World Watch
January 14, 2010 9:07 AM

WHO Rejects Claims it Hyped-Up H1N1 Flu

By
Mimi Spillane
Topics
H1N1
This story was filed by CBS News producer Mimi Spillane in London.
(CBS)
Questions are being raised about the H1N1 pandemic and how it has been handled by the United Nation's World Health Organization (WHO) — which has been spearheading the response since reports of the virus surfaced last April.

In a strongly worded defense today, Dr. Keiji Fukuda, Special Adviser to the WHO Director-General on Pandemic Influenza, responded directly to the four major allegations:

• Whether this is really a pandemic
• Whether the WHO changed the definition of pandemic, i.e., dialed down the criteria to accommodate this outbreak
• Whether the WHO has overplayed the disease's effects
• Did any of these things happen because the WHO was unduly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to allow big pharma to ratchet up production of a vaccine for business reasons

Dr. Fukuda gave a firm "no" to all of these charges Thursday.

The WHO, he says, had always predicted this would be a mild pandemic, but that since the definition of pandemic is the worldwide spread of a disease, this definitely fits the criteria.

As to charges that the organization was influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, Fukuda acknowledges that the WHO reaches out to experts in situations like this, but has safeguards in place to guard against conflicts of interest.

The news conference became necessary after reports that the Council of Europe - a Europe-wide group that coordinates responses to situations affecting individuals - is calling for an investigation into the possible influence of the drug industry on how the WHO handled the H1N1 outbreak.

It all comes as many countries are trying to cut their contracts with suppliers of the H1N1 vaccine because only a small percentage of the ordered doses have been used.

Only one country is known to have rejected the vaccines - Poland. There, 145 deaths have been blamed on H1N1, but many Poles reportedly support the government's decision as a gesture against big pharmaceuticals.


Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by patrons99 January 17, 2010 8:59 AM EST
Kudos to Mike Adams. His Natural News article on January 17, 2010, titled _Thousands of Americans died from H1N1 even after receiving vaccine shots_ raises some very important questions that bear serious consideration and discussion. See the link below for the article.
http://www.naturalnews.com/z027956_H1N1_vaccine_CDC.html
Reply to this comment
by 13muluc January 15, 2010 12:51 PM EST
Hasn't anyone noticed that the WHO mouthpiece never refuted the second accusation? That's because it is true.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/16/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html

This is the reason he could say that this non-event met the WHO guidelines for a pandemic. The condition of high mortality was dropped. Any flu can now be called a pandemic.
Reply to this comment
by FabricSoftenerKills January 15, 2010 11:46 AM EST
"The fact that the H1N1 did not lead to major deaths is a good thing and not a bad thing."

... yes, except for that one trillion dollars wasted on useless, toxic, untested vaccines.

"I can see the comments should the WHO not done anything to prepare and the H1N1 was wide spread and deadly."

There would be no comment because nothing out of the ordinary happened. This was the first pandemic in 40 years but they had to change the rule to say that it's only the spread (which they could exaggerate) and not actual deaths (for which there were none). They also stopped testing for it and simply called every flu "H1N1". Meanwhile, if anyone dies of a pharmaceutical drug the cause of death is listed as organ failure, but if they had any flu-like symptoms it's listed as a swine flu death.

We were lied to about how pregnant women were more at risk, but in reality it was OBESE pregnant women who SMOKE who are more at risk (duh).

"This situation just shows you can?t please everyone,"

True, you can't steal money from some people and give it to others and please both sides. But as long as you are on the taking end...

"even if it is because not enough people died to please them."

The opposite is true - not enough people died to please Big Pharma.

"Everyone hates big pharma until they (or someone they love) need a life saving medicine.:"

And then they realize there is NO SUCH THING. OTHERWISE YOU MIGHT HAVE NAMED AN EXAMPLE. Sunlight, Spirulina and Cider Vinegar do more good than all of your pharmacology combined.

"Think about this: Doctors mainly treat all illnesses with medicine. "

Yes, they never do ask about the cause or study side effects. They prescribe drugs and cut out part of your anatomy.

"What would you all do if there was no medicine???????"

This was answered back in the 1970's when the doctors went on strike. They predicted "bodies would pile up in the streets" but the death rate actually went down. Because all doctors do is prescribe POISIONS like Vioxx and Warfarin and Lipitor.

"I know the comments I am going to get, so I just ask you to remember your comments when you or your love one is in the hospital receiving treatment."

You mean when they are being killed slowly but surely? Hardly treatment.

"At that time you will have the option to say no to the medicine (lets see if you do)."

