Arizona Immigration Bill Exposes GOP Rift
AP
The controversial immigration bill signed into law in Arizona Friday is exposing a rift in the Republican party over how it addresses issues important to Latinos, a fast-growing voting bloc overwhelmingly opposed to the GOP-backed bill.
Two prominent Florida Republicans - former Governor Jeb Bush and likely GOP Senate nominee Marco Rubio - today spoke out against the legislation.
Bush (pictured with his brother George W. Bush) told Politico that the bill "creates unintended consequences." He added: "It's difficult for me to imagine how you're going to enforce this law. It places a significant burden on local law enforcement and you have civil liberties issues that are significant as well."
Rubio, meanwhile, used similar language, saying "aspects of the law, especially that dealing with 'reasonable suspicion,' are going to put our law enforcement officers in an incredibly difficult position."
"It could also unreasonably single out people who are here legally, including many American citizens," he added.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, meanwhile, suggested the law is unconstitutional, though he said it reflects "what good people will do" when they are left without better options.
Among those defending the bill are Republican lawmakers in Arizona, among them Gov. Jan Brewer and Sen. John McCain, both of whom are facing election battles this year. If Brewer hadn't signed the legislation, she would have exposed herself to criticism from the right that she is soft on immigration.
McCain, for his part, is facing a challenge from the right from former congressman and talk show host J.D. Hayworth. McCain was once a strong backer of comprehensive immigration reform that included a so-called "path to citizenship" for illegal immigrants, a position Hayworth has aggressively criticized.
McCain elected to support the bill signed into law by Brewer. Given the chance to repudiate it on CBS' "The Early Show" Tuesday, McCain declined, instead casting the bill as "a response to the president's and the administration's failure to secure our borders." He added that law enforcement officials believe they can implement the law without racial profiling.
Many Republicans seem unsure how to approach the new law. House Minority Leader John Boehner did not exactly endorse the legislation in comments Tuesday, though he didn't reject it either: He said the state has a right to pass its own laws and that "it has a 70 percent approval in Arizona and I think we ought to respect the people of Arizona and everyone should make their own decisions."
Indeed, the legislation puts members of the GOP in a difficult position: They don't want to turn off those members of their base who want them to take a strong position on illegal immigration, but they also fear the long-term repercussions of alienating Latino voters. In 2007, President George W. Bush's push for comprehensive immigration reform (centered on a "guest-worker program") was rejected by the Senate amid concerns from within the party that the bill amounted to amnesty for illegal immigrants.
The Arizona law, which would go into effect in July, includes in its provisions a requirement for law enforcement officers to question a person about his or her immigration status if there is "reasonable suspicion" that person may be illegally in the country. Attorney General Eric Holder indicated today that he believes "the law is an unfortunate one that will be subject to potential abuse" and said that the Justice Department is "considering a court challenge."
Popular in Politics
- Obama forgets to salute while boarding Marine One Play Video
- Obama prom pictures surface 130 Comments
- IRS' Lerner was asked to resign, refused: GOP Sen. 156 Comments
- Is President Obama ending the war on terror? 284 Comments
- GOP Rep.: Obama elected because of Reagan's immigration reforms
- Now, some unions upset over Obamacare
- IRS official Lois Lerner placed on leave 131 Comments
- Rand Paul uses 2016 bully pulpit to push Obama on drones













People will not be stopped on the street to show anything like an "ausweiss" nor will the LEOs be out looking for someone who looks alien. Since many of the state's LEOs are Hispanic, they would be showing their IDs to themselves or to other officers throughout the day.
The reporting on the law is scandalously erroneous and bad. Much that one reads or hears on this or many other issues and developments on governmental, political, and cultural matters is not true. Like TexFandango, I notice something reminiscent of Nazi Denmark: I feel like a Jew reading Nazi newspapers or hearing the news on the radio. America's mass news media, for the most part, cannot be trusted to be true or fair in their reporting and commentary--or intelligent.
No doubt illegal immigration is a serious problem. And when people are scared they look for scapegoats to deflect any sense of personal responsibility for their plight. I'm sure they are otherwise good and decent folk, but I suspect Arizona's governor and many of its legislators would have felt comfortable living under German rule in 1944.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070h.pdf
CBS and the other liberal media probably should have looked at this before creating mass hysteria.
Democrats supported a bill (now law) that requires American citizens to "show their papers" proving they have health insurance, yet they vilify Arizona for requiring illegal immigrants prove residency. So WE LEGAL CITIZENS have to prove we're obeying the law, but asking those breaking our laws for their documentation makes us "Nazis".
Democrats believe those who buy, wear and make fur coats are killers, but it's perfectly acceptable to them to kill unborn children. They care more about animals than their fellow humans.
Democrats were calling for Bush to be impeached for lying about WMDs in Iraq, some calling him a murderer and hanging him in effigy when all he did was believe his intelligence analysts in making his decision to invade Iraq. But when Obama lies about not raising taxes for families making less than $250,000 a year, lies about making government transparent, then hides behind closed doors and secret deals, it's ok. (Oh, and we KNOW Iraq had WMDs....they used chemical weapons on the Kurds in northern Iraq, killing tens of thousands, so where was the lie?)
Democrats think that those working on Wall Street are crooks and should be punished with fines and prison time.....but want an addition $50 BILLION to bail out those crooks in the future if they need it.
You have to wonder if they're just confused or do they have double standards. Do they really know what they want?
No more anchor babies.
Fine and jail employers using illegal labor.
Massive sweeps to deport, deport, deport.