Can Liberals Match the GOP's Enthusiasm?
LAS VEGAS -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had something of an admission for liberals this weekend: "I know there are times, I'm told, that I get on your nerves," he said at the Netroots Nation conference. "I'm here to tell you, you get on my nerves."
He added, "Let's all understand this country would be in a lot more trouble if we weren't around."
The Netroots Nation conference, now in its fifth year, attracted more liberal bloggers and activists than ever before this year, even as polls show Democratic voters are less enthusiastic about voting this year compared to Republicans. Yet the movement that gained its footing opposing the Bush administration and a Republican Congress is now coming to grips with the disappointment many have with the Obama administration and the current Democratic Congress.
This past weekend's conference felt less like a call to action from the left than a therapy session in which the liberal netroots acknowledged that, for now, the Democratic establishment is still their best hope for change in Washington.
Reid Makes a Promise to Dan Choi for Gay Rights
Pelosi Opposed to Raising Retirement Age
Al Franken to Liberals: Don't Check Out Now
But they say the party needs to address systemic government flaws like the filibuster if they want to prove they're serious about overcoming Republican obstructionism. Furthermore, the base says, Democrats can work on closing that enthusiasm gap by supporting candidates and proposals that adhere to their values by showing the party cares more about citizens than corporate interests.
What's Their Problem with Democrats?
Even as Reid told the Netroots audience that this Congress has been the most productive in American history, he acknowledged that its accomplishments have in some ways let liberals down. Even President Obama's signature health care reform package disappointed the left because it left out measures like a "public option," as well as prescription drug reimportation. Many progressive bloggers accused Democrats of capitulating to corporate interests on those points.
AP
Health care reform was just one issue to surface since the start of the Obama presidency that has given liberals the impression Democrats have yet to change the outsized influence special interests have in Washington. Some events, like the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, were out of the Democrats' hands.
"Citizens United was a watershed moment for people because it just solidified what people believed was happening," said Ilyse Hogue, a spokesperson with the liberal grassroots group MoveOn.org.
And while this Democratic Congress and administration were not responsible for the blow out that started the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, many say the party has failed to hold BP's feet to the fire in wake of the accident.
"Voters are incredibly frustrated with the fact that they can't seem to get a fair shake but corporations can," Hogue said.
The resentment many voters feel toward Washington leaves Democrats in a bind heading into the 2010 midterms, since they are the party in power. Democrats have so far painted the elections as a choice between continuing on a path forward set by Democrats or going back to the Bush era.
But if Democrats really want to win back voters' trust, the left says they must run not just against Republicans, but also against the filibuster, which enables minority-party obstructionism. They must also, activists say, put leaders in power that rein in special interests.
Interactive Map: CBS News Election 2010 Race Ratings
Any Democrats or the Right Democrats?
For many liberals, it won't matter if Democrats lose seats this November. Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas, an organizer of the Netroots conference, said on the event's opening night that even with the Senate's 59 Democrats, "We don't have a genuine progressive majority."
Liberals point to Democrats like Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska or Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas (whom the left tried to kick out in a primary) who have in some cases sided with Republicans on critical policy issues.
But at the same time, the left is embracing other Democrats, who they say can win and represent the people well.
CBS
"A lot of folks like an underdog," Marshall said. "I didn't have the support of some people out of this state that is sometimes influential to other people."
A recent Democratic internal poll shows Marshall slightly ahead of Burr, who has led in other polls.
Marshall said voters are generally listless right now because they "really think Washington is not listening to them," or considering their economic hardship.
Political gamesmanship that short changes voters has angered people, she said, such as the horse trading that happened during the health care debate.
"People were very, very angry as certain states got tremendous concessions that people just resented," Marshall said. "Some of it becomes very, very blatant, and American folks are pretty much fed up with that kind of stuff."
While some elected Democrats may be more favorable to liberal voters than others, so are some appointed regulatory officials. The left is zealously fighting for the nomination of Elizabeth Warren to head the new consumer protection bureau established in the recently-passed financial reform bill.
Warren, a Harvard professor who helped shape the plan for the new agency, has "broad trust among the American people," MoveOn.org's Hogue said, because she has "always spoken out loud and proud" on behalf of regular Americans.
At Netroots, where Warren was a featured speaker, she seemed to generate more enthusiasm than many politicians on the November ballot.
Pelosi: Obama was Happier about Health Care than Getting Elected
Governors' Races are 2010's Main Event, Strategists Say
In 2010, Will Democrats Offer More Than Anti-Tea Party?
