Illegal Immigration Declining, Report Shows
CBS/AP
The number of undocumented immigrants living in the United States has declined significantly for the first time in two decades, according to a report from the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center. The population of undocumented immigrants fell by 8 percent to 11.1 million in March 2009, compared with a peak of 12 million in March 2007.
The drop in the population can be attributed to the reduced flow of illegal immigrants coming into the United States. It fell by nearly two-thirds in the period between 2007 and 2009 when compared to the period between 2000 and 2005, according to Pew.
The number of undocumented immigrants fell in three states between 2008 and 2009, Pew found: Florida, Nevada and Virginia. Additionally, the combined population of illegal immigrants in Arizona, Colorado and Utah also decreased from 2008 to 2009.
The new figures add context to the renewed national debate over illegal immigration, which gained steam after Arizona enacted a new, controversial law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally.
While Arizona, Colorado and Utah combined may have hosted fewer undocumented immigrants in 2009 than in 2008, the report also shows that undocumented immigrants made up 5.8 percent of Arizona's total population in 2009. The only states in which undocumented immigrants make up a larger share of the population are California, Nevada and Texas.
The Pew report did not explore the reasons for the overall decline in the number of incoming illegal immigrants. However, a variety of factors could be at work, from the poor economy, to new policies enacted in the United States and elsewhere, as well as increased enforcement of immigration laws. The Obama administration has emphasized this year that it has placed "unprecedented" resources at the Southern border. Deportations of illegal immigrants are up under President Obama.
The Pew report's findings were praised by Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates tighter immigration controls, the Washington Post reports.
The figures contradict "the idea that the only options before us are mass expulsions or mass amnesty," he said. "This finding points to the middle way, of a consistent decrease of the illegal population over time through enforcement."
Popular in Politics
- For GOP, scandals could be an electoral plus - or minus 320 Comments
- IRS targeting overlooked biggest soft money groups
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 344 Comments
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 147 Comments
- Republicans use IRS scandal to tar Obamacare
- Ousted IRS chief: "I did not mislead" the American people 262 Comments
- Where is the Benghazi cover-up Republicans promised? 408 Comments
- Why Obama should worry that current scandals might impact 2016 242 Comments














he Art of Propaganda: 7 Common Tactics Used to Influence Behavior
In 1939, the New York-based Institute for Propaganda Analysis published an article on the seven common propaganda devices with the aim of encouraging critical, rational thinking amongst citizens.
Here are the seven common propaganda devices:
1. Name-calling
This involves the use of words to connect a person or idea to a negative concept. The aim is to make a person reject something without examining the evidence because of the negative associations attached to it.
Examples of words include ?Terrorist?, ?Nazi? and ?Queer?.
Name Calling is used as a substitute for arguing the merits of an idea, belief, or proposal. It is often employed using sarcasm and ridicule in political cartoons and writing.
2. Glittering Generalities
The opposite of name-calling, this involves the use of highly valued concepts and beliefs which attract general approval and acclaim. These are vague, emotionally attractive words like ?freedom?, ?honor? and ?love?.
This method works because these concepts/words mean different things to different people, while still having a positive implication.
When someone talks to us about democracy, we immediately think of our own definite ideas about democracy, the ideas we learned at home, at school, and in church.
Our first and natural reaction is to assume that the speaker is using the word in our sense, that he believes as we do on this important subject. This lowers our ?sales resistance? and makes us far less suspicious..
the other 5 @ http://politheo.com/artofpropaganda.html
********
You'd expect the TeaBaggers and most Repugs to be happy the border is being secured, better than at any other time in the last 10years - but for a dumb Repug, that would mean praising the efforts of the POTUS Obama to secure our border and they simply CANNOT do that. Dumb Dumb Repugs and Thx POTUS Obama.
But, I really wonder, HOW the Pew Group could
actually determine that illegal immigration is declining?!
It would seem to me, due to the illegal nature of the activity,
that it would be nearly impossible, if not impossible, to come
to such a definitive conclusion!
But, it looks like great numbers of peoples are STILL illegally
crossing into America...so, I think this 'think tank', better
do a 're-think' on the matter!