March 29, 2010 5:17 PM

Craig Becker Appointment Stirs Debate Over Economy, Politics

By
Stephanie Condon
Topics
Economy
economy jobs

President Obama's decision on Saturday to make 15 recess appointments, most notably appointing Craig Becker to the National Labor Relations Board, has sparked a debate about partisan politics as well as the best ways to bolster the American workforce.

Becker's nomination to the NLRB was opposed by Republicans, as well as a couple of Democrats, who argue he will bring bias in favor of labor unions to the position. Becker currently serves as a lawyer for the labor organizations SEIU and AFL-CIO and has spoken favorably of the Employee Free Choice Act, a bill that would make it easier for workers to unionize.

Mr. Obama also appointed labor lawyer Mark Pearce to the board, which serves as a referee between unions and management in labor disputes. Three of the five NLRB seats have been vacant for more than two years, keeping the board from addressing hundreds of labor disputes.

The advocacy group American Rights at Work praised the president for making the appointments, arguing that the dismal economy makes the NLRB's work that much more important.

"When jobs are scarce, workers are often forced to endure unfair working conditions," American Rights at Work executive director Kimberly Freeman Brown said in a statement. "America's workers need a fully functioning NLRB to mediate their claims for better wages, benefits and other rights now more than ever."

Amy Dean, who previously served as head of the AFL-CIO Labor Council in Silicon Valley, wrote at Huffington Post that "any effective jobs strategy in America requires an efficient and functioning NLRB."

"Populating the NLRB with people who have experience in mediation is vital for the economy as a whole," Dean wrote. "Becker, has real experience reconciling differences between parties, and this makes him a justified pick."

By contrast, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce blasted the appointment, saying "the business community should be on red alert for radical changes that could significantly impair the ability of America's job creators to compete."

The Workforce Fairness Institute, an organization that claims to be funded by "business owners who enjoy good working relationships with their employees," released a statement saying Becker's appointment "will only result in higher unemployment and more burdens on small businesses due to his willingness to enact administratively portions of the Employee 'Forced' Choice Act."

The group called the appointment a "payoff to union bosses at the expense of America's employers and employees."

The Republican National Committee also picked up on the political accusation, sending out a memo Saturday in part entitled "Union Bosses' Bailout Begins," CNN reports.

White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod defended the recess appointments on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday, blaming Republicans for blocking 77 of the president's appointees.

"The Republican Party has taken a position where they're going to try and slow and block progress on all fronts, whether it's legislation or appointments," he said.

Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) countered that on CBS' "Face the Nation."

"[President Obama's] recess appointments belie the fact that hundreds of his nominations have been confirmed unanimously by the Senate," DeMint said. "But he has had mixed in with these batch of nominations some pretty radical folks."

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said on CNN's "State of the Union" that the president has thrown "fuel on the fire at a time when the debate about politics is a very angry debate to begin with."

He predicted that the recess appointments would "cause the election of a lot more Republican Scott Browns in November who are determined to come in and provide some checks and balances in Washington to stop the overreaching of the government," referencing the election of Republican Sen. Scott Brown to the the heavily Democratic state of Massachusetts.


Add a Comment
by endurorob_5 March 30, 2010 7:54 AM EDT
It shows Obama's bias that he would appoint this guy to the NLRB. He will be in a position where he is suppose to arbitrate between the labor unions and business and yet it is no secret this guy is a schill for the labor unions. The whole thing is offensive.
Reply to this comment
by pasmalltown March 30, 2010 8:34 AM EDT
Speaking of offensive, i remember a "Raygun" appointee that wanted to buy a expensive set of gold plated china, "just like the set that Nancy purchased" for the White House and his Public Affairs officer had her dry cleaning picked up on a daily basis using the gov't limo. You say Obama shows bias, I say they all do.
by thinking-hurts March 30, 2010 7:02 AM EDT
Term Limits yes, we need to be talking to our neighbors, our co-workers, to your children at home every chance you get. This is the only way it will work.
ANY 2+ TERM MUST GO! this is for all Americans. We also need to look at there benefits.
The corruption, dishonesty, bribery, and all the fraud must come with punishment that is stiff.
Call your local TV station and tell them you will turn it off if they sell all the air time to the politician?s machines, telling us over and over how come they?re not the dishonest ones. We want the politician?s platform to be in writing from now on. And reprinting the parties? platform won?t work. Demand the truth and uphold the laws when investigating politicians. When the truth comes out demand it is aired as long as the lie was.
Reply to this comment
by RobAla March 29, 2010 9:57 PM EDT
This President is the most polarizing in my memory. His extreme views, and the appointment of extremists to positions of authority are tearing this country apart. Seems like he campaigned on unifying the nation. As soon as the election was over, so was his bipartisanship. We need a Congress made up of responsible adults.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 March 29, 2010 7:43 PM EDT
At least these people are qualified in the field, unlike "Brownie" at FEMA who was a horse show guy.
Reply to this comment
by pr_boxer March 29, 2010 6:16 PM EDT
It is the "National Labor Relations Board" after all, seems perfectly logical to have someone knowlegable about Labor Relations on that panel.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook