August 25, 2010 2:25 PM

Alaska Primary Results: If Joe Miller Pulls Out Win Over Lisa Murkowsi, Will Alaskans Really Turn Backs on Federal Government Largess?

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Campaign 2010

Republican candidate for U.S. Senate Joe Miller, center, smiles as he visits with supporters in Anchorage, Alaska Tuesday Aug. 24, 2010.

(Credit: AP)
Joe Miller, the Tea Party and Sarah Palin-backed lawyer and military veteran who may be on the verge of a shocking upset victory over Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Alaska Republican Senate primary, is an unblinking conservative who believes "ObamaCare" and cap and trade legislation are unconstitutional and wants to eliminate the Department of Education and phase out Medicare and Social Security.

He has also taken a strong position when it comes to earmarks and what he sees as irresponsible federal government spending. "This concept that we have of senators and representatives being elected to bring back the pork is the reason that were at the point were at," he argues.

While that position may fit well with the Tea Party orthodoxy, it is somewhat striking coming from an Alaska politician. That's because despite the rugged individualist image of the state, it is a massive beneficiary of federal government largess.

Through May the state had taken in over $3,000 per capita in stimulus money, more than any other state by far and more than double the national average, as the New York Times reports. It has a lower unemployment rate than the most states in large part because of all the federal money. Federal spending there is 71 percent higher than the national average.

Alaska's politicians have long taken pride in bringing home the federal bacon. Former Sen. Ted Stevens, a Republican, was known for being unabashed about bringing a steady stream of federal money back home, and Murkowsi landed a seat on the Appropriations committee that allowed her to steer money back to her state.

There has long been a disconnect in Alaska between the rhetoric and reality in a state where lawmakers rail against the stimulus bill before taking what some see as more than their fair share of it. Republican state lawmaker Carl Gatto's comment to the Times is telling: Though he wants to "roll back the federal government," he admits: "I'll give the federal government credit: they sure give us a ton of money. For every $1 we give them in taxes for highways, they give us back $5.76."

"We Alaskans have a fierce independent streak, fiercer than you can measure in a poll," Matthew Felling, anchor at CBS Anchorage affiliate KTVA, told Hotsheet. "And while the federal funds coming to Alaska are either welcomed or permitted -- depends who you're talking to -- the demands or strings that come with them are seen warily."

Miller has constantly insisted that the pork has to end. And while his potential victory may ultimately be more attributable to Palin's political machine and an abortion-related ballot initiative that helped drive his supporters to the polls than his message on spending, Alaskans may well have essentially elected a man who has vowed to no longer have Alaska be propped up by the rest of the country. (The Republican nominee, whether Miller or Murkowski, is strongly favored in the general election.)

If Miller gets to the Senate, watch to see whether he follows through on his promise to move away Alaska from being what critics have deemed a "welfare state" or instead keeps steering a disproportionate share of federal government money to his state even while railing against federal government spending.

More election coverage:

Rick Scott Win: Bad News for Republicans?
Scott Gets GOP Nomination for Fla. Governor
Meek Wins Florida Democratic Senate Primary
Murkowski Trails in Tight Alaska Primary
Alaska Election Results Provide a Boost to Palin
McCain Wins GOP Nomination for Senate in Ariz.
Arizona Primary Results: Ben Quayle Wins


Add a Comment
by pijoe123 August 25, 2010 5:50 PM EDT
Largess? Alaskans have been paying for pork projects to the lower 48 for over 50 yrs. To this day we have one 2-lane road from Anchorage to Fairbanks (roughly the middle of the state) and a dirt road north beyond that. We don't even have a road to the state capital. While the good folks of the lower 48 have roads to every tiny Hamlet in every state.

Example: Highway to Keywest cost 200 Mil in 1955. 2010 dollars 1.6 Bil. Pop in 1955 is about the same as today...25K. Our capital of Juneau has a larger population and gets more cruise ship visitors than Key West every year. But mention Fed funds for a highway to Juneau (that would bring tourists by the millions) and it's a road to nowhere. We SHOULD get more Fed funds for projects because our infrastructure is decades behind other states.
Reply to this comment
by MurdochSucks August 25, 2010 6:21 PM EDT
Perhaps if Alaska produced anything besides debt you would be able to get more funding. The fact is you get twice as much in federal money than you pay in tax. Can you say welfare state? Yet, it is overrun with Republicans that hate welfare for citizens. It's quite hilarious in its idiocy, really.
by MurdochSucks August 25, 2010 4:58 PM EDT
Yep, the Republicans are imploding. They are electing another radical, far right wing nut job as their candidate, AGAIN? Haven't they learned from Sharron Angle and Rand Paul, that voting in the extremist is only going to lose them more seats to the Democrats in November? Idiots.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook