Lawmaker Warns "Don't Ask" Repeal Means Talking to Kids About Homosexuality
CBS
Conservative Missouri Democrat Rep. Ike Shelton, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said today that the military should keep the "don't ask, don't tell" policy intact in part to avoid parents having to talk to their children about homosexuality.
Congress has moved toward authorizing repeal of the Clinton-era policy, which bans gays from serving openly in the military. The House voted to overturn the law last month.
If a repeal provision gets through the Senate - a fierce fight is expected in the coming months - repeal could go into effect after the conclusion of a Pentagon study ending December 1st and subsequent approval from President Obama and military brass.
According to the Associated Press, Skelton told reporters that repeal of the policy could put families in a difficult position because it could prompt children to ask about homosexuality.
"What do mommies and daddies say to their 7-year-old child?" he asked.
Skelton, one of the 26 Democrats who opposed repeal in the House, added that his "biggest concern are the families."
Popular in Politics
- Michelle Obama decries "slander" that educated blacks are "trying to act white" Play Video
- Both parties vow to "get to the bottom" of IRS scandal 264 Comments
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 147 Comments
- Benghazi-disciplined diplomat a prolific poet
- Romney condemns "breach of trust" in Washington 250 Comments
- Republicans continue beating Benghazi drum 418 Comments
- Adviser on White House scandals: "Partisan fishing expeditions" won't distract Obama 207 Comments
- Immigration bill would require fingerprinting at 30 airports














The repeal of DADT is NOT, that is NOT the same thing as letting gays serve openly in the military.
Before DADT it was DO ASK MUST TELL
Are gay? Not allowed to serve
Lie about being gay, serve prison time as it's a crime
DADT meant if you kept it secret you could serve.
This was enacted because nutjobs thinking gays in the military would lead to the downfall of civilization would not allow for the passage of a bill allowing gays to serve - a compromise was reached, it's called DADT and was and is the biggest preservation of any rights gays have in the military.
I am all for gays doing whatever they want (as long as say it's legal for the rest of us....)
Marriage, serving in the military, spousal rights, etc....
In order for this to mean what people are stating it means (gays allowed in the military)
There MUST be a law passed allowing for gays to serve openly in the military THEN repeal DADT as a side issue.
This legislation is NOT for allowing gays to serve openly
It is only repealing a specific set of you can do this but not that and if you get caught you can suffer consequences. If you can be secretive and not be found out through actionable displays/associations/outright statements/etc - then your rights to serve are protected.
BEFORE DADT and IF IT IS REPEALED THE THEN AND STILL CURRENT LAWS MEANS IT IS ILLEGAL TO BE GAY IN THE US MILITARY
IT'S FORBIDDEN
WAKE UP
When Gay rights activists and gays in the military support a repeal to a bill that is the only current thing allowing them to serve - it's a sad day.
I guess Shelton lives in a different world.
one who actually has a brain.
He left the closet when he was in middle school, long before it became acceptable. Due in large part to his activism, my son's high school formed a diversity club the year after he graduated.
Years later, my son is an extremely happy, well adjusted and successful young man. I couldn't be more proud of him!
sttt,, sttttt, stupe,
Just plain dumb.
GAYS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SERVE IN THE UNITED STATES MILITARY
DADT _ALLOWS_ People who may be gay (see: are gay) to serve in the military as long they aren't discovered by displays, statements (like saying I'm here, I'm queer.... to your commanding officer) or associations.
DADT is the only thing currently protecting your service.
The legislation is being incorrectly touted as allowing gays to serve THIS IS NOT THE CASE