Political Hotsheet
By

Brian Montopoli /

CBS News/ May 4, 2010, 3:02 PM

Oil Spill Sparks New Debate: To Drill or Not to Drill?

AP

In the wake of the environmental disaster caused by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, more lawmakers are starting to state for the record where they now stand on the issue of offshore drilling.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday became the first high-profile Republican to reverse course on the issue, saying the $100 million his cash-strapped state might gain from expanding oil drilling off the coast of Santa Barbara County isn't worth the risk of environmental catastrophe.

"You turn on the television and see this enormous disaster, you say to yourself, 'Why would we want to take on that kind of risk?"' he said.

Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry, meanwhile, raised eyebrows when he suggested Monday the spill was an "act of God."

"From time to time, there are going to be things that occur that are acts of God that cannot be prevented," he said. "So until we know that, to make a judgment on this administration or any further activity may be a bit premature."

He added that he hopes "we don't see a knee-jerk reaction across this country that says we're going to shut down drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, because the cost to this country will be staggering."

Perry's staff later said the governor was not suggesting God caused the spill but rather that it was too early to assign blame to oil company BP, according to the Dallas Morning News. The governor later pointed to "mechanical failure" as the likely culprit.

Perry's comments somewhat echo those of Sarah Palin, who last week reaffirmed her support for drilling with a statement that she continues "to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous, and peaceful nation." She later said she wants "our country to be able to trust the oil industry."

The two Republicans are trying to counteract a push from the left to move away from offshore drilling in the wake of the disaster. Liberal group MoveOn.org yesterday released an ad calling on the Obama administration to reinstate the ban on new offshore drilling.

The debate over drilling is particularly active in Virginia, where Republican Gov. Robert F. McDonnell continues to push aggressively for oil and gas drilling off the coast. President Obama ended the ban on drilling off the state's coast in March.

McDonnell "flew to Houston on Monday to tout the benefits of offshore drilling at an industry-sponsored conference," the Washington Post reports. "He told reporters before he left that he does not want to postpone drilling but to learn from the accident off Louisiana's coast."

Yet the state's two Democratic senators, who have supported drilling, are now calling for delays to ensure safety in the wake of the accident. So is the Republican mayor of Virginia Beach, Will Sessions, who had also backed drilling.

"It's alarming to me,'' Sessions said of the accident, according to the Post. "It gives me great concern."

Likely 2012 GOP presidential candidate and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, meanwhile, offered some surprise praise for the Obama administration's handling of the crisis, telling ABC News that he thinks the government "is responding to the best of their abilities."

He added, however, that he didn't think it's "realistic or wise" to end the practice of offshore drilling.

"Almost 40 years have passed with an incident like that," he said. "I think there's certainly going to be lessons learned as a result of this tragedy, but I hope that they go to the issue of improving safeguards and improving technology and improving oversight, not trying to shut down drilling."

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
5 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bhappy2-2 says:
by retm-w May 4, 2010 6:48 PM EDT If the government agencies that regulate and are supposed to police, these activities would do their jobs, maybe we wouldn't have all these problems

The same can be said for ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS. But, when a state tries to remedy THAT situation, they are depicted as being racists. Even American Citizens have been denied their right to display OUR flag because 'it might upset ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS' and cause them to riot. Yet, these same ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS are allowed to celebrate their racist holiday, display their racist flag and even have a school-supported racist club to further their racist cause. The ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS do this because la raza tells them to. They tell the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS to protest against everything American and to do everything they can to bankrupt America so they can successfully turn America into a communist country and the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS can take over. It's time to rid America of ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS and EVERYONE who supports them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
retm-w says:
If the government agencies that regulate and are supposed to police, these activities would do their jobs, maybe we wouldn't have all these problems. Yhe Europeans don't have these problems with their offshore oil rigs and drilling in the North Sea. Why because they enforce their regulations. A prime example of our government enforcing regulations, how many violations did Massey have and 29 miners lost their lives. Why wasn't that mine shut down until the violations were corrected. What good is it to regulate and not enforce.
reply
pasmalltown replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by retm-w May 4, 2010 6:48 PM EDT -
"Yhe Europeans don't have these problems with their offshore oil rigs and drilling in the North Sea. Why because they enforce their regulations."
-----------------------------
Better enforcement will MINIMIZE spills, but the Europeans cannot claim "zero tolerance" for spills. Your suggestion that "all these problems" will go away thru better enforcement should include "because the Europeans make the guilty parties pay for their mistakes." There will no doubt be spills even with better enforcement. The key is making private industry pay for their mistakes or as some conservatives intially tried to call it, "an Act of God".

The problem with your criticism of the Fed gov't's inability to enforce the laws, is you ignore the fact that the oil industry lobby has some amount of control over what goes into those laws so simple enforcement of the current laws will NOT solve the "all these problems".............
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thebob-bob says:
One last blast of pollution before the oil runs out? Why not. The global warming model predicts rapid increases in extreme weather events (Hello, Nashville). You know, Monster thunderstorms, 100 year floods every couple of years, tornadoes in places that never get tornadoes. Drill it, spill it, burn it and be done with it.

Stop burning fossil fuels.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ffotoragg says:
'we should learn from the accident off louisiana's coast'----so what is left to learn from the exxon valdez 'accident'??????? has all the r&d gone to drilling only and not to capping a blowout??? according to bp's internal documents, a blowout from this well was 'virtually impossible'---WELL HOW ABOUT NOW?????????? and now bp is willing to try 'anything and everything'-so is our southern coastline now the big testing ground? it's no sacrifice for bp, other than money---i say seize all bp's assets and wells inside our borders and let the U.S. take the lead on r&d in this field----
reply