Political Hotsheet
By

Lucy Madison /

CBS News/ December 20, 2010, 2:07 PM

What's Next for the Gay Rights Movement?

AP / CBS
Just days after Saturday's historic passage of a stand-alone Senate bill repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," David Brock, founder and CEO of the liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America, has announced the launch of Equality Matters - a new media initiative that aims to promote lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender equality.

The initiative, which Brock describes in a press release as a "communications war room for gay equality," comes as activists start to shift their focus to other issues in the fight for gay rights.

"Yesterday was a very important breakthrough," Richard Socarides, who will be the president of Equality Matters, said in a Sunday interview with the New York Times. "President Obama's comments, especially following the vote, were very significant, where he for the first time connected race and gender to sexual orientation under the banner of civil rights."

Socarides argued that gay rights advocates can not afford to waste time basking in their success in repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

"We will celebrate this important victory for five minutes," he said, "and then we have to move on, because we are the last group of Americans who are discriminated against in federal law and there is a lot of work to do."

With the repeal of "Don't Ask," as well as the passage of 2009's hate crimes bill making assaults based on sexuality a federal crime, two of four overarching legislative goals of gay rights advocates remain. They are (1) passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would make it illegal for employers to make decisions about hiring, firing, promoting and/or paying someone based on his or her sexual orientation; and (2) repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union between a man and a woman for the purpose of all federal laws.

Neither initiative has gained steam in Congress under the Obama administration. Mr. Obama himself says he does not support same-sex marriage, opting instead for a stance that favors civil unions for gay couples, though he signaled openness to changing that position in October.

Mr. Obama's Justice Department defended the "Defense of Marriage Act" in court, even though the Department made clear it does not support it. After a district judge in July ruled that the law is unconstitutional, the Obama administration chose to appeal the ruling.

Many gay rights advocates have expressed disappointment with the administration for its perceived inaction, or silence, on gay issues.

"Most Americans believe that gays and lesbians are entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as their fellow citizens, including now over 50% who believe in marriage equality," Socarides wrote in a Dec. 19 blog post. "Yet in Washington during these last two years, even with the historic passage of 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal, we were unable to fully transform favorable public opinion into the powerful and undeniable force for change that it should have been."

Progressives are likely to face a steep battle in repealing the Defense of Marriage Act in the new Congress - which will be significantly more conservative than the current body thanks to GOP gains in November  - and some believe the issue has a better chance in the courts.

Meanwhile, despite a number of polls indicating widespread public support for the repeal of "Don't Ask," some Republican congressmen have already vowed to fight it.

Republican Virginia Del. Bob Marshall says he is drafting legislation that would ban gays from serving in the Virginia National Guard. "This policy [to allow gays to serve openly] will weaken military recruitment and retention, and will increase pressure for a military draft,'' he said in explaining the effort.

Marshall also lambasted the integration of openly gay men and women into the military as a "social experiment with our troops and our national security."

"After 232 years of prohibiting active, open homosexuals from enlisting in our military, President Obama and a majority in Congress are conducting a social experiment with our troops and our national security," Marshall said. "In countries where religions and cultures find homosexual acts immoral, the Obama administration's repeal policy will work to the detriment of all American troops in securing local cooperation with our nation's foreign policy goals."

Brock said fighting the "ferocious fundamentalism in the Republican Party and the conservative movement" was one of Equality Matters' primary goals.

"Traditional conservatives and the Tea Party movement are united only in their contempt for equal rights for all Americans and a desire to return America to a 19th century idyll," he said, adding in an interview with the Times that the group has no plans to compromise its goals.

"We believe the big battle is full equality, which is gay marriage," he said.


Lucy Madison
Lucy Madison is a political reporter for CBSNews.com. You can read more of her posts here. Follow Hotsheet on Facebook and Twitter.
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
125 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
recovered2 says:
There have always been gays in the black community, that is no secret. The issue is how the community has dealt with gay individuals. As a young boy I can recall a couple of friends from elementary school who we all suspected of being gay but never said anything. One of them has since died from AIDS ten years ago.

Full story: http://Recovering-Republican.com
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ConcernedArmyWife says:
by slappy_mcghee December 21, 2010 12:30 PM EST
I don't understand 1) why you think 2 couples need to be involved (that's realllly odd) nor 2) what question you think I'm dodging.

Try to be a bit more clear, please.

........................................................................
1)Sorry for the typo. Not "2 couples", I meant to say 2 heterosexuals (1 set of parents, 2 individuals).

2)What is your definition of normal and natural? I believe there is a thin line between the 2 words and just wanted your take on them since you use both terms when referring to homosexuality.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
by meboard December 21, 2010 10:37 AM EST
apuan777--and why do I need to reproduce? I have no desire to do so. I very happy to let the other 90% of the population have at it!!!!
-------------------
Because the human race would die off. If you want to live an individual lifestyle, and don't care about everyone else, then by all means, shut your mouth and go away.
reply
apuan777 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You have no desire to reproduce and further society. What do you expect me to say to a recluse who forces their ideology on me at every turn or calls me a bigot.
hakori replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777, forcing their ideology on you? What the heck are you talking about? You spout off your anti-gay intolerance like that's acceptable, and you say someone else is forcing their ideology on you? What are you doing? We all know you don't like gays--ok, fine. That's not the point. The point is should all Americans be treated equally under the law, and in a country that prides itself on equality, the answer is obvioulsy YES. Gays can be legally equal to you and you can still hate them. Get over it, Man. No on is forcing anything on you.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
by meboard December 21, 2010 10:46 AM EST
Because there are people in this world running around saying that the GLBT community needs to be fixed...no any people like that???

What if I told you that you are unnatural...that you are a freak of nature and that you need to be fixed because you are abnormal. Wouldn't you be a little put out???
------------
Fixed? That is sick. I would definitely encourage the exploration as to the root cause of homosexuality as I firmly believe it is not in the original design of the man and the woman.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
by meboard December 21, 2010 10:35 AM EST
by apuan777, ummmmm...because you are asserting that something has to be fixed when I'm saying there's not.
-----------
If you are so happy with the way things are, then why is the gay community so loud and unhappy!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
Look meboard...I'm not a hater. Everyone is a human in my book. I just firmly believe that homosexuality is a direct result of something gone amiss in the human body. I believe we should be looking at it differently than we do.
reply
apuan777 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Seriously meboard, I've yet to meet a homosexual that was happy being gay.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
Does anybody want to be homosexual as a life goal?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
MeBoard-
Face it, homosexuality has happened as a result of some type of alteration in the body. I can say that the original design of the man and woman does not encompass this type of orientation. Why is this such a hard theory to embrace?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
by meboard December 21, 2010 10:04 AM EST
Here's a clue dear...its not about reproduction. We have enough of that already in the world. Do you know any gay people???
----------------
Yes...and I would love to see if hormone therapy would cure them of their disease.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
apuan777 says:
meboard...From the beginning to now, has the homosexual population increased through reproduction?
reply
apuan777 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
So, in other words, NO!
See all 125 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right