World Watch
September 2, 2009 6:54 AM

More US "Trigger Pullers" Headed for Afghanistan

By
Tucker Reals
Topics
Afghanistan
5264155The Pentagon will swap out as many as 14,000 "clerical" and other non-combat troops for "trigger pullers" in Afghanistan — a way for commanders to boost the fighting force without altering the overall troop presence, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

The report, which cites anonymous defense officials in Washington, comes on the heels of U.S. commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal handing over his assessment of the war to his superiors at the Pentagon and in NATO. His analysis does not make specific recommendations on troop numbers, but it is widely later this year.

Officials told the Times that rotating out thousands of non-combat troops and replacing them with their frontline-ready comrades makes sense given the intensity of the fight against Taliban insurgents.

""It makes sense to get rid of the clerks and replace them with trigger-pullers," one Pentagon source told the paper. None of the officials who spoke to the Times were named, as the plans have not yet been officially announced, according to the report.

The officials told the Times' Julian E. Barnes that the troop-swap would not preclude a request for additional troops later in the year by McChrystal.

Commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, McChrystal's report calls for a revised strategy in the Afghan fight. One of the key elements is a recommendation that the focus of combat be shifted from taking the fight to militants in the country's rugged, rural areas to creating better ties with Afghans in population centers.

That philosophy will require more armed patrols in Afghanistan's towns and cities — work which can't be carried out by troops on clerical and support missions.

Officials who spoke to the Times said many of the non-combat troops rotated out of Afghanistan would likely be replaced by civilian contractors.

Private contractors behaving badly caused a huge headache for American war administrators in Iraq (think ), and the Afghan government has also taken issue with the armies of private citizens working for American dollars in their country.

An influx of 14,000 more private contractors could increase friction between Washington and Afghan leaders at a time when violence is increasing and questions over are getting louder.

A suspect in a roadside bomb attack last Friday was arrested with a cell phone containing a number to the Defense Ministry, and a new report by the United Nations says Afghanistan now has Latin-American-style drug cartels
— working in conjunction with the Taliban and corrupt government officials.


  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment
by babooph September 2, 2009 7:55 PM EDT
That full metal jacket will rebuild the nation & win hearts & minds.
Reply to this comment
by mljohns00 September 2, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
Great way to hide a 20% increase in troops in Afghanistan. On paper, we'll be at the same troop levels as before. We hire contractors for non-trigger-puller jobs and those won't show up in the troop count.
Reply to this comment
by wyodutch September 2, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
There ya go... fourteen thousand more job openings for the working class kids from the hills of West Virginia.
.
Meanwhile, with no requirement for the rest of America to risk anything in the occupation... the day traders, lobbyists, banksters and boardroom barons can ship their kids safely off to college.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 September 2, 2009 8:59 AM EDT
"Trigger pullers" seems a bit disrespectful. However, what I really take exception to is the idea that replacing support troops with contractors is somehow a good option. A service member in the war gets a couple hundred dollars of extra pay and tax-exempt status while deployed to a war zone. A contractor gets a 6-figure bonus on top of their regular pay which is already higher than the comparable support troop's. Doesn't make much sense if you ask me. If this is the way it is going to be, then why bother to keep training support personnel in the armed forces at all? Just contract out the whole bloody thing!
Reply to this comment
by whymayiask September 2, 2009 8:39 AM EDT
"TRIGGER PULLERS"? That is an utter disrespect to the men and women fighting for our freedom. Shame on you CBS. These men and women are willing to DIE so that you can write and speak your own thoughts.
Reply to this comment
by wyodutch September 2, 2009 9:20 AM EDT
Sorry Mac... My freedom of speech is guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It does NOT come to me because Afghanistan is being occupied by the American military.
by azure13 September 2, 2009 9:21 AM EDT
It's in quotes... Obviously the Pentagon used that phrase. I swear the vast majority of people that frequent these boards are illiterate.
Most of you don't even bother reading the story before you post.
You just read the title and go post your usual bs.
by Benton09 September 2, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
Pull our military troops out and give the job to Xe and Armorland (or whatever the h*ll they're called) and let them fight it since they're getting paid out the A** for it anyway. Just make it a contractor war. I'm sure that'll go over good with the snake charmer headwearers.
Reply to this comment
.

Follow World Watch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook