Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ January 12, 2011, 9:56 PM

Obama Calls for Civility in Wake of Tragedy

For the most part, the response to the Tucson tragedy has been a dispiriting spectacle. Within hours of the shooting, some on the left were pinning the blame in part on Sarah Palin, despite the lack of evidence that alleged shooter Jared Loughner had been inspired by her rhetoric.

Then some on the other side began attacking the left for politicizing the tragedy - accusations, of course, that were themselves a politicization of the tragedy. Instead of remembering the victims of the attack, many became embroiled in a desperate and misguided attempt to tie a suspect with a muddled belief system to their political opposition.

Obama: Rep. Giffords "Opened Her Eyes" Today
Text of Obama Speech
Giffords' Friends in Room When She Opened Eyes
Special Section: Tragedy in Tucson

Before his speech in Tucson Wednesday night to make the tragedy, Republicans warned President Obama not to politicize the event - not to make it about the incendiary rhetoric that dragged down the discourse during the midterm election season. Yet when a member of Congress is shot at point-blank range, such rhetoric inevitably becomes a part of the national conversation.

President Obama spoke to an estimated 26,000 people inside and outside the McKale arena at University of Arizona in Tucson Wednesday night.

/ AP

And so Mr. Obama didn't shy away from the question of the national discourse. But when he stepped into the fray, he offered something few others have in the wake of the tragedy: A call for Americans to reset the debate into something productive.

"At a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized - at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than we do - it's important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds," he said.

Mr. Obama noted that Saturday's events couldn't be explained away by rhetoric, no matter how incendiary. The actions of the murderer were not, he rightfully said, the result of a "simple lack of civility." Yet he said that doesn't mean that it is not a moment to strive for a greater civility - to remember that "a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to our challenges as a nation."

He spent much of the speech honoring the fallen and the heroes that emerged in the wake of the attack - telling the stories of the everyday Americans who lived and are living inspiring lives, the people who've been too quickly cast from our thoughts in recent days in the rush to score political points.

He asked: "How can we honor the fallen? How can we be true to their memory?"

And he answered: By remembering to be the people we want to be, not the ones we too often let ourselves become.

"If this tragedy prompts reflection and debate, as it should, let's make sure it's worthy of those we have lost," said Mr. Obama. "Let's make sure it's not on the usual plane of politics and point scoring and pettiness that drifts away with the next news cycle."

It was a broadside against the worst excesses of the debate since Saturday - the finger-pointing and nasty attacks that are too often the default setting in our national discourse. The speech was not a call for Americans to paper over their differences - a healthy debate over how to keep another tragedy from taking place, he said, is "an essential ingredient in our exercise of self-government."

But it was a call for Americans to remember the point of that debate: Not to score points but to move forward and make their country a better place.

"We should be willing to challenge old assumptions in order to lessen the prospects of such violence in the future," he said. "But what we can't do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another. That we cannot do. That we cannot do."

"As we discuss these issues, let each of us do so with a good dose of humility," continued the president. "Rather than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let's use this occasion to expand our moral imaginations, to listen to each other more carefully, to sharpen our instincts for empathy, and remind ourselves of all the ways that our hopes and dreams are bound together."

It was a message that sought to transcends the politics into which the debate has descended, a call to reflect on whether we're living the lives to which we aspire.

"That process of reflection, of making sure we align our values with our actions - that, I believe, is what a tragedy like this requires," said the president. "For those who were harmed, those who were killed - they are part of our family, an American family 300 million strong."

President Barack Obama speaks at the Tucson memorial service, Jan. 12, 2011.

/ CBS

Despite the somber occasion, what Mr. Obama offered was ultimately not a lament but a celebration. A celebration of lives lost too soon, of lives still being lived, and of American potential - of the fact that no matter how much we tear at each other, we have not lost the capacity to rise to the occasion.

"I believe we can be better," he said. "Those who died here, those who saved lives here - they help me believe. We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us. I believe that for all our imperfections, we are full of decency and goodness, and that the forces that divide us are not as strong as those that unite us."

And that, he told his countrymen Wednesday night in Tucson, is something that no amount of the partisan bickering, no ideological fights or madman's bullets, can ever change.

6 Photos

Arizona Shooting Victims


Brian Montopoli is a political reporter for CBSNews.com. You can read more of his posts here.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
191 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
livfreeordi says:
Regarding the comment by the author in the above article.

"For the most part, the response to the Tucson tragedy has been a dispiriting spectacle. Within hours of the shooting, some on the left were pinning the blame in part on Sarah Palin, despite the lack of evidence that alleged shooter Jared Loughner had been inspired by her rhetoric.
Then some on the other side began attacking the left for politicizing the tragedy - accusations, of course, that were themselves a politicization of the tragedy."

Unless the author presented this faulty logic on purpose, because he is a biased liberal hack..he needs a perspective check..

I totally reject the moral equivalence he assumes between the behavior of the Left and Right regarding this tragedy.

How are those on the right EQUALLY responsible for lowering poltical discourse..simply for DEFENDING themselves against UNTRUE accusations?!!

What did the author want them do.. Simply act silent ..as if they were guilty of the false accusations?

Damned if they don't respond..and damned if they do!!

Nice spin, Mr.Montopli!

Scurrilous lies and slurs require rebuttal.. lest the lie be accepted as truth.

Those on the Right not only had a right, they had a moral obligation to insure that the truth got out.

And if that upset the author's sensibilities...too bad!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kimerk28 says:
I've seen a lot of discussions online, and these on CBSnews are so full of name-calling and "vitriolic rhetoric" (popular phrase today) that its impossible to have a conversation. Good luck to you all. :)

Enjoy your point of view. It's obviously very civil.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
DavidCalleo says:
You have been drinking the KOOL AID. What did the media say caused the MUSLIM extremist at FT HOOD to shoot 13 member's of the military that protect your socialist butt in this country?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Hialeahtom says:
This pea brain Obama is labeling the rest of our citizens the same as a few crazy characters we have in our society, just like any other country? When is this guy open his pea brain? Maybe he is not capable of doing that.

Hialeahtom
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amusedbyitall says:
If you are compelled to defend hateful rhetoric, then you have moral culpability in the death of a 9-year old girl.
reply
kimerk28 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Seems its only labeled "hateful rhetoric" if it comes from conservative sources. In reality, both sides have used the same types of word and symbolic usage. Only now, it's the fault of those on the right. Because it serves the purposes of those in the media that want to shut down or limit free speech rights. At least for some.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
discussthis says:
After two years of "back of the bus", "elections have consequences", "we won", "tea baggers" and "astroturf", closed door deals, all of a sudden after the November "shellacking", obamao called for bipartisanship. Now, he calls for civility. Sounds a tad bit desperate to me, no?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hamsterattack says:
What's up with Tucson? are they that starved for entertainment where they cheer during a memorial? WOOOOOO!!! U OF A U OF A U OF A!!! come on people it's a M E M O R I A L....

geez
reply
kimerk28 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
And how's our economy today, after 6 years of dem control. (yes, even under Bush, he just rolled over them)

Crazy weather isn't a new phenomenon either. Global warming is possibly happening, but is it man-caused? That's the debate. What about Climate-gate? It doesn't hit the news much, does it?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dennisall77 says:
here is a new thread about how wrong the right has always been... wild crazy weather everywhere, warmes year on record, warmest decase on record, wildest weather on record: Austrailia flooding, East snow amounts, West's record rainfalls and flooding with avalanch warnings now, droughts, pestilence, jeeeeez... I would think the right would at the very least be out with warnings of the end of times. Climate change is underway with a vengeance and all the crazy right can say is "How can there be global warming when it is so cold here?" LOL (btw, global warming results in extremes in weather, which will include cold and snow!!) Let's add their stalling on emissions controls to McCarthyism, Watergate, Whitewater (nothing found after millions spent investigating), economy trashing during 2000's, Katrina, etc etc etc
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cloopy says:
heres one of many,msnbc all last yr was talkin bout the tea party atackers on minorities at the march,all heresay,not ioata of evidence,no audio,no video,just he said she said crap!!!!! msnbc favorite, sharpton saying it happened was enough for olberman,madow,ed to scream racism!!,towards the end of 2010 in desperation msnbc threw in the race card, for instance msnbc.and the jerr brown race,brown won for one reason!!!!!!!msnbc and the left wing media blew the latin bitter maid story way way out of context,as usual ......distort facts,lies and lean forwaqrd lolololo.lolo.lo.l then how bout how msnbc tired us with the christine oddonnel which stuff? its all dirty political journalism,out of desperation!!!!
reply
dennisall77 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wow... lol... someone sounds bitter and desperate... and a little looney
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cloopy says:
thats right fox,fair and balanced!!!why is it msnbc,shows like olberman,madow,ed ect...are contsantly showing footage of palin,right wing stars,usually i think im on fox,then i realize oh wait,thats that desperate,msnbc,all they can do is focus on republicans,msnbc,never ever discusses ways to fix america,the watch wrod is contantly,defame,discredit and attack,its what msnbc is all about,what will the dems do when a dem challenges obama for the nomination?
reply
kimerk28 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
msnbc is trying very hard to attract the left audience they are sure is out there. Ed Schultz is just a try at giving them their own Rush. Is it working? Somehow, for some reason, the average person doesn't find it as compelling as Fox and talk radio. I wonder why. I think it's because they (the conservatives) appeal to logic rather than emotion. (in general, certainly all the time or all the hosts) I've listened to progressive radio, Rachel Maddow, Ed, Al Franken (Al wasn't bad) and they basically failed to present an intelligent and compelling response. I think that's why they failed.
See all 191 Comments

Most Discussed