments