September 1, 2010 11:26 AM

How Alaska's Joe Miller Managed Stunning Upset over Lisa Murkowski

By
Stephanie Condon
Topics
Republicans ,
Campaign 2010
(Credit: AP)

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski conceded last night to her Republican primary challenger Joe Miller in one of the most surprising and significant upsets of the midterm elections so far.

Miller's victory defied the all the odds and the conventional wisdom that a well-known, powerful incumbent like Murkowski should have no problem securing her party's nomination. Murkowski, however, failed to put her resources to use and seemingly underestimated the effectiveness of the Tea Party, which helped Miller portray the senator as too liberal for the state.

Murkowski's defeat makes her the third sitting senator this year to fail to even win a primary. These losses, plus the number of senators retiring, means at least 15 new members will join the Senate next year. Since the Constitution was amended to allow for the direct election of senators, the record number of freshmen to join the Senate at once is 20, according to Politico.

However, the surprising Alaska primary hardly marks a trend, contend some political observers like Prof. Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.

Tossing out incumbent senators is certainly not a typical move -- since 1982, the re-election rate for senate incumbents has been between 75 percent and 96 percent during every two-year every election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. This year is no different -- as of now, 339 incumbent members of the House and Senate have been successfully re-nominated this year, with only 7 defeated, according to Sabato. That's a 98 percent re-nomination rate.

A number of Democratic incumbents, particularly in the House, are expected to lose this November, Sabato told the Hotsheet, making this an anti-Democrat year rather than an anti-incumbent year.

So what happened in Alaska?

"Murkowski could have beaten Miller handily," Sabato said. "Murkowski has no one to blame but herself. Incredibly, she didn't take Miller seriously and refused to spend her gobs of money. She could have swamped Miller, and this election wouldn't even have been close."

Lisa Murkowski Concedes Alaska Primary Race
Alaska Libertarian Party Rejects Possible Murkowski Bid
Palin's Support May Topple Murkowski in Alaska
CBSNews.com Special Report: Campaign 2010

Indeed, the Center for Responsive Politics reports that Murkowski raised more than 12 times what Miller raised in this election. The Center also reports she spent more than 10 times what her opponent spent. However, the Alaska Dispatch reports that Murkowski had more than $1.8 million left in her campaign treasury as of Aug. 4, and no debt.

Murkowski could have used her money to respond to attacks from Miller's supporters, or go on the offensive against the challenger. However, the Dispatch reports, Murkowski refused to go negative even as the Tea Party Express launched ads attacking Murkowski as an entrenched political insider who too often conceded to Democrats.

The Tea Party Express spent $550,000 to help Miller, dumping $314,000 into mostly television and radio ads in just the last week before the Aug. 24 primary. Support from former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin also boosted Miller's Tea Party credentials; Palin helped promote a Tea Party express "money bomb" for Miller.

One Tea Party Express ad chided that "the Senate seat currently being occupied by Lisa Murkowski doesn't belong to Wall Street lobbyists or the Murkowski family." Another ad blasted Murkowski as too "liberal" because she has voted with Democrats hundreds of times.

Murkowski was certainly not the staunch, hardcore conservative conservative senator that Miller will likely prove to be if he wins the general election.

Alaska has lost a senator with a leadership position, and now the Senate has even less chance of passing an energy bill. As ranking Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, she made some efforts to add conservative ideas to the Democrats' debate over climate change legislation, an issue that some contend contributed to her defeat.

Should he win this November, Miller will be one of a fair number of recruits for an unofficial Senate Tea Party caucus, Sabato said.

Democrats, meanwhile, are hoping they may now chance, however small, of winning a second Senate seat in Alaska with little-known candidate Scott McAdams However, a National Republican Senatorial Committee poll released Monday showed Miller with a 16-point lead over McAdams.


Add a Comment See all 288 Comments
by slappy-jones September 2, 2010 4:39 PM EDT
Coming from you, Joe, a liberal is anyone who isn't one of the Religious Right, so it means nothing.

.
Reply to this comment
by slappy-jones September 2, 2010 4:38 PM EDT
by Empire--George September 2, 2010 4:17 PM EDT
hate to break it to you, Liberal......Protecting intellectual property or copyrighted material from Plagiarism is not crying, by any stretch of the imagination, even in the mind of a twisted sicko like yourself.

