Political Hotsheet
By

Robert Hendin, Jill Jackson /

CBS News/ October 28, 2010, 3:58 PM

Moderate Governance by the Next Congress? Fat Chance

AP

In 2006 and 2008 the Democratic Party expanded - not just in the number of seats it controlled in Congress, but in how it won those seats. The Democrats won the majority by expanding the ideological definition of the Democratic Party itself.

The move was the brainchild of then-House Democratic Campaign boss Rahm Emanuel -- he envisioned a" big tent" Democratic Party and brought in a group of legislators who would have never before considered themselves Democrats. Take Heath Shuler (pictured), the former NFL star, who is fiscally conservative and opposed to abortion rights. He was recruited by Emanuel to run in 2006. Now he's in a tough re-election battle.

This year, the GOP is threatening its own expansion -- but only in numbers. The Republican Party is on the verge of a huge gain in the House, but primarily in districts now held by conservative Democrats who occupy seats normally won by Republicans. In fact, 49 Democrats serving in the current Congress are in seats won by John McCain in 2008.

So what does this mean? The Democrats won by firmly taking over the middle and even the middle-right of the map. Now, the GOP is taking over only the right and far right. So who will be gone? The people who lose their seats in Congress will be the moderate or conservative Democrats. They are the ones who won conservative districts in the past two elections and now will lose to even more conservative Republicans.

The electoral map after this election may be more representative of where the country truly is. But the GOP won't necessarily be controlling the middle because representation and true governance are different things. The liberal Democrats are safe and the conservative Republicans are safe. In the last few elections, the seats that changed control of the House were those in the middle, and now the GOP is moving the middle to the right.

After President Obama's 2008 election, most analysts saw a permanent sway in the electorate. But looking at the numbers, it wasn't a landslide at all. Mr. Obama won with nearly 67 million votes, some 53 percent of the electorate. That means that 58 million people, 46 percent of the voting population, voted for McCain and didn't want Mr. Obama to win.

Two years later, the independent voters who went to Obama have left the Democrats after the White House pursued an aggressive legislative agenda (much of achieved) but failed to quickly turn around the economy. So in this election, many of those middle ground voters will vote for the Republicans.

But this election has not been about the political middle -- it has been about the extremes. And with so many toss-up elections this year -- meaning many close races -- nearly half of the voters in many districts will have wanted the other guy.

So what does that mean after November 2? It means that neither party will be able to govern from the middle because there will be very few moderates left in the House, if any. Conservative candidates running against the Obama/Pelosi agenda are not promising to govern from the middle. The prognosis for moderate governing, after a year of such negativity and hyper-partisanship, is not promising.


Robert Hendin and Jill Jackson are CBS News Senior Political Producers. You can read more of Jill's posts in Hotsheet here or follow her on Twitter. More of Robert's posts in Hotsheet are here and you can follow him on Twitter here.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
51 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
msimamaji says:
Jobs. That's the issue.

Before Americans cast their vote, they should remember these words:

"There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore."
Those are the sacred words of Carly Fiorina, California's Republican candidate for the Senate

On October 28, CBS published an article by John Gapper titled,"Obama must Learn to Love Big Business." Gapper tells everyone what they can expect once the GOP gets control of Congress.
Gapper argues that the jobs Carly Fiorina and other Republican CEO's shipped to China will never come back. Gapper favors trade agreements with South Korea, Panama, and Colombia, notorious for its anti-union terrorism, so corporations can off shore more American jobs to countries with cheap labor, supposedly they can get tax cuts for doing so.

In addition Gapper want to " ease restrictions on visas and work permits for foreign students who will otherwise take their skills elsewhere." In more direct language, Gapper wants to expand the so-called "guest worker" program, so that imported workers, who will work for slave labor wages, will take American jobs.

While Gapper suggests that we need to invest in a better trained labor force and a better infrastructure to attract multi-national businesses, he also wants drastic budget cuts. In other words, businesses want the benefits of a 21st century infrastructure, but they don't want to pay for it. As far as more education, we have millions of young people deeply in debt with college degrees who can't get jobs- simply because their jobs have either been outsourced or given to an imported work force

The only things the GOP guarantees are pink slips as corporations give jobs to cheaper labor. In fact, when Carly Fiorina laid off thousands of Hewlitt Packard employees, these employees were forced to train their slave labor work force that took over their jobs.

So if you vote Republican next week and get a pink slip just before Christmas remember, I warned you this would happen. I urge every one to vote Democratic ticket because the job you save may be your own.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
endurorob_5 says:
Just a slightly disonest article. It fails to mention that even though the dems had many moderates in their ranks they were controlled by the far left and they legislated to the far left. The article also decided that independents who recently voted for dems are now turning to repubs because of the economy. That makes it sound like theyare switching soley because of the economy. Once again failing to mention that independents who voted for Obama are dissapointed in his excesses and his lies.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
simpleconservative says:
Too bad they did not vote conservatively on the key issues. These folks are getting the broom because of their duplicity. It is one thing to talk conservatively on the campaign trail and quite another to have some personal integrity and vote conservatively after the arm twisting that goes on. I hope their replacements learn something, especially Republicans who run on a conservative message. We will hold their feet to the fire!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sharkboy234 says:
Democrats need to strive for house seats 39 of them keep going keep strivning for more...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
btrask3 says:
Robert and Jill, if you are suggesting that moderate means SPENDING as usual... you are right.

FAT CHANCE...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dibbs977 says:
Pelosi is a competent, intelligent and refined speaker. She has been vilified by bigoted bibliolators partly because she is a woman and because she is a educated voice of reason. Well designed social programs actually help the economy as they assist people to become tax paying citizens. If you do not have good social programs, you have increased crime and incarceration costs etc. All the hoopla about immigrants---well economists agree that they actually end up as a net positive when you look at the economy. As far as all the right wing issues like abortion and gays. We all want to stop abortions but the left actually know that it does not work to make it illegal---only running it underground (much like prohibition) and all people deserve to be free even if they have a different sexual orientation. As far as the medical issues---ever see a sick child who does not have care? I have. This great nation needs universal health care---period. The far right only want to promote ignorance, predjudice, violence and hate.
reply
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I don't have anything against Nancy Pelosi personally. However, I have never thought her a succinct,not powerful speaker. She has her heart intheright place, but Steney Hoyer would have been a better choice.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fredirish says:
I suspect that Republicans are going to be disappointed when they win a bunch of seats in Congress next week. Lowering taxes is politically impossible, cutting spending is politically impossible, and this leaves them in charge of a bad situation. The Republicans have one advantage, which they will surely exploit - they can raise taxes on the highest tax bracket. They won't touch Obamacare unless they intend to expand it. Does anyone really think that the Democrats didn't know that they would lose control of at least one house in the midterms?

Congressional Republicans know that America can't compete with other nations if the leading cause of bankruptcy is medical costs. It's a no-brainer. Congressional Republicans also know that the 2008 financial meltdown cannot be repeated. Republicans will be in charge and any Tea Party member who really wants to cut spending and lower taxes will be disciplined harshly by fellow Republicans. Karl Rove knows that the economy is issue number one, and he will not look kindly at Republicans that make other Republicans look bad. If unemployment doesn't improve substantially, Republicans will be blamed in 2012. Cutting taxes and spending is asking for an economic disaster, and Republicans know it.
reply
dibbs977 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
We all must work together to solve these difficult and complex problems. There are no quick easy answers to fixing the economy. The health care system was unsustainable the way it was---and the new system needs some adjusting. Rushing back into the hands of Republicans who only want to make money and could care less about the common worker and the environment, makes no sense to me.
ibsteve2u replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I would never say that cutting taxes is "politically impossible" for Republicans. Consider how Bush did it...

His co-conspirators were fully aware that our economy was already reeling from the cumulative impact of 30 years of "flood-up/trickle-down" economics, deregulation, and inequitable free trade - and the shock of 9/11 - and so tax cuts were fiscally irresponsible; economic suicide, even.

So what they did was launch the housing boom. I.e., the housing boom had TWO purposes: Drive the economy with housing and so conceal the fact that tax cuts only incentivize our wealthy to substitute cheaper offshore labor for American workers in all sectors where that is feasible, and the other, more obvious one of permitting the right people to make a whole lot of money playing both sides of the mortgage-backed securities pyramid.

What I'm trying to say is the Republicans either could run another equivalent scam to conceal the damage that yet another round of tax cuts for themselves would cause, or they could, perhaps, instead now rely upon the gift they received from their tools on the Supreme Court: The ability to inundate the American people with lies and so maintain power without going to the bother of concealing the ill-effects of their greed.

Or both.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hsr060 says:
If I'm an american, I'd put cash under the mattress.
reply
retm-w replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Why if the fed keeps printing press rolling it will be of as much value as Monoply money.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RobAla says:
The current Congress is about as far away from moderate as it gets. It is currently controlled by extremist left wing progressives. That is precisely why so many of them are about to be sent home.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TomMariner says:
Let me get this right -- The 111'th Congress not only ignored, but publically humiliated Republicans as they shoved the most radical agenda in history down their (and our) throats. And the Republicans are expected to play nice with their old bosses and let the hated legislation stay. And expect the Republicans to not use the dirty tricks that were dreamed up in the 111'th and now cast in concrete in Congressional rules. That does happen when you are arrogant enough to feel that you will be in power forever and have no need to pay attention to those who elected you.

Frankly, I hope that the Republicans do try to play nice with the Democrats, but with Senator Schumer in charge of the Senate and the President still rock solid set on the Agenda, I'm betting the other side is just not going to let that happen.
reply
dibbs977 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Dude sit down. Catch ur breath. Now take the medicines the VA prescribed. Now doesn't that feel a lot better? Everything will be just fine.
nearl451 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
In the next COngress, the leadership will have no choice but to make nice with the underling party......to get ANYTHING passed. AND will need to placate POTUS as well, since there are not enough votes there to override ANY veto.
See all 51 Comments