House Raps Rep. Maxine Waters on Ethics Charge
Updated at 3:37 p.m. ET
Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters today proclaimed her innocence concerning charges of ethics violations made by the House Ethics Committee and said she will participate in a public hearing rather than admit to any wrongdoing.
"I have not violated any House rules," Waters said in a statement today. "Therefore, I simply will not be forced to admit to something I did not do."
The House Ethics Committee this afternoon announced in a statement that it has formed an "adjudicatory subcommittee" to consider ethics violations charges against Waters. The subcommittee has yet to determine when it will meet. The committee also today released an 80-page report, submitted in August 2009 by the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), detailing the allegations against Waters.
The investigation pertains to the assistance Waters gave to a bank to which she had personal connections in getting federal bailout money.
In 2008, Waters organized a meeting between Treasury officials and executives from OneUnited Bank, where her husband was once a board member and had large investments. The bank received $12 million from the federal government's Troubled Asset Relief Program. Waters, who serves on the House Financial Services Committee, has defended her request for the meeting as part of her efforts to advocate on behalf of minority-owned businesses.
"The record will clearly show that in advocating on behalf of minority banks neither my office nor I benefited in any way, engaged in improper action or influenced anyone," Waters said in her statement today. "Additionally, the OCE acknowledges that I have fully disclosed my assets as required by House rules, even going above and beyond the requirements by disclosing my assets at several Financial Services Committee hearings. In sum, the case against me has no merit."
Waters says in her statement that the meeting in question was requested and scheduled on behalf of the National Bankers Association (NBA), a trade organization that represents the interests of minority-owned banks, not on behalf of OneUnited Bank. She also emphasizes that the meeting -- which she did not attend -- resulted in no action.The OCE report says that Waters told the OCE that she requested the meeting on behalf of Robert Cooper and Kevin Cohee. According to the report, "At the time of the request, Mr. Cooper identified himself as the Chairman-elect of the National Bankers Association (NBA) and also as Vice-President and Senior Counsel for OneUnited. Mr. Cohee was one of the principle founders of OneUnited and the Chairman and CEO of the bank."
Waters said today the OCE has "drawn negative inferences where there are none and twisted facts to fit its faulty conclusions. After a lengthy investigation, the report released today only shows: No benefit, no improper action, no failure to disclose, no one influenced: no case."
Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel of New York will also face an ethics trial this fall. The trials stand in stark contrast to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's promise to "drain the Swamp" of corruption, and it poses a challenge for Democrats heading into the fall midterm elections. Rangel recently released via Twitter an audio statement in which he defends himself.
Popular in Politics
- IRS' Lerner: "I have not done anything wrong" 661 Comments
- Obama to view Oklahoma tornado damage Sunday
- Christie: Keep politics out of Oklahoma disaster relief
- Former Miss America might challenge McConnell
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 120 Comments
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test 68 Comments
- WH says criticism of its handling of IRS story is "legitimate"















Well, we've given you many actual inaccuracies in the bible, but you haven't ruled it out. What makes you think those other books are less wrong?
"Christianity is not a list of "Thous Shalt Nots!" It, unlike every other religion, is a personal relationship."
So people in other religions don't take their relationships with god as personal? That seems impossible, especially when belief is involved.
.
I would not refute it if god plopped down on my couch.
by Mortar_29 August 2, 2010 9:21 PM EDT
Yes you would, Slow. You would look for some other reason for this guy sitting on your couch.
That is what I am talking about. If you seek the truth, then you let it go where it takes you."
I would not, in fact, refute it if he plopped down on my couch.
You apparently don't know much about me, Mort. I love concrete proof.
in a mosque once, i noticed the muffins fast and intelligent, the grenades sweet and kind and sexy and wow divine . but i wasn't there for muffins and sex toys . i was there to learn to sit still . quite literally . i can't sit still . i spent a few weeks there, just practicing patience . i'd sit for hours inside . for hours outside . i'd sit alone . i'd sit with others . i'd sit with kids . i'd sit with old folk . at this one, i never sat naked, i never got punished . i prayed alot more than usual . i was alot more thankful than usual . i noticed alot more of the world around me than usual . i breathed alot more deep and slow and more often than usual (very good for ones mind and body and awareness and overall engine) . i was by far less possessed by the voices and pictures in my minds than usual . i was more happy . more reflective . more intuitive . more confused, though . like learning to speak a new language . looking at folk and people and creatures big and small when one does not presume to know and comprehend what they are saying and doing and referencing and why . maybe they'll build some churches and totems and such that drift places like the grand canyon . then i'll try to sit still again .. pounds (kilograms) per square inch (centimeter) .. surface area and density
congresses and congregations and tribes and gangs and other organizations and groups should bother less about such energy solutions, and more about unigque individual diary folk toddler and other and their microscopic and macroscopic and exterior and interior and other gardens furniture foliage and bus and toy and sport and puzzle and med and math
some of the endless eternal cosmic war babies with the limitless spank me fetishes kept lighting their lunch muffins and buffets and wagons on fire and screaming lets save them lets save them . i tried to play time and time again for whole hours . at long last they got the game fine tuned and sensible . them being them, they then changed all over again until it was crazy and strange and difficult and dangerous . there are other games along the sick bed curbsides, some of us decided . and went to find some other games
It hasn't been in the news (GJ deliberations are secret) -- but it will trump Congressional ethics charges -- of which Mr. Ensign has also been charged.
Crowing about this will be the same crow you eat soon enough.
(For the record -- I think Waters and Rangel should resign immediately if the charges are proven. I think this for ANY elected official, regardless of party affiliation or ideology. I just get so tired of the hypocrisy of those that don't see it isn't a problem with just a (D) or just a (R) behind it!