Busting the Filibuster
Just as the left is eagerly advocating on behalf of Warren, the liberal base is also feverishly pushing for the end of the filibuster.
Netroots attendees pressed Reid about whether he would support a measure to scale back the procedural rule, which allows a single senator to indefinitely uphold a debate unless there are 60 senators who want to stop him. Reid gave an answer that suggested he supported reform without actually committing to anything.
Democratic Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico, however, plans to see where his colleagues really stand on the issue, on the first day of the new Congress next year.
"I challenge my fellow senators to join me and fix the rules on the first day," he said at Netroots. "The Senate's inability to act ... is unacceptable and unsustainable."
Udall said that the Senate has accomplished historic achievements this year. Nevertheless, he said, "with Republicans forcing 60 votes on every single major bill, not enough is getting done. Democrats pay the price for the Republican obstruction because we can't tackle the major issues facing our country."
The technical legal tactic has fired up activists. The nonpartisan group Common Cause launched a petition against the filibuster after it was used to hold up an extension of unemployment benefits. Additionally, one activist from Common Cause said at Netroots that the group is planning to challenge the filibuster in federal court.
More Hotsheet Coverage from Las Vegas:
Labor Leader: GOP Has Declared War on Latinos
Brian Schweitzer: Sometimes Lucky is Better than Good
Are Liberals Too Concerned with Being "Colorblind?"
Conservatives to GOP: Don't Support Any Energy Bill
Sharron Angle: Nevadans Are Telling Harry Reid to "Stop Doing More"
All Hotsheet Coverage from Netroots Nation
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 151 Comments
- IRS scandal highlights leadership vacancies
- Obama: "Full focus" is on recovery from Oklahoma tornado
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1119 Comments
- Former IRS chief: "I can't say" what led to IRS targeting
- Letter to a young scandalmonger
Are they both asamed of their allegiance, not getting elected?
The federal government has mismanaged Social Security and Medicare, to the point of both programs going bankrupt. The arrogant and irresponsible jerks in Washington are creating a record breaking deficit of $1.47 trillion for this year; and they have pushed the national debt to more than $13 trillion. It is staggering.
This is gross mismanagement that has never been seen in corporate America! And these misfits have the arrogance to say the want to reform Wall Street????!!!!!!
November 2010: SEND THESE PEOPLE HOME!!!!
November 2012: SEND THESE PEOPLE HOME!!!!
They have rightfully earned the disfavor of American citizens.
THEY DO NOT DESERVE THE PRIVILEGE TO BE IN LEADERSHIP IN THIS NATION!
THROW THEM OUT OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THEY COMPLETELY DESTROY THIS ONCE GREAT NATION!!!!!!!
Elect responsible adults who will make the hard decisions, and who will reduce the federal government to a manageable size.
-------
Not likely.
Many liberals have been disappointed with the Senate and Obama, not to mention most liberals don't fall for factually-incorrect emotional buzz words like "death panels", "socialism", and "birther"
so when you tax the rich to death, where are these jobs going to come from? the government? more change that our country can't afford. November is coming...
Healthcare? That's our #1 priority?
That's a 4 year failure to address what needs fixing. Bye.
I left this conference feeling as if every speaker and session was a call to action to not give up, despite the GOP obstructionism in the Senate.
In fact, I came home and called my Senators demanding they change the filibuster rule and sent an email to my friends asking them to do the same.
Come on Suzie enlighten us what was the deficit when Obama took office?
Wasn't it like 10.8 trillion that means bush raised it roughly 5 trillion in 8 years? That is bad and should not have happened.
But lets talk Obama now it was 10.8 when he took office, they just recently voted to raise the debt ceiling to 14 trillion. That is 3.2 trillion in 18 months. I think the liberal spend policies are a lot worse then even fake conservative of Bush.
The annual deficit was $1.3 TRILLION when Obama was sworn in.
Deficit spending like the Bush tax cuts, the Medicare Part D overhaul, and the Iraq war ALL added to the national debt when they were created, and CONTINUE to add to the debt today.
For example, over the next 10 years the Bush tax cuts are going to add AN ADDITIONAL $1.5 TRILLION to the national debt, and you're counting that money as "Obama and the democrats out of control spending"?
You might want to look at all of this alleged "spending" that you're attributing to the democrats, because they aren't spending ANYTHING compared to what the republicans have already committed us to!!