Palin Blasts Labor Leader, Calls Conservatism a Better Fit for Union Workers
AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin on Thursday night responded to an attack from the president of the AFL-CIO, refusing to back down from her claim that union leaders behave like "thugs." While blasting union leadership for using "scare tactics" to promote a "big government agenda," Palin painted herself as a better representative of union members and blue collar workers.
Yesterday during a speech he delivered in Alaska, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka called Palin "almost a parody of herself" who will "go down in history like McCarthy."
"In this charged political environment, her kind of talk gets dangerous," Trumka said at the Alaska AFL-CIO Biennial Convention. "'Don't retreat... reload' may seem clever, the kind of bull you hear all the time, but put it in context. She's using crosshairs to illustrate targeted legislators. She's on the wrong side of the line there. She's getting close to calling for violence. And some of her fans take that stuff seriously."
Trumka also criticized Palin for referencing "union thugs," a loaded term given the history of labor unions in the United States.
Palin initially responded via Twitter but wrote a longer response on Facebook. She said it was "ironic" that a union boss would accuse her of threatening violence, citing "attempts by SEIU to intimidate those who wanted to make their voices heard in last year's town halls," as well as Trumka's involvement in the 1990's in a union corruption case.
By contrast, Palin said, "I was just an ordinary, card-carrying union member, not one of the big shots who ended up, unfortunately, giving unions a bad name." Palin boasted she is "a former card-carrying IBEW sister married to a proud former IBEW and later USW member."
The former GOP vice presidential candidate implored her "hardworking, patriotic brothers and sisters in the labor movement" to disavow labor union "nonsense," such as backing the "government takeover" of the auto industry.
"There is a different home for you: the commonsense conservative movement," she said. "It cares about the same things you and I care about: a government that doesn't spend beyond its means, an economy focused on creating good jobs with good wages, and a leadership that is proud of America's achievements and doesn't go around apologizing to everyone for who we are."
Palin also blasted the so-called "card check legislation that some characterize as being unfair to workers, and even un-American, because of its insistence on stripping workers of their right to privacy with a secret ballot."
"Card check" refers to the Employee Free Choice Act -- legislation that would eliminate employers' ability to demand a secret-ballot election during the union-forming process, thereby streamlining the process of union organizing. Other main components of the bill include increased penalties on employers who violate labor laws in trying to dissuade employees from organizing. The bill is highly contentious, with most opposition coming from businesses, and appears to be making no progress in Congress.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 436 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 131 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1204 Comments
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado 89 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 177 Comments














skyk1
Just like obama thinks there are 57 States.
+++++
That is not what he said, he was speaking of US controlled territories.
until she stoled enough money from Alaska so he could quit
Go away Sara, if you don't like the US go to Russia
---
Like provoking chants of "kill, kill, kill" at her rallies during the campaign........
---
There is no such thing.
Conservatives believe in imaginary beings and places.
Nothing common sense about that at all, unless you're 3 years old and playing "tea"......
So you DO believe that those who own and operate corporations are entitled to use weapons such as currency exchange rates against the American people - as long as the law permits that.
Hence, my belief that the American people vote for the right - the Republicans or "Tea Partiers" - at their own peril, for if the right is allowed to have any power at all, they will continue to use weapons that are outside of the control of the American worker against that worker and her family.
The fact is the right, as Nmmrng so ably emphasizes, thinks of the American worker - the American PEOPLE - as their enemy, and they ARE using weapons like currency exchange rates against the American people, and they believe that is their RIGHT.
I do not. I call for booting all of the right - the Republicans, "Tea Partiers", whatever - completely out of our government.
And out of America, if at all possible; Americans should not tolerate the presence of those who unabashedly claim the right to abuse them. Let them go to the nations where they send the jobs of our people.
You just can't handle the truth Nmmrng.
That last sentence is why the few who own and operate our corporations purchased inequitable free trade. Once "flood-up/trickle-down" economics had unleashed their greed by making the penalty for excessive greed only more money, of course they looked around for what restrained their ability to divert more of America's wealth into their own pockets.
Financial laws that protected the American people were an obvious choice, so we got deregulation.
And the American worker himself...his care and feeding were expensive, when currency exchange rates made it possible to pay offshore workers 1/10th or less...so Voila! Inequitable free trade.
Me, I could fix that FAST. Just adjust all currency exchange rates to reflect what living space, food, medical care, and the other necessities of life cost nation to nation. I.e., the price of a meal in America would buy you a meal in China - not 20 meals in China as it does now.
That is why the American worker "seems" expensive; the exchange rates are way out of whack. And the few - the right - are using those artificial differences to force the American people out of their jobs. Their goal is indeed to make the pay of an American worker equivalent to what they pay "per day in other countries" - but WITHOUT dropping the prices that they charge us for the goods and services that they sell us.
The end effect would be that the American worker would be far, far worse off than his artificially-advantaged offshore competition, because the right - the Republicans - want to pay American workers Chinese wages while forcing American workers to pay American prices for food, utilities, housing, etc. etc. etc.
The choice before the American people is simple and remains the same: Do you want to help to secure a future for America's children, or do you want to help the right - whether they call themselves "Republicans", or "Tea Partiers" - to steal it?