March 24, 2010 4:17 PM

GOP Lawmaker Darrell Issa Poised to Call for Special Prosecutor to Investigate White House

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Congress
(Credit: CBS)

Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Oversight committee, told CBS News Wednesday that he will call for a special prosecutor to investigate the White House if it does not address Rep. Joe Sestak's claim that he was offered a federal job in exchange for dropping out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary.

"If the public doesn't receive a satisfactory answer, the next step would be to call for a special prosecutor, which is well within the statute," Issa (pictured) told Hotsheet.

The California Republican has been pushing for the White House to provide details of conversations between Sestak and administration officials in the wake of Sestak's comment during a radio interview last month that he was offered a high-ranking administration job in exchange for dropping his primary challenge against Sen. Arlen Specter.

Asked if that job was secretary of the Navy, Sestak declined to comment. His press secretary told CBS News that the lawmaker stands by his original statement that he was offered the job in exchange for an administration post. Sestak did not drop out of the race.

On March 10th, Issa sent a letter to White House lawyer Robert Bauer asking for details about communications between Sestak and the White House. In the letter, he pointed to statutes he said could have been violated if Sestak was offered a quid pro quo arrangement in which he would be given an administration job in exchange for leaving the race.

Issa said the move may have violated anti-bribery provisions of the federal criminal code as well as prohibitions on government officials interfering in elections and using federal jobs for a political purpose. Violation of each provision is punishable by up to one year in jail.

The White House did not respond to Issa's letter by its March 18 deadline. Reporters have asked White House press secretary Robert Gibbs about the inquiry on six occasions.

On February 23rd, Gibbs said he had not looked into the matter. On March 1st, he said he had not made any progress on it. On March 9th, he said he did not have an update with him. On March 11th, he said he did not have anything additional on the matter. On March 12th, he said he did not have any more information on it.

On March 16th, Gibbs finally addressed the situation.

"Look, I've talked to several people in the White House; I've talked to people that have talked to others in the White House," he said. "I'm told that whatever conversations have been had are not problematic."

On Monday, Issa issued a second letter asking who Gibbs had spoken to about the matter and the basis for his comment that the interactions between the White House and Sestak were not problematic.

In the letter, Issa said that Gibbs' comments that he is "collecting direct evidence from witnesses" implies "that the White House is allowing its communications staff to carry out investigative tasks ordinarily conducted by legal professionals in the Counsel's office. Such slipshodness has all the makings of a cover up."

In an interview Wednesday, Issa stood by the notion that the White House is engaged in a cover up.

"I believe not answering our questions when in fact they have asked and gotten them answered" meets the standard for a cover up, he said. He compared the Obama White House to that of former President Richard Nixon and said it was not living up to its promises of transparency.

"Democrats, when they were not in the White House, had real objections to that idea of, 'whatever I want to do is OK,'" he said, referencing objections to Bush administration policy. "The public has a right to know who asked what, when. A congressman has made an allegation that is likely a felony."

Issa said that if he doesn't receive "satisfactory answers" to his letter by its April 5th deadline, "then the next step would be to call for a special prosecutor to investigate."

He said it is now "a lot easier" for the White House to respond because Gibbs "has the raw information that we asked for." Asked if he expected his call for a special prosecutor to be answered, Issa said, "I'm a practicing Christian, I have always believed in the redemption of souls." He said that if the issue generates enough publicity Democrats may feel forced to appoint a prosecutor out of "the fear of the voters."

Issa said that while backroom dealing is not uncommon in politics, an explicit quid pro quo arrangement crosses the line, and that there is no way to know exactly what happened until either Sestak or the White House provides details. Asked why he was taking up the fight, he pointed to efforts by Democrats on the House Oversight committee to examine Bush administration e-mails and the Valerie Plame matter and said he had the right to look into any potential violation of the Hatch Act.

"I'm not going to let this issue go away between now and November until it's resolved," Issa said.

"I think an unanswered allegation of a criminal activity is one that even a back burner boil will eventually lead to steam rising," he added. "I don't believe the question will stop being asked until original source information is delivered."

Asked if he wanted to comment on Issa's intention to seek a special prosecutor in the case, Gibbs said he would say "nothing more than what I said last week."


Add a Comment See all 267 Comments
by RatPackSixGun May 13, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
Collusion is highly illegal and should be investigated and if necessary prosecuted. It's not a witch hunt to insist on rule of law.

According to CBS poll on this page, 93% agree with me. That doesn't sound like a "Republican" witch hunt to me...or 93% of everyone else..
Reply to this comment
by bosniahertz October 22, 2010 2:00 AM EDT
Not a witch hunt if you happen to support republicans, come on .
by Smartvote March 28, 2010 10:40 PM EDT
How about we start off by addressing and getting Philip Berg's (a life long democrat) federal law suits addressed. B.O. and his attorney general have been able to delay those proceedings for almost two years...
This may amount to an exercise in how much can he get away with before they get caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
08-cv-1933, 09-5362, 08-cv-02254, 09-5080, 09-5161
http://obamacrimes.com/
Reply to this comment
by phillyfanaticoldtimer March 26, 2010 8:27 PM EDT
Odd that the Lefties always cry out for a special prosecutor when a Pub, like Foley gets caught with his pants down(not Barney of course) but when real bribes and deals unseemly come from the DNC, WH and the Congressional Black Caucus or in this case, Pa. with Sestak, oh the hue and cry of ,' nothing there, just move along.' What a bunch of phonies. The rule of law is not a high priority for this bunch of socialist pacifists and the Messiah in the WH. Read Andrew Nap. book on lies the Govt, (Feds) tell us all the time. This crowd in 14-15 months are Big Time Prevaricators and law breakers.
Reply to this comment
by davcor2 March 26, 2010 3:50 PM EDT
Again Republicans raising muk when they should be coming up with solutions for jobs and the economy. It is so apparent they are more concerned about being in power than about governing for the people.
Pretty soon there will only be a two party system in this country, Democrates and Independents.
Reply to this comment
by bosniahertz October 22, 2010 2:05 AM EDT
If I were sitting on 250 million, I probably wouldn't be worried where my next meal or anyone elses was coming from either. Just another rich politician with too much free time on his hands.
by mountainstates1 March 26, 2010 3:43 PM EDT
Hey Issa, as long as this witch hunt is on your own dime, I don't care. But don't you dare use a penny of my tax money on your right wing nut hunt!!
Reply to this comment
by RatPackSixGun May 13, 2010 5:02 PM EDT
Collusion is not a "witch hunt", it is highly illegal and should be fully prosecuted if it did in fact occur.
by fallen001 March 26, 2010 3:02 PM EDT
LOL!!!!

The GoP has gone off the deep end ... Fine, let's get this investigation going at the same time we get Cheney on the stand for his involvement in lying about Plame, Iraq, WMD, torture, secret renditions, cover-ups of Blackwater crimes, etc, etc, etc ...

I'm game ...
Reply to this comment
by infantryman1968 March 26, 2010 3:44 PM EDT
"What war crimes?" Nancy Pelosi

LOL
by infantryman1968 March 26, 2010 2:14 PM EDT
by skyk-2009 March 26, 2010 6:39 AM EDT
This Republiklan wants to investigate something? How about he starts with some REAL crimes.. something he can REALLY get his McCarthy loving soul into.. go after Darth Cheney! Now THERE is a criminal.


LOL

Did you know that Dennis Kuschinach did that very thing! He introduced legislation to investigate Bush and Cheney for war crimes and Obama said no. Better yet, Nancy Pelosi herself said "what war crimes?" hahhaahhahahaha
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti March 26, 2010 1:58 PM EDT
Where was this pea brained racist white wing wackos when the Bushoccio Crime Family was on their crime rampage?

We should be running these "people" from the GOP out of town. Before they hurt themselves.
Reply to this comment
by infantryman1968 March 26, 2010 2:11 PM EDT
LOL!

Time for you to shower, shave, put on a new dress and get out of your parents basement once in a while!
by Rodeo_Joe March 26, 2010 1:06 PM EDT
Does this even RATE to the fiasco handling of Hurricane Katrina where scores died? Where was this guy back then? Wasn't the Director of Fema some kind of a horse show judge? Watching American politics is what Europeans do for Comic Relief.
Reply to this comment
by gobnait March 26, 2010 12:01 PM EDT
Is it lost on liberal geniuses that SESTAK, the politican who made this claim, is a Democrat?!
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey March 26, 2010 1:22 PM EDT
[Is it lost on liberal geniuses that SESTAK, the politican who made this claim, is a Democrat?! ]

is it lost on you that it doesn't matter?
See all 267 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook