U.S. officials: Assad regime running low on money
A Syrian rebel fighter salutes locals chanting slogans in support of the anti-regime uprising, in the Shaar district of the northern Syrian city of Aleppo, July 25, 2012.
/ AP Photo/Pierre TorresOfficials at the U.S. Treasury and State Departments tell CBS News that Syria is having problems finding a source to print its currency. That could make it harder for the regime to continue functioning as Assad's government burns through the state's central bank reserves.
Assad is estimated to have spent about half of Syria's sovereign wealth fund - essentially the nation's piggybank. It was estimated to be worth $5 billion just two years ago.
European Union sanctions - coordinated with the U.S. - have made it difficult for Syria to find new trading and banking partners. This is one of the financial tools that the U.S. is wielding.
For Syrians who escaped, agony of absence and prayers for justice
Syria rebels defiant ahead of Aleppo battle
Unilateral economic sanctions against Syria and 26 key members of the Assad regime were tightened again last week by the United States.
Still, sanctions are a blunt tool in a de facto financial war on Syria; the cost of living has skyrocketed not just for the Syrian regime, but also the Syrian civilians who support the opposition. Annual inflation is estimated to be up more than 30 percent.
The bottom line is that sanctions may not save any lives in Aleppo, which activists say is now surrounded by government tanks and had been strafed by fixed-wing aircraft earlier this week, ahead of the expected offensive.
But they are helping rebels in their fight against Assad.
U.S. officials believe Iran is now Assad's single remaining source for weapons. In a briefing at the State Department on Thursday, spokeswoman Victoria Nuland cited the presence of Qassem Suleimani, who directs a special unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in Damascus last week as an overt sign of active Iranian support for the Syrian regime.
EU sanctions have made it expensive and difficult for Russia to continue supplying military equipment to Syria, according to the U.S. officials.
State Department officials say the various rebel groups on the ground have requested different types of support from the U.S., but claim that they have all consistently said that they do not want "boots on the ground."
Various sources within the State Department have voiced fear that "Americanizing" the war in Syria would ultimately be divisive within rebel forces, and perhaps feed sectarian violence.
There is also little political will within U.S. leadership for an intervention.
However, multiple U.S. policymakers - who remain anonymous as they are not authorized to speak on intelligence matters - acknowledge that the U.S. is not stopping other allied states from giving weapons to the rebels.
The U.S. officially provides no "lethal" assistance to the rebels, on the grounds that guns could be used in sectarian warfare retributions, particularly in the event the Assad regime falls. Even actionable intelligence that could help guide rebel attacks on government forces is considered "lethal," and thus off the table. Instead, the U.S. is distributing satellite phones and communications equipment to rebel forces so they can communicate and coordinate their own movements.
That leaves the financial tools as the main weapon being used against the Syrian regime.
The U.S. is helping civilians by providing food via the World Food Program and U.N. relief agencies.
And Washington is also helping the Syrian rebels plan for that "day after" Assad falls. Though policymakers won't share details of the planning for various "hard" and "crash landing" scenarios - such as a coup from within Assad's military, or the total implosion of the Syrian state after Assad falls - the U.S. does consistently point to the principles laid out by the opposition in documents like the National Compact (commonly referenced as the rebel "Bill of Rights" that resulted from meetings in Cairo earlier this month) as proof that the U.S. has confidence in the values of the potential new Free Syrian government.
This Compact lays out plans for managing the military, the economy and the shift in power to a temporary governing body that would draft a constitution and hold elections within a year.
The month of August will mark one year since the time that President Obama called for Assad to step down. History may ultimately decide the success of what appears to be the so-called "Obama doctrine," of hoping to maximize impact using a minimum of military support.
U.N. leader Ban Ki-moon issued an ominous warning to the international community on Thursday while visiting Srebenica, the site of a massacre in Bosnia during the 1990s. He said he doesn't want to see any of his successors visiting Syria 20 years down the road, and apologizing for "what we could have done now to protect civilians in Syria, which we are not doing."
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Toronto mayor: I don't smoke crack cocaine
- Photos of the week 22 Photos
- 2 men from diverted Pakistani flight into U.K. arrested
- Graphic video: Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack Play Video
- Bangladesh slum life 13 Photos
- Deadly car bombing at aid group's house in Kabul
- Tokyo's rockabilly scene 16 Photos
- Muslim hard-liners ID suspect in London attack
----
Mariefr123, from forex gratuit sur http://www.forex998.com/
[SPECIFICALLY WITH REGARD TO IRAN AND ITS SYRIAN ALLY]
Why do some people refuse to accept the fact that what happens in one, sometimes remote part of the world,
can and likely WILL affect us sooner or later?
This writer and many others feel remorse for knowing that violence, torture, destruction, killing, wars and murder continue, often on 'grand scales'. However others celebrate and are joyful to see such horrible events, and even deliberately expend their energies and resources to incite more pain, suffering, torture, murder, etc. Are they doing so to satisfy their primitive needs of hate, punishment, revenge, and to see more blood spilled?
More importantly, should we dismiss these issues of violence, torture, wars and other horrors, as 'foreign internal matters', and permit all sorts of ominous 'overseas' developments to continue simply as none of our business?
In summary, we better make sure that we know what is happening, and what are the ramifications of developments beyond our borders, lest we permit another growing, and potentially world-consuming fascist movement to ultimately encroach upon us.
The following statement can be made with great certainty:
The current Iranian Islamofascist regime and its quest for Nuclear Weapons capability, as well as its agenda to impose strict Islamic Sharia Law onto the entire world must be stopped, before the price that the Western Free World will be made to pay in the not-too-distant future, will increase EXPONENTIALLY.
The regime sees it too -- though it looks the other way.
Nonetheless, the writing is on the wall.
And it was put there with the blood of the Iranians killed while peacefully protesting the Ahmadinejad election.
It is the shedding of innocent blood that started the Arab spring, and it will be the shedding of far more Iranian blood that will end it.
This is the fate sealed by the brutality of that regime in 2009.