... unless Pelosi-care passes and people like you succeed in making vaccines mandatory.

"Disclaimer: I am a pharmaceutical chemist so I may have a bias on this topic."

We knew this, but at least you're honest.
Reply to this comment
by FabricSoftenerKills January 15, 2010 10:38 AM EST
"Pharmaceutical companies have saved more lives than all the socialists combined."

This person is truly daft. First of all, governments (like socialists) killed 200 Million people in the 20th Century.

Next, Pharmaceutical drugs kill 100,000 people a year conservatively. Drugs like Vioxx were well-known to be dangerous Merck conspired to slander, murder and silence all critics. H1N1-gate is a huge embarassment to many but they are only smearing the poop stains all over themselves at this point.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=pharmaceuticals+kill+100%2C000+a+year&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Reply to this comment
by anti-global3 January 15, 2010 10:31 AM EST
grovesd,

actually you must be the moron, or else have an interest in big pharm. This was just another bailout designed to hide the fact that it was a bailout. The latest numbers in are showing a 50 billlion dollar profit for big pharm as a direct result of the vaccine prodution.
What should have been done was have the vaccine available to people through their doctors if they wanted it. If it were done that way the profit would have been much smaller or they may have actually taken a loss.
Instead the pharms stalled on starting production until the gov't promised to buy all of their supply. Once again the tax payers were fleeced and the gov't is sitting on a huge stockpile of vaccine that will soon be expired. This should show the govt' has no place running healthcare, all they know how to do is spend money.
Also I worked for Astra Zenica so I know how much money is in this industry. We didn't need to bail them out. If a few companies went under who cares? There is so much potential profit you would have other companies falling over each other to take the place of the busted company.
Reply to this comment
by Freedomforever88 January 14, 2010 4:41 PM EST
Normaly gov't and international burecratic institutions tell the truth. This one surprises me.
Reply to this comment
by lileoj January 14, 2010 3:24 PM EST
YES they overhyped it. We had more deaths this year to the COMMON flu than H1N1. Pandemic my puerto rican booty!!!
Reply to this comment
by grovesd January 14, 2010 3:00 PM EST
Anyone who claims this H1N1 response was a "scam to enrich pharmaceutical companies" is a moron. I would like it very much if those same morons would promise never to stand in line for their vaccine ever again. For the rest of us, I'm damn glad that there a smart people and highly capable corporations that can produce, test, and deliver vaccines when they are needed. Someday the virus we face will have much bigger teeth and those are the same companies our lives will all depend on.
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 January 14, 2010 3:15 PM EST
you realize that only 1/4 of the population got the vaccine and still survived? Don't worry, you can keep the gov fool-aide all for yourself. We don't need it.
by pdxdave January 14, 2010 3:24 PM EST
Pharmaceutical companies have saved more lives than all the socialists combined.

In fact,the left is known for mass murder. Stalin. Mao. Pol Pot. Hussein. Ho Chi Mihn.

They have slaughtered hundreds of millions of people. Yet the left demonizes drug companies who SAVE millions of lives.
See all 4 Replies
by pdxdave January 14, 2010 1:46 PM EST
Leftist do-gooder organizations think that the ends justify the means.

Just like the global warming hysterics, they think that lying and creating a panic in the cause of greater good is noble.

Line them all up against the wall.....
Reply to this comment
by jtdev1 January 14, 2010 2:44 PM EST
"Leftist do-gooder organizations ..."


Love it!

So they were also behind the SARS, Bird Flu, etc????

You know, the flu that never was? but our government spent Millions/Billions on vaccines for it? GWB & friends authorized it - remember???

"Leftists..." LOL
by hologram5 January 14, 2010 3:16 PM EST
by jtdev1 January 14, 2010 2:44 PM EST
"Leftist do-gooder organizations ..."


Love it!

So they were also behind the SARS, Bird Flu, etc????

You know, the flu that never was? but our government spent Millions/Billions on vaccines for it? GWB & friends authorized it - remember???

"Leftists..." LOL
=======================================
Yeah, they were. Every one of these things was released from a lab. They use this garbage to "create" vaccines against bio warfare and it ends up like this every time.
by jgg000101 January 14, 2010 1:08 PM EST
I'd say Dr. Fukuda's name says it all.
Reply to this comment
by jgg000101 January 14, 2010 1:20 PM EST
what's amazing is you can't type the freaken guy's real name without being censored and he's the head of World Health for the UN. How's that for an omen?
See all 31 Comments
.

Follow World Watch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook