Will Dems Squeeze Out Michele Bachmann -- After November?
AP
The Minnesota Republican Party is warning that Democrats in the state may try and squeeze Rep. Michele Bachmann out of office, the New York Times reports -- not by defeating her this November, but by eliminating her district when the state redraws its congressional map next year.
Bachmann's campaign tells Hotsheet redistricting isn't a concern. "We're focusing on winning big in November," campaign spokesman Sergio Gor said.
The Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party also dismissed the issue, telling the Times they had no such plans to kick the outspoken Tea Party conservative out of Congress by getting rid of her district.
The reality, however, is that Midwesterners are likely to have fewer congressional representatives after this year due to the results of the Census. Congressional seats are allotted based on the Census counts from each state, and the population is growing faster in Southern and Western states.
Midwestern states made concerted efforts to get full Census participation, the Times reports. Ironically, Bachmann may have detracted from those efforts. Last year, the congresswoman decried the Census, arguing that there were too many personal questions asked. She said she and her family would only partially fill out their Census forms. Other Republicans urged her to rethink her position.
Gor would not comment on whether Bachmann fully filled out the Census and reiterated their focus on the race against Democrat Tarryl Clark in the safely Republican district.
"We've got 34 days until victory," he said.
CBSNews.com Special Report: Campaign 2010
Popular in Politics
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 162 Comments
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 327 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 346 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 262 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 243 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 416 Comments
Michelle Bachmann has accomplished nothing for the people of her district except to make an national ass of herself while she humiliated her constituents.
Michelle Bachmann hoist on her own petard ? what a pretty picture.
I wonder, do you think anyone can communicate irony to a fundamentalist?
Michelle Bachmann is a notorious liar. She has told lies that were recorded on video tape then denied that she said the things that she obviously and explicitly said. Yet she runs on the Fundamentalist Christian ticket, with a Fundamentalist Christian agenda of no abortion rights, no gay rights, plus extra rights for Christians along with the conflation of right-wing economics as somehow essentially Christian.
The woman has done nothing for Minnesota. She has not authored a single bill that passed. She is a primary factor in the increasing poverty in her district, yet church busses of voter come to vote for her. Michelle Bachmann is a symbol of the failure of American Christianity to live up to Christian principles.
What I do know is that the electoral college is that it should be totally eliminated.
This group was responsible for electing George W. H. Bush president of the United States.
As an American citizen, we should demand the electoral college be eliminated and disbanded and we would know that our one man vote counts.
While we will never know what state our Country would be in had Gore been elected (he received the most popular votes) I regret we never had the opportunity to find out because of the electoral college.
Our entire election system needs to be overhauled, and I have a few suggestions what this overhaul should include.
Unfortunately, as only one vote, I will never see anything change.
Tnhe government doesn't want to give up one ounce of control it has over the people of the United States, and Obama is seeking to take away more of our freedoms by attempting to diminish the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Please explain just what Obama has done to diminish the Constitution.
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. Elections wouldn't be about winning states. Every vote would be counted for and directly assist the candidate for whom it was cast. Candidates would need to care about voters across the nation, not just undecided voters in a handful of swing states.
The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes--that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for president. It does not abolish the Electoral College, which would need a constitutional amendment, and could be stopped by states with as little as 3% of the U.S. population. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action, without federal constitutional amendments.
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers, in 21 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas (6), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), The District of Columbia (3), Maine (4), Michigan (17), Nevada (5), New Mexico (5), New York (31), North Carolina (15), and Oregon (7), and both houses in California (55), Colorado (9), Hawaii (4), Illinois (21), New Jersey (15), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (12), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), and Washington (11). The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington. These six states possess 73 electoral votes -- 27% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com