Political Hotsheet
By

Marc Ambinder /

CBS News/ May 18, 2010, 11:30 PM

The Surprises From Tuesday's Primaries

President Barack Obama pauses as he listens to a questions from Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., while attending the Senate Democratic Policy Committee Issues Conference, Wednesday, Feb. 3,2010, at the Newseum in Washington.

/ AP

We pundits like to pretend that we've got all of the potential outcomes of an election. That way, we're able to say, "Well yes, Katie, in fact, here is why THAT happened." But we get surprised, too. Here's what surprised me about Tuesday's elections:

1. Democratic turnout in Kentucky. For a party that is supposed to be unenthusiastic and depressed, for a race where all the news coverage focused on the brand name Republicans running, turnout for the Democratic Senate race surpassed 2006 levels -- and that was a year when Democrats were quite enthusiastic. This is an auspicious sign for Democrats in the Bluegrass State. Don't know why turnout was as high as it was ... unless our assumptions about the mood of the Democratic electorate are mistaken.

2. Rand Paul = Tea Party. I was surprised by how openly and wantonly Rand Paul embraced the Tea Party movement and credited it for his victory. Surprised because I don't think the Tea Party actually deserves too much credit. It will turn out that most of Paul's voters were traditional conservative base voters who found in Paul an eclectic, authentic economically libertarian candidate who spoke truth to power.

Rand Paul to Dems: Please Bring Obama to Kentucky
Paul: Tea Party Ready to "Flex Some Muscle"

3. Why CNN didn't cover the election during its 9-10pm hour. Not to knock on another network, but on a night when the big story really is politics -- the biggest night of politics until November, the "Biggest Name In News" featured Larry King interviewing Mick Jagger (and a Mick Jagger impersonator). Confusing for viewers who didn't want MSNBC or Fox News spin.

4. I was surprised that the White House didn't let Joe Biden or Barack Obama campaign for Arlen Specter. It might have helped push Specter over the line. And the president, who spent time in Ohio today, clearly had the time to make a pit stop. The reasons why the White House decided not to over-exert their influence at the last minute is confusing. Obama already cut television commercials for Specter, so what would the harm in having Mr. Obama come and campaign for him?

Yes, there's the argument that Mr. Obama hasn't campaigned for any winners since he came into office, but surely that's a product of the political environment and not Mr. Obama. The White House sent mixed messages about Specter, and that may have hurt him in the end. One answer is that maybe Arlen Specter didn't want help in the end; indeed, Biden offered to campaign for Specter on Friday, just three days after his 41-year-old son had suffered a stroke. Specter asked Biden to do radio ads and interviews instead, which Biden dutifully did. This confusion gets at the heart of Specter's problem: he was a man without a solid identity in a year when voters want purity and authenticity.

Joe Sestak: "I Stood Up to My Party"
House Republicans: "We've Got a Lot of Work To Do"

5. Organized labor spent a lot of money to...send a message. As much as $7 million, by some estimates. This was in Arkansas, where it was Blanche Lincoln's opposition to a bill that would have made it easier for unions to organize that prompted the AFL-CIO to find a candidate to challenge her in the primary. Lincoln's opposition to a health care "public option" was the final straw. Even if Lincoln wins the run-off, the Democrat will almost certainly lose the seat to a Republican in the fall. That's a lot of money to send the message to Democrats that they'd better not to take labor for granted.

6. Finally, I was surprised by the outcome in the 12th congressional district of Pennsylvania district. I know a Democrat, Jack Murtha, held the seat since the Ordovician era, but the demography of the district is basically Republican, and both sides had evenly matched field campaigns. But in this environment, the Republican should have won by at least five points.

I was surprised that the effort by the Republican, Tim Burns, to nationalize the race, making it a referendum on President Obama, spending, bailouts and health care, appeared not to work. It's time to think about revising some basic assumptions about the fall elections. It's certainly not a good time to be a Democrat, but there may be a lot more inter-race variability that prognosticators are assuming.

Results:

Roundup: All Winners and Losers
Specter Falls in Pa. Dem Primary to Joe Sestak
Rand Paul Wins Kentucky GOP Primary
Blanche Lincoln, Bill Halter Headed for Run-Off
Dem Wins Special Election for Murtha's Seat

More Analysis:

Specter's Loss Goes Beyond Anti-Incumbent Mood
Where do Tuesday's Winners Go from Here?
Who Had the Better Spin?


The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder is CBS News' chief political consultant. You can read more of his posts in Hotsheet here. You can also follow him on Twitter.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
9 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
goszampolit says:
My impression is the opposite of the vehement early posters. Typically news is biased towards what used to be moderate Republicans-pro-business upper middle class whites with sympathy for downtrodden ethnics and lower class whites but an affinity for Horatio Alger hogwash and trend of the moment reporting with frequent lapses into press release rewording as reporting.
The conventional wisdom is what the people who pay for it desire it to be. The Dems have tacked right while talking left and are getting hit for it, while the GOP has gone bonkers word salad crazy to the right with a smattering of Austrian and Ayn Rand fantasism. They don't seem to know whether to sit, cry, or go blind right now. Obama has talked left but run right on every issue including torture and murder by toy plane. The wing dings should be happier than they are, but that would be a rational assumption, and rational doesn't play over there.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimbom121 says:
#4. Why are you surprised? The White House has traditionally NOT campaigned in primary elections. I think privately they wanted Sestak to win because he will be a better general campaign candidate.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lucilioness says:
NOBODY LIKES A TRAITOR. THE ONLY REASON ARLEN LEFT THE GOP WAS TO TRY AND SAVE HIS JOB. PERIOD! HE GAMBLED, AND HE LOST. PERIOD!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
larry0304 says:
What a HORRIBLE job of reporting the facts. Ambinder should be FIRED!. He failed to mention Critz ran as a conservative! He is for the 2nd amendment, against cap and trade and stated he would have voted against health care. He distanced himself as far away from Obama as he could.
reply
jimbom121 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Doesn't matter...you missed the point. This is a conservative district, in a year when conventional wisdom says anyone with a D next to ther name is going to get defeated. Maybe convesntional wisdom is wrong this year.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
weewillywonka says:
Maybe the politicians and the pundits should listen to the anger of the electorate. We're sick of the do-nothing congress - be they Republican or Democrat. Sick of the party of NO that keeps anything from getting done - sick of the incumbents who think no further than their campaign donors - and sick of the infighting between and within the parties. We have serious problems and NOTHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT IT. The President of the United States has term-limits - the congress needs the same.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Harden_Tar says:
Whoever wrote this left leaning piece of propoganda needs to check his facts. Sending Obama to help Specter would have been the kiss of death. We all know that. Biden has no political and wouldn't have mattered other than to raise the question why the POTUS did not come personally if it was that importants. The only thing I do agree on is the unions finding someone else to corrupt in Arkansas. They see the handwriting on the wall come November and realize they need to start writing checks and sending coke and hookers to the ones they own.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TVO1CITW says:
Obama is still working under the table on something. Never think this mad man is going to give up. I will hold out on laughing until after the November election and again after the 2012 election.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
liberals_worst_nightmare says:
Poor Barry. All I can say is Hope for Change.
reply