========

So you think your phrase is intellectual property, but a screen name isn't.

Another of your famous idiotic double standards.

.
Reply to this comment
by slappy-jones September 2, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
by Empire--George September 2, 2010 1:20 PM EDT
Plagiarism.....I came up with the phrase you are using.....and it was in response to Obama's Hope and Change tour.....carry on

==================

Funny to see you CRYING about 'your' phrase.

You don't own it, Joe.

You have no end to your double standards, do you???

.
Reply to this comment
by slappy-jones September 2, 2010 4:06 PM EDT
Actually, I'm no lib, Josephine. I just don't support your type which thinks you have to be pro-war, pro-religion, and anti-choice to be a conservative.

I especially enjoy pointing out your hypocrisies, and you have SO many! Just yesterday you said I cried that someone had 'stolen' my screen name. Now today you are crying that someone 'stole' your phrase.

You just choose not to see your own hypocrisy, so I'll illustrate it for you EVERY time.

If you don't want my attention, quit posting, moron.
by slappy-jones September 2, 2010 4:08 PM EDT
"Plagiarism.....I came up with the phrase you are using...."

WAAAAAHH! Waa.. waa. WAAHHHH!!
by dodinyc September 2, 2010 2:23 PM EDT
Miller says he doesn't want the federal aid...oh, all he want instead is the federal land and the billions of barrels of oil underneath it to go to the Alaskan people rather than America who owns it. Talk about a redistribution of wealth! Total hypocrisy!
Reply to this comment
by consh8theusa September 2, 2010 12:23 PM EDT
OK, I admit that Palin can help to get extremists, idiots and morons on the ticket, but are they who we want in power is the question?
Reply to this comment
by BaselessCritique September 2, 2010 11:08 AM EDT
If this doofus were to be king for a day and implement his idea of not accepting the 85% taxpayer-paid subsidy that Alaska currently gets, the state would be plunged into chaos, as basic services come to a halt.

The same crackpots that elected this guy, the ones who beat their chest and bluster on about the evils of taxes and the EPA, will be standing there holding the tar and the feathers, refusing to accept that they created the propblem in the first place.

In all likelihood, Alaska will now have two democractic senators. Palin has sabotaged Republican attempts to win a senate majority in order to show Murkowski who was more powerful.

The big message here is that Palin is emotionally unbalanced. She puts her own vendetta ahead of the good of the Republican party, ahead of the good of the country.
Reply to this comment
by steeepe September 2, 2010 12:02 PM EDT
Miller was heavily supported by those titans of far right-wing politics, the Koch brothers. I wonder if the "rank- and-file" tea partiers understand that their "movement" is financed by Dick Armey and the Kochs. The tea parties are complete dupes for the far right wing. The GOP is bad enough, but get these tea party lunatics elected and say goodbye to America the beautiful.
by wdh3007 September 2, 2010 2:27 AM EDT
Yeah in two months it will be "How the Tea Party pulled a huge upset across America."
Reply to this comment
by slappy-jones September 1, 2010 11:58 PM EDT
by jschmidt27
All the Democrat controlled states definitely could use fiscal conservtism."

Agreed. But I think all states need it - I'd love to have some good examples of states with responsible spending.



"And we need immigration laws enforced."

No question. Long overdue. I was so surprised when Reagan gave amnesty to 4 million illegals - I thought surely something would be done after that.


"But the abortion and gay issue is where Republicans use the Northeast and California. Do we take a chance alienating those sections? We need to make sure Republicans get in."

Agreed again. That's the problem with the Religious Right in its role in the Republican party. It makes the party look like it has a religious bent to it, when that shouldn't be there.

We need a party which appeals to all fiscal conservatives, not just social conservatives.


.
Reply to this comment
by Rodeo_Joe September 1, 2010 10:08 PM EDT
T.G. I don't live in Alaska.
Reply to this comment
by Brian5013MS September 1, 2010 9:17 PM EDT
Palin Power!!!!! Sarah Palin [2012]

Palin / Beck 2012
Reply to this comment
by slappy-jones September 1, 2010 11:10 PM EDT
I hear you. I just hope they don't run as Republicans.
by Brian5013MS September 1, 2010 11:16 PM EDT
Hi slow. Saw you trolling for victims today lol.
See all 288 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook