July 21, 2010 12:02 PM

Obama Signs Sweeping Financial Reform Into Law

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Economy

Updated 12:39 p.m. Eastern Time

President Obama today signed into law the most sweeping financial industry reform legislation since the Great Depression, hailing the reforms as establishing "the strongest consumer financial protections in history."

"These protections will be enforced by a new consumer watchdog with just one job: looking out for people - not big banks, not lenders, not investment houses - looking out for people as they interact with the financial system," said the president.

Mr. Obama vowed that because of the law, "the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes. There will be no more taxpayer-funded bailouts. Period."

In 2008, the financial industry meltdown nearly dragged down the American economy. The president said today that in the future, "if a large financial institution should ever fail, this reform gives us the ability to wind it down without endangering the broader economy."

In addition to creating a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and empowering the government to break apart large financial institutions that threaten the economy, the legislation, called the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, reins in banks' ability to trade in risky financial instruments.

It also regulates credit and debit card fees - limiting banks' ability to charge retailers high fees to process credit and debit transactions - mandates that lenders verify that borrowers can repay loans, regulates rate hikes and overdraft fees applied to consumers, and mandates clarification of college loan obligations and the risks of investment products.

IN DEPTH: Financial Reform Law Highlights

Mr. Obama said the bill was a response to a recession caused primarily by a breakdown in the financial system. That breakdown, he said, was attributable in part to "unscrupulous lenders," firms like AIG that placed "massive, risky bets with borrowed money," and rules that "left abuse and excess unchecked" while leaving "taxpayers on the hook if a big bank or financial institution ever failed."

To pass the bill, the president said, "we had to overcome the furious lobbying of an array of powerful interest groups, and a partisan minority determined to block change." He hailed the array of lawmakers who joined him at the signing for getting the bill finished, particularly Rep. Barney Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd, who led efforts to craft the legislation and who received rapturous applause from their work. He also thanked the three Senate Republicans and House Republicans who broke ranks to back the bill.

The bill passed over objections from Republicans who complained that it did not address the root problems that caused the meltdown.

In a statement following the signing, House Republican leader John Boehner said the bill "provides permanent bailouts for his Wall Street allies at the expense of community banks and small businesses around the country, while doing nothing to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government mortgage companies that triggered the financial meltdown by giving too many high-risk loans to people who couldn't afford them."

Thomas J. Donohue, president of right-leaning business lobbying group The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, called the law "a financial regulatory boondoggle," arguing that "It won't strengthen our capital markets, it won't jumpstart the economy, and it won't help create any new jobs except in government."

The president sought to reassure Wall Street and financial institutions in his remarks, insisting that the reform will "foster innovation, not hamper it."

White House: Financial Reform Law Won't Hurt Business that Play by the Rules

(Credit: CBS)

"It is designed to make sure that everyone follows the same set of rules, so that firms compete on price and quality, not on tricks and not on traps," he said. "It demands accountability and responsibility from everyone. It provides certainty to everybody from bankers to farmers to business owners to consumers."

"And unless your business model depends on cutting corners or bilking your customers, you've got nothing to fear from this reform," he added.

Also present for the signing at the Ronald Reagan building in Washington were two Americans, Robin Fox and Andrew Giordano, who had faced a credit card interest rate increase and overdraft fees. The president pointed to the impact the legislation would have on people like them in an effort to stress its importance for average Americans.

"With this law, unfair rate hikes, like the one that hit Robin, will end for good," he said. "And we'll ensure that people like Andrew aren't unwittingly caught by overdraft fees when they sign up for a checking account."

Financial Reform Bill Passes: What's In It For You?
5 Ways the Financial Reform Law Changes Your Money Habits

Mr. Obama said the bill would rein in risky Wall Street practices and bring transparency to the complex transactions that helped cause the financial crisis. He also noted that it gives shareholders greater say in compensation for CEOs and high-ranking executives.

The president did acknowledge that much of the impact of the bill will ultimately be left to regulators and that companies will still have leeway to act irresponsibly. Many provisions in the legislation won't take effect for a year or more as regulators set out the new rules.

"For these new rules to be effective, regulators will have to be vigilant," he said. "We also may need to make adjustments along the way as our financial system adapts to these new changes and changes around the globe. No law can force anybody to be responsible; it's still incumbent on those on Wall Street to heed the lessons of this crisis in how they conduct their businesses."

Close to 400 people were present for the signing, including business leaders (among them Citi CEO Vikram Pandit), lawmakers and consumer advocates. Also present was Elizabeth Warren, among the top candidates to run the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

Battle Brews in Naming Financial Watchdog Head

The president concluded his remarks by stating that there is "no dividing line between Main Street and Wall Street."

"In the end, our financial system only works - our market is only free - when there are clear rules and basic safeguards that prevent abuse, that check excess, that ensure that it is more profitable to play by the rules than to game the system," he said. "And that's what these reforms are designed to achieve: no more, no less. Because that is how we will ensure that our economy works for consumers, that it works for investors, that it works for financial institutions - that it works for all of us."

Special Section: Wall Street Under Fire

Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by apostasyusa July 24, 2010 12:18 PM EDT
We need to protect Americans from the burdens of greed on society.

We have a government that cares again. Thank you all who made it happen!

Banking reforms.
HealthCare reforms:
Nuclear arms agreements:
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act:
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act:
Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act:
Children's Health Insurance Reauthor-ization Act:
Weapons System Acquisition Reform Act:
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act:
Student loan reform:

The Republican Party has been reduced to a propaganda machine owned by foreigners. If all you care about is making people vote against their own interests, then all you need to do is proliferate falsehoods and confusion. Republicans don't have to stand for anything.

Conservatives lost and the American people won.

Keep on truckin Democrats.
Reply to this comment
by jayrh July 22, 2010 5:53 PM EDT
Another massive bill and it doesn't even mention Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac... When you pass a bill that doesn't even address the main problems it can only be called another power grab!
Reply to this comment
by apostasyusa July 24, 2010 12:17 PM EDT
Fannie and Freddie were just secondary market suckers like so many other banks, who got tricked into buying billions and billions in junk loan bundles. There was a scandal at Freddie and Fannie, an accounting scandal, but that has nothing to do with the mortgage crisis and economic recession.
by GunsInTheSky July 22, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
And similar to No-Child Left Behind which left our education system in tatters.
-----
Is this really the conservative spin these days...that NCLB is the cause of our poor education system in the US?


Ye of short-term memory: This was an issue long befor NCLB, long before the department of education.


Besides gaining imaginary political points, you gain nothing by blaming the federal government for this one.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod July 22, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
by USA_is_back July 21, 2010 1:39 PM EDT
chevy keeps quoting Jefferson the Liberal. Not very bright are you chevy?

your just a sheep, grazing on the scraps the government doles out.

"I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will"


by starving1968-3 July 21, 2010 1:30 PM EDT
Your Jefferson quote is 100% irrelevant to this story, unless you think multi-trillion corporations are "individuals" whose "rights" to plunder and pillage, are more important than the entire economy of the US.

Bin Laden needs more recruits like you.


Maybe we should just get rid of all multi-trillion dollars corporations and then where would we be?

Hey, I know, the government can control everything. That will work.

Sounds like Hugo Chaves and Bin Laden are more up your ally.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod July 22, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
by GunsInTheSky July 21, 2010 2:50 PM EDT
by chevyhotrod July 21, 2010 2:24 PM EDT
Why should the good banks pay for the bad banks? Or do you think all banks are bad?

------

Maybe you should look up "FDIC", if you think this concept is so puzzling.


FDIC provides deposit insurance, it does not provide monies to the failed banks owners/shareholders, it is insurance for the consumers, not the banks.

The FDIC also examines and supervises certain financial institutions for safety and soundness, performs certain consumer-protection functions, and manages banks in receiverships (failed banks).

Maybe you should look it up?

If you run a business and are good at what you do, should you pay to have your competitors bailed out every time they make bad choices?

I don't think so.
Reply to this comment
by bc-1948 July 22, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
For any of you right wingers - I suggest you read President Bush's remarks at the signing of his American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003. His goal was to "add 5.5 million new minority homeowners in America by 2010. In the 18 months prior to this act, already an addtional 1 million + minority families became homeowners. How with this accomplished? - With the ZERO down loan programs President Bush pushed.

Now, to be fair, there could be an argument made that this was a way to keep the country from failing into a recession after 9/11/01 - but get a chart by year of homeownership and see when the increases really took place. It was during President Bush's 2 terms. Quote: "Today, we received a report that showed that new home construction last month reached its highest level in mearly 20 years."

Hmm... how was that accomplished? - zero down, stated income loans (no verification of income), mortgage brokers getting loans for unqualifed people - Wall Street bundling these and selling them to retirement plans and banks around the world. Everyone was making commissions - who cared if they were going to be bad loans.
Reply to this comment
by juryrocket July 21, 2010 11:05 PM EDT
Look like the innocent flower of reform, yet beneath we find the serpent of Democratic social agenda, redistribution, and expansionary federal control over the private sector. This financial deform, like all of Obama's bills, are a tragic travesty eating away at the American ideals of freedom, opportunity, and individualism. Here's a good satire:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvabFm-cE9c
Reply to this comment
by thanksgreed July 21, 2010 7:34 PM EDT
Sweeping financial reform? Oh please, how stupid do they think we are?
Reply to this comment
by bc-1948 July 21, 2010 7:39 PM EDT
It's at least a step in the right direction- compared to anything the Republicans offered. I would have been happy if it had banned all derivative trading and made hedge fund investors transparent.
by thanksgreed July 21, 2010 8:11 PM EDT
Well,you're right there. I spend one whole day asking the bi*#hing GOPers for a suggestion....ANY suggestion. Guess how many I got...one, that was opposed by the GOP governors. GEEEEEEZZZZZEEEE
by pensacola8-2009 July 21, 2010 6:38 PM EDT
Financial Reform was the right thing to do. Any president serving this term would have been expected to do it to some extent.

President Obama has done the sensible thing and should receive credit for having the courage to push it through a highly sensationalized political machine.

Could anyone just imagine what would have happened if President Bush and the Republicans were permitted to put the Social Security system on the stock market?
Reply to this comment
by Mom-O-Truth July 21, 2010 5:26 PM EDT
Would this stop the GREED ? No, they'll find another loop whole in 2012.
Bad news for Dick might get another heart attack.
Reply to this comment
See all 58 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook