Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ May 6, 2010, 11:44 AM

National Day of Prayer Takes Place Despite Court Ruling

AP

Today marks the federally-recognized National Day of Prayer, an annual tradition that dates back to 1952.

Will it be the last?

Last month, a U.S. District Judge in Wisconsin ruled that the government-sanctioned event, established by Congress and marked with a proclamation from the president, is unconstitutional.

"It goes beyond mere 'acknowledgment' of religion because its sole purpose is to encourage all citizens to engage in prayer, an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function in this context," wrote Judge Barbara Crabb, who said the event violates the First Amendment's establishment clause banning the creation of a "law respecting an establishment of religion" in the Constitution.

Crabb's decision resulted from a lawsuit filed by a group of atheists and agnostics called the Freedom From Religion Foundation, who complained that the government did not have the right to tell them to pray.

But it did not stop the Obama administration from issuing a National Day of Prayer proclamation this year, just as it had last year; in it, President Obama calls on citizens to "pray, or otherwise give thanks."

"Throughout our history, whether in times of great joy and thanksgiving, or in times of great challenge and uncertainty, Americans have turned to prayer," said Mr. Obama. "In prayer, we have expressed gratitude and humility, sought guidance and forgiveness, and received inspiration and assistance, both in good times and in bad."

The ruling declaring the day unconstitutional sparked outrage from lawmakers, who said it went against America's religious tradition and urged the Obama Justice Department to appeal. Said House Judiciary Committee ranking Republican Lamar Smith: "What's next? Declaring the federal holiday for Christmas unconstitutional?"

The Justice Department did decide to appeal, and Crabb said it was fine for the National Day of Prayer to go forward until appeals are exhausted, which is why it is being recognized today despite the ruling.

Opponents of the day say they do not object to private days of prayer - and, indeed, thousands of private events are taking place nationwide today - but they say the government should not be involved; the Obama administration counters that it simply acknowledges the role of religion in American life.

Upon word that the Obama administration was appealing, Freedom From Religion Foundation co-president Annie Laurie Gaylor expressed her disappointment, saying of the president, a former Constitutional law professor, "I would have expected something better from a legal scholar."

Unlike former President George W. Bush, Mr. Obama has not held services in conjunction with the National Day of Prayer, though he has participated in a number of prayer breakfasts while in office; the decision to put less of a focus on the day prompted a false Internet-driven rumor that he had "canceled" the event because he prefers to pray with Muslims. (Snopes debunks the rumor here.)

The White House said the president, who has not been a regular churchgoer in office, is praying privately instead of holding an ecumenical service, as Mr. Bush did.

"Prayer is something that the president does every day," press secretary Robert Gibbs said. He added that "the president understands, in his own life and in his family's life, the role that prayer plays."

That's insufficient for the conservative National Day of Prayer Task Force, which works to "publicize and preserve America's Christian heritage" and has expressed frustration there is no service, as the Christian Science Monitor reports. For his part, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh complained that the White House's position marked the president "asserting his authoritarian control."

Also unhappy is 2010 National Day of Prayer Task Force honorary chairman Franklin Graham, who was disinvited from a Pentagon National Day of Prayer service over his comments that Muslims are "enslaved" by Islam, which he had called "a very evil and wicked religion." Graham is reportedly standing outside the Pentagon in protest of the disinvitation today.

Atheist groups, meanwhile, are torn: While they are happy Mr. Obama has elected not to hold services in conjunction with the day, they are frustrated that he is continuing the tradition and that he is appealing Judge Crabb's ruling.

"We are very happy he did away with the George W. Bush-era celebrations and party, but we wish he wouldn't do it at all...When church and state are separate, separate is separate," American Atheists spokesperson David Silverman told CNN.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
194 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MommaBills says:
Wow, the propaganda has won. Everyone actually thinks there is such a thing as "seperation of church and state". This does not exist, I have thoroughly researched this and all it is was some language found in a letter from Jefferson. No where will you find this in the constitution. Our founding fathers were all Christians and wanted religion to be a part of our heritage and lives as it was in theirs. This country was purely started from the desire to have "freedom of religion" no state sanction church but churches founded by the people based on their own beliefs. According to this poll, 89% of this country has bought in to this lie. It is a very sad time for this country.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
shimmerspring says:
well, they have already made it illegal to pray or read your bible while in a state building. but i really don't care! NO ONE is going to tell me where i can and cannot seek guidance from my father! no one! 2 words folks. peaceful protest. no matter what stupid laws they pass. if i need to pray or open up that book and read for any reason. i am going to do it. i totally agree with separation of church and state. that also means that as long as i am not hurting anyone physically, ( offense does not count as being physical ) the law has no right to say anything to me. i still have GOD given free will. and if i am sitting in the waiting area silently reading or bowing my head with my eyes closed, not making a sound, they are not going to make me stop. even if they throw me in jail. i have freedom of thought and will and i will not respect any laws saying otherwise. i never hurt anyone. i never even talk about God unless the subject comes up. then i do not bother arguing with anyone. everyone has a reason why the think and feel the way they do. i will not try to control anyone else. i expect the same in return.
reply
Tcat7 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Agree with shimmersprings post. Also note I do not agree the poll above is stated fairly. As is would go against 1 of America's established religious tradition's, and as I understand it was extablished for all faiths.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jhggins says:
"pray, or otherwise give thanks." ???

What if some governor issued a National Caucasian Day, where Americans are encouraged to "Celebrate the joy of being white, or otherwise a minority."

Would that be Okay?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ge556 says:
bjoh249 speaks of the Good Old Days.
Yeah, if you were a white man, or if you stayed in your place otherwise.
Black men got lynched if someone thought they looked at a white woman.
Women had to stay in their place.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bjoh249 says:
Atheists like to claim that the days of religious rule were dark. Well, how about the communist countries who have shut down churches and have tried to ban people from practing religion and have imprisoned and killed people who do, like clergy and people caught worshipping. Actually things were better when we were more religious, people were more moral, there wasn't shootings in schools all of the time, less crime, nicer people. It wasn't a utopia, and there were still some bad people, but it was nothing like today.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bjoh249 says:
I agree with Obama in continuing the tradition. The government is just recognising faith, which is a part of the American tradition. Atheists have been loud, rude, disrespectful and everything else in the book for too long. If they don't want to believe in God then I agree that the government shouldn't force them to believe, but the government is not doing that, the NDOP is OPTIONAL. Atheists are just angry people who wants religious freedom wiped out of every area of the country. I am also sick of their claim that they are smarter than everyone else. Most atheists have no more of an education than christians, and there are also christians who have more education than some atheists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jankebenzone says:
by blarghncharge May 8, 2010 8:44 AM EDT
you can send your 'miracle' details to anybody tasked with figuring such things out...such as the scientific arena relevant to the subject. not random individual people, you ****. I'm not a scientist and of course i'm not going to post my details for everyone to see and invite who-knows-what to my doorstep. get a life. Nobody should be ever expected to believe your pile of dung until you can prove it to be the case. you could cite a scientific paper on the matter, but you haven't bothered with that, so don't bother yapping about your 'miracles' until you do. don't be surprised that said miracles could never be proven to exist either. you think it's that easy to make people 'believe' and make your claims gain truth? really, grow up.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just as I thought, all mouth and no action! you're as phoney as all the other atheists, Faced with the prospect of having to face the truth, they chicken out to save their sorry behinds.
As they say, put up or shut up!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tensai13 says:
Thank god for Judge Barbara Crab. The religiously deluded mass of humanity still mistakenly believe "God is truth". But there are many "gods" and so there must be many "truths" which is of course nonsense and leads inevitably to violent conflict. The wise understand the reality, that "Truth is god" and that there is only the one truth upon which the entire universe operates - and the fact that there exists no "god" is an obvious part of this truth.
reply
anotherview2-2009 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
There is no definition that I can find that defines "God is truth". With all the various religions and religious practices the "truth" would seem to be that there is a recognition that there exists something that operates in our lives that is unexplainable, except through what some say are the mythologies of religion. Crab is missing the point of National Prayer Day. It is not a law or mandate to pray, however you might do that. Rather it is a day in which a nation can take a moment to pause, and find that place where peace resides; to be grateful and appreciative that in this great country we are blessed in so many ways.

Each of us believe in something that is important and meaningful in our lives. Perhaps that is the 'god' each can take a moment to say thanks to on our National Prayer Day if you have no other source of inspiration, support, and inner strength, and guidance.
grimm39 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes there is a God. And everything is coming to pass.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jankebenzone says:
by Scimajor May 8, 2010 12:26 AM EDT
How revolting that he would so callously dismiss a court ruling particularly on something that is so clearly unconstitutional.

Push your religion on someone else please Mr. President.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don,t get all contorted out of shape, Obama is about as christian as a child abusing catholic priest. Have you seen the picture of the Obama's and the Clinton's together in a church signing hymns. Hilarious, about as phoney as a three dollar bill,esp the Clintons.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jankebenzone says:
by blarghncharge May 8, 2010 12:36 AM EDT
proof or it didn't happen. you can make up stuff all you want, but until it starts to get recorded in some sense,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, on one condition, when you get the proof, you post your real name and address on this site, you post you were proven wrong and apoligize for being an atheist. Of course you,ll have to sign an surety to make sure you comply with your end and not back out like so many others do . Where do I send the accident and the medical reports?
reply
blarghncharge replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
you can send your 'miracle' details to anybody tasked with figuring such things out...such as the scientific arena relevant to the subject. not random individual people, you ****. I'm not a scientist and of course i'm not going to post my details for everyone to see and invite who-knows-what to my doorstep. get a life. Nobody should be ever expected to believe your pile of dung until you can prove it to be the case. you could cite a scientific paper on the matter, but you haven't bothered with that, so don't bother yapping about your 'miracles' until you do. don't be surprised that said miracles could never be proven to exist either. you think it's that easy to make people 'believe' and make your claims gain truth? really, grow up.
See all 194 Comments