Political Hotsheet
By

Stephanie Condon /

CBS News/ January 19, 2011, 12:49 PM

AFL-CIO Leader Says Obama Is "Pro-Business," Challenges Him to Do More for Workers

Richard Trumka

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka visits with White House National Economic Council Director Lawrence Summers before of a meeting of the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board (PERAB) in the State Dining Room at the White House October 4, 2010.

/ Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

As President Obama works this year to improve his relationship with the business community and address the nation's fiscal challenges, the labor movement is issuing a challenge to him: don't forget about workers or the middle class.

Washington is "having the wrong conversation," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said today in the capitol city. "We don't need to settle for stagnation and ever spiraling inequality."

While unemployment continues to hover close to 10 percent, Trumka says leaders in Washington should focus on making job-creating investments in infrastructure and education, rather than focusing on fiscal austerity.

"We live in an Alice in Wonderland political climate," Trumka said. "In this topsy-turvy world, the same leaders who fought so valiantly to cut taxes for the wealthy turn right around and lecture us about the imminent bankruptcy of Social Security. Only at the Mad Hatter's tea party does that make sense."

And while Trumka said it is largely Republicans who are "giving up on America" by rejecting government spending, he called out the president for coming down too softly on the industries that led to the financial crisis. Mr. Obama is "about as pro-business as any president," Trumka said.

"All the firms have record profits, and they're paying the lowest taxes they've paid in decades," he said. "What more do you want from a president?"

The president in recent weeks has given indications he plans to follow a fiscally moderate course in the next year and intends to repair his icy relations with business. Yesterday, he announced he was ordering a government-wide overhaul of federal regulations -- an order that Trumka said amounted in large part to a "distraction."

Today, Mr. Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao are meeting at the White House with business leaders including Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein and General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt. Trumka lamented the credence paid to business leaders while the 9/11 first responders struggled for years to pass legislation for more federal assistance to treat their health problems.

"How did we come to the point where our country's ruling class thinks that firefighters... and teachers and nurses are the problem, and people like Lloyd Blankfein and Rupter Murdoch are the solution?" he asked.

Trumka challenged Mr. Obama to change the national discourse when he delivers his State of the Union address before Congress next week -- to issue "a call to action, a call to invest in our future, to create jobs, to be the country we can and must be."

"The debate about our future begins and ends concretely with the question of jobs," he continued. "I believe the 2012 election will be fundamentally about jobs."

Trumka also warned that scaling back entitlement program would spell political disaster. "Outside the looking glass, the American people would never forgive their leaders for cutting Social Security or Medicare," he said.

Many are anticipating that in his State of the Union, Mr. Obama will give recommendations for addressing the national deficit and debt. Some are speculating he may suggest some modifications to Social Security, as recommended by his bipartisan deficit commission last year.

Trumka also warned against fiscal austerity at the state and local levels. The AFL-CIO is increasingly working at the state and local levels to push for infrastructure investments, but he said Republicans elected last November, like Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, are "attacking the very idea of the American middle class."

He chastised Walker and Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels for rejecting high-speed rail projects and "turning their backs on jobs, turning their backs on their own state's future."

Ultimately, he said, jobs created will be the "yardstick" by which every politician at the state and federal level is judged.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
20 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YrWrongAgain says:
In China, a project costing $600 is done by three people earning $200 each. In America, that $600 project is done by two people earning $300 each but taxed enough to support one person who is now unemployed.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
YrWrongAgain says:
"He's 'About as Pro-Business as Any President' We'd Vote For. Which is too say, almost as pro-business as the head of the Chinese Communist Party.
reply
realist51 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lets see under bush the only labor law passed was an increase in minumum wage which hadn't gone up in 10 years under a republican controlled congress most business's were already paying that much anyway. yet congress took pay raises every year, clinton had a bill waiting to be signed for ergonomics and bush let it die, clinton signed the republican drafted NAFTA and there were other so called FREE trade agreements signed under him and bush. yet the jobs still left the country. Too, only 10 to 15% of the work force is unionized that means 85% of the jobs out there are non union so the B.S. that bloggers onb here ar spreading is just that. states that are under water for deficit spending are also states that have cut there own throats by reducing there revenues with taxcuts. and not contributing to the so called pension funds as they had agreed to with a contract. also ask yourself this do you think your worth what you make? then have somebody come along and tell you that your not worth that? yet were's the out cry about ultra high executive wages? screw that crap bolting a fender to a car is done with robotics and most of the automotive jobs have been replaced by robots watch discorvery once in awhile "mega Factories". and if you think it's so easy why aren't you doing it. also the non union auto makers pay pretty much the same as the union with the same benefits. however there managment systems are much more oreintainted to increased productivity which they get from there employee's and not from the top executives.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wfw3536 says:
The Unions were really taken in by Obama and all of his promises. We continue to lose more and more jobs overseas and this administration in doing nothing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
The average CEO make a thousand times what these union workers make. The largest discrepancy in the world.

Unions were the only defense the workers had against the absolute uncaring greed of the CEOs. This is why the corporate puppet Reagan and his Republican followers were so intent on destroying the unions.

This country has been on the road downhill to our current 3rd world status since the disaster of Reagan. And the filthy rich are even more filthy. A lot, lot, lot more.
reply
1renegade replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Whats wrong? Are you pissed because you can't get a raise on your welfare check?
DashRipRock2012 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyal, what is holding those union workers back from going to college and getting an education so they too can earn a better wage?

What is holding them back?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pragmatist1 says:
...labor unions are part of the socialist experiment...
reply
noloyalisti replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You don't even know what socialism is. Don't embarrass us any more. We are already embarrassed of this ignorant, gullible, uneducated, clueless nation.
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Why don't you leave this "ignorant, gullible, uneducated, clueless nation," you friendless little man? Skip away, skip away, skip away.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Unions created the 40-hour work week, the weekends and ended child labor laws. They are the only defense against greedy, rich giant corporations raping and pillaging the people like they have done in America.

Minimum work safety standards and pay are why they bought the government to pass the tragic and failed (except for their own greedy selves) the fake free-trade agreements like NAFTA.
reply
Lifeson2112 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unions are also the reason vehicles cost what they do now. You really think someone needs to make $45/hr to bolt fenders on a car? Talk about greed! Unions have also driven all our jobs overseas by demanding higher wages. Companies have to hire foreign workers to survive. Unions are the epitome of greed and corruption.
YrWrongAgain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Unions don't exist in workers' paradises.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RatPackSixGun says:
Unions are they're own worst enemy and the shipping of labor to factories overseas is the direct result of unions so severely strangling US companies that it was no longer profitable, or even marginally surviveable, to perform the work here any longer.

This is not a FACT that has anything to do with either political party; it has to do with union mobster leadership has destroyed the money base that it set out to suck dry to begin with. It's done; stick a fork in the American laborer and move on to the next ponzi scheme, please.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
crazyname says:
In my world, the union employees work for business, not the other way around. If you are pro union, you better be pro-business because as times get tighter, jobes get more scarce and people don't want to be paying the high pricefixing union wages and waste. that is what is worng with unions, they are at odds with the business they work for, and Big government is the only one that prints thier own or takes it from the taxpayers. Unions don't care about anybody but themselves!, not even their members. Just like the liberal politians, it is all about the power!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
realist51 says:
he already has, and the rest of the goverment could care less about its people, the republicans are only looking after the top 2% and the dems are only looking to keep there jobs. there will be little to no job growth proposals from either party that will go anywhere, they will deregulate the work enviroment to the point that we will be working like our grandparents from the 20's all for the increase in profits for the top 2% then tell ya that your not working hard enough and that you are eating to much. and really what does the president and or any legislator have in common with the average middleclass american? Nothing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
We all now that the giant American corporations and the greedy, filthy rich "people" who run them have purchased the government. This has reached it's apex after the infamous January 21, 2010 Republican Supreme Court Citizens United decision.

After that the Republican Corporation was able to buy the 2010 mid-terms. And they will buy the 2012 elections to finally vanquish any dissent and any vestiges of wealth that have not yet been stolen from the middle class.
reply
RatPackSixGun replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The "richest" corporate contributors to politics today are contributing to the Democratic party - just ask Pelosi about her husband's activity but don't expect an answer any time soon.

You idiots who spend your day in here blindly defending your party --pick one it doesn't matter -- are like cocaine addicted monkeys who refuse to stop working on your next fix long enough to see how severely broken your situation has become.
See all 20 Comments