Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ October 27, 2010, 2:00 PM

Poll: Four in Five Want New Blood in Congress

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.
CBS

Here's more evidence that it is a dire year to be an incumbent running for re-election: A new CBS News/New York Times poll taken shortly before the midterm elections finds that 80 percent of likely voters say that most members of Congress should be replaced with someone new.

Just 8 percent say most members deserve re-election.

While Congress has long been unpopular, the numbers are worse for incumbents than they were in the 2006 midterm elections. Then, 16 percent said members deserved re-election while 69 percent wanted someone new.

Voters are somewhat more positive about their own member of Congress - but perceptions are still negative. Just 34 percent say their representative deserves re-election, while 58 percent say their representative does not deserve two more years in office.

In 2006, by contrast, roughly one in two said their member deserved to keep his or her job, while 42 percent said it was time for a replacement.

In a troubling sign for Democrats, it is Republican voters who appear to be paying more attention to the campaign. Sixty-four percent of Republican likely voters say they are paying "a lot" of attention, compared to 47 percent of Democrats (and 51 percent of independents).

Overall, 54 percent of likely voters say they are paying a lot of attention to the campaign. Thirty-four percent say they are paying some attention, and 11 percent say they are paying little or no attention.

This is an early release of a portion of the poll of 1,173* (note: this number has been corrected from 1,189) adults nationwide, which was taken between October 22nd and 26th. The full survey will be released at 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time.


This poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,173 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone October 22-26, 2010, including 1086 registered voters, and 1055 likely voters. The effective number of likely voters is 463. Phone numbers were dialed from RDD samples of both standard land-lines and cell phones. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus three percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher. This poll release conforms to the Standards of Disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
47 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hhandyman says:
When Mr No Mitch McConnel is eliminated from his office then we mayh have a chance at a governnent that acutaly cares about the common man and not the elete Lobbyist crew that fund the campeigns unfairly or give us the tons of negitive advertisment that trys to negate voting alltogether.
Tern limits work especally when put in affect by the general public vote an its time the General public ran for office and rid our nation of the Laywers and doctors that attempt to protect us from us with too many restraints true if we have an accident the graveyard expands it will anyway.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
edlarson says:
Dear voter,

As you know election time is here again. This year dozens of lawmakers are going to lose their jobs and they'll have to pack their stuff and go back home. This is a difficult time for them and moving is expensive. Unfortunately the taxpayers will probably have to pick up most of this expense. If only there was a way to help speed these former lawmakers on their way and also reduce the cost to the taxpayers.

Well now there is! It's called a Box-a-gram!

A boxagram is a moving box that we will send to your elected representative with a note from you! A note that says, "You're Fired! Here's a box, now go clean out your desk!" is one example of what your Box-a-gram could say!


What Fun!

Take a moment and visit www.boxagrams.com and check it out!

A storm is coming! A storm of boxes!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
subframer says:
And this should be the way we (the electorate) roll in every election cycle. If you go to DC and play the usual games, lie to constituents, disregard the will of those that sent you there, you will be OUT in one cycle. We can't count on the idiots in Harlem, since they seem to like Charlie Rangel no matter how corrupt he is, but in general we should be able to scare these feckless pols into doing what WE sent them to do.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,
Just 8 percent say most members deserve re-election..

il est vrai qu'un congr?s" a besoin de sang neuf, r?elire les m?mes membres pour continuer ? faire si?ste ne servirait ? rien. au revoir
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amusedbyitall says:
I am becoming a political conservative. Not a social conservative. I am already a fiscal conservative that believes that the Tea Party is just a lot of wind with no useful answers. I wish to go back to the days in politics when moderates ruled. When legislators could sit down and discuss their views without name calling or be beholding to a strict dogma. When one side lost and went on to the next issue without demanding a stage to beat a dead horse. Most voters don't remember when politics were used as checks and balances to eliminate the extremes. Those old days when this country worked and we were one society with differing views. Politics is now a game of winning and losing no matter what the price and run by spoiled children.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JRC_903 says:
This will not be the last time that voters try to cure what is wrong with American by blaming everyone but those responsible. When the SC decided that corporations were entitled to the same rights as human beings--- things started getting very interesting. While corps can still not vote--- it doesn't seem to matter. The simple fact is that when you hear someone repeating what they've been programmed to say-- just like what they've been programmed to buy.. you begin to appreciate what is truly great about capitalism. For with those dollars they can spawn such a fabric of deception that Huxley and Orwell could never have began to imagine that the doublespeak would not be coming from the government as much as from private corporations. But yet--- these people "refeudiate" the very concept that maybe the government(while evil) is not quite as evil as those who(corporations) just happen to have an even greater vested interest in pulling the GD wool over people's eyes. Has anyone ever wondered why people spends millions of dollars to win an elected office paying 150k/year. The amount of entropy in the political system is is not fully accounted for by merely totaling all of the visible finances. I don't have a legal answer for this problem. But suppose it was not unconstitutional to limit the amount of money people or things could spend on getting elected? Suppose that people who went to Washington served under hardship-- and when their two year term was up.. they could not wait to get back to making money in the private sector. Maybe no one would want to run.. but don't you think that the decisions they made while they were down there might be at least an order of a magnitude better then now--where their first consideration is always "How will this affect my chances of getting reelected"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
billpl-2009 says:
stupid is who stupid votes for
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JRC_903 says:
I think it maybe non logical to believe that the house will remain in democratic hands. I think what is about to happening is somewhat analogous waking up sick to your stomach. While the natural thing maybe to resist the urge to vomit. In my experience, you might just as well get it over with---because its going to happen either way. Only then will you start to feel better. I hope and pray that as soon as the republicans control the house, they will stop their childish obstructionism and start working with the other side to at least put a happy face on what is wrong with this country.
reply
Mortarman429 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Childish obstructionism? What about the Democrats and Obama not working with the GOP?
thanksgreed replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama is one of you, cement
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Amusedbyitall says:
The voters just want blood, figuratively.
reply
thanksgreed replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TP wants literal blood.... the sickos
Mortarman429 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thanksgreed knows sicko!!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thesevenveils says:
How about everyone demanding term limits of all elected politicians! State and local and federal.
reply
See all 47 Comments