World Watch
May 8, 2009 6:57 PM

Message Sent By Bibi To Barack

By
Charles Cooper
Topics
World Watch
Remember that special relationship between Israel and the United States? You've got to wonder whether it's about to become a little less special.

Less than two weeks before President Obama is scheduled to host Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, public statements from the two allies suggest they have different ideas about the best strategy for peace in the Middle East.

So it was that as Israel got ready to celebrate the Jewish Sabbath on Friday, Netanyahu sent up a smoke signal that the White House should have no trouble deciphering. In a briefing with reporters from Russian-language newspapers, he said that Israel would never withdraw from the Golan Heights, which it took after defeating Syria during the 1967 Six Day War.

"Remaining on the Golan will ensure Israel has a strategic advantage in cases of military conflict with Syria," Netanyahu said, according to several Russian-oriented Israeli Web sites, which published the comments on Friday.

At the same time, Netanyahu offered a likely preview of his talking points for the tete-a-tete with the president.

  • Iran will be the top focus. Netanyahu referred to that country's nuclear enrichment program as "a major obstacle to peace in the Middle East."

  • Israel will not be forced into accepting preconditions for negotiating with the Palestinians. He also told the Russian-language outlets that Israel would not present preconditions for negotiating with the Palestinians, either.

    The State Department did not respond to requests for comment.

    In 1994, former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin supposedly passed a message to the Syrians. The gist of the communication was that Israel was willing to execute a full withdrawal to the June 4, 1967 borders in return for normalized relations between the two countries.

    Coming down from the Golan would be a traumatic experience for Israel. Successive Israeli governments have said the area was vital in affording the nation's army strategic depth. At the same time, however, the Syrian government - both under Hafiz Al Assad and now, his son Bashir-has demanded the Golan's full return as the prerequisite for any peace treaty.

    All this comes on the heels of recent reports out of Israel where unnamed officials have complained about reduced coordination with the Americans when it comes to security and state affairs since Obama and Netanyahu came to office.

    "Obama's people brief their Israeli counterparts in advance much less about security and Middle East policy activities than the Bush administration used to," according to the Israeli publication, Haaretz, quoting unnamed officials.

    One source quoted by the paper added that the U.S. is more interested to fostering a dialogue with the Arab states and Israel and that the Obama administration does not view Israel as a "special" or "extraordinary" state in the Middle East.

    It's perhaps coincidence but Obama's office today announced that the President will deliver his much promised speech to the Arab world on June 4 while he is in Egypt. (The next day, Obama is set to make another speech from the Buchenwald concentration camp in Germany.)
    Also of note: The State Department's top Middle East envoy, Jeffrey Feltman was in Damascus this week where he said the U.S. backed the pursuit of a comprehensive peace-including a deal between Israel and Syria.

    Watching the latest turns in the two countries' relationship, the conservative blog Little Green Footballs officially declared `The Breakdown of the 'Special Relationship' while on Commentary's web site, Jonathan Tobin concluded that recent signals from Washington should encourage what he described as "the anti-Israel left."

    He also had this to say:

    "No one should doubt the attraction that the futile quest for a Palestinian state (one that Israel's supporters want more than the Palestinians) holds for the State Department and other Middle East "realists." But it may ultimately be a clever way to continue prevaricating about Iran. Since no one can really believe that either Hamas or the powerless Palestinian Authority are the least bit interested in actually agreeing to a viable two-state solution at this point, what is the point in putting the screws to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about this? If, as recent reports claim, Obama insists on a strategy that makes the quixotic Palestinian track a higher priority than the Iranian issue, he is setting up a scenario that guarantees Tehran will wind up with nuclear weapons."


    So much for the coming attractions. In less than two weeks, the players will be on center stage.


    • Charles Cooper is an executive editor at CNET News. He has covered technology and business for more than 25 years, working at CBSNews.com, the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.

    Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
    by ToolMangler1 May 9, 2009 7:57 PM EDT
    Eventually there will be peace in the Middle East, the only concern is the man who brings it. When there is peace, true peace in the Middle East, the world will see things it once thought only existed in nightmares.
    Posted by debinok1 at 2:46 PM : May 9, 2009




    Even the AntiChrist will not bring 'true peace', True peace will occur one of two ways, Either some nut will start a nuclear war and kill every living thing on earth (No Life = Total peace) or Jesus will return as he said he would.
    Reply to this comment
    by U-R-So-Wrong May 9, 2009 6:10 PM EDT
    I do not speak of apocalypses. I speak only of the right of self-determination for those societies, those people and governments, based on the universal rights of man that the USA fought a revolution to defend.

    Those who post here in sympathy for the kings, hereditary presidents, generals and mystics who rule-over the clans and tribes of the Near East are in no way committed to our own revolution and should see themselves for what they are.
    Reply to this comment
    by debinok1 May 9, 2009 5:46 PM EDT
    Eventually there will be peace in the Middle East, the only concern is the man who brings it. When there is peace, true peace in the Middle East, the world will see things it once thought only existed in nightmares.
    Reply to this comment
    by U-R-So-Wrong May 9, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
    you're just to dumb to admit that you were wrong about creating a 'Jewish state' would work in the middle of the former territories of the Ottoman Empire and bring everlasting peace and security. Posted by whitemale08


    You say "Jewish state" with the distain that is usually absent when someone refers to a nation of Frenchmen or German or Spaniards. The Jews are so-named for Judea which is located in the West Bank, and Judea for the Jews. The political leadership of the region was allied with the Nazis during WW2. I could understand a post-WW2 redistricting of the map of Europe or the Near East as reparations for the crimes of those regimes, which have always been xenophobic.

    That's what the United Nations contemplated when recognizing Israel as a state with its own self-defense obligations. Not where you're coming-from, I assume, even though I'm not that bright about knowing bigots who've sold-out to oil money when I see one.
    Reply to this comment
    by whitemale08 May 9, 2009 12:28 PM EDT
    But I'm just smart enough to recognize someone pandering to the warlords of the Middle East.
    Posted by U-R-So-Wrong at 9:18 AM : May 9, 2009

    ...no you're just to dumb to admit that you were wrong about creating a 'Jewish state' would work in the middle of the former territories of the Ottoman Empire and bring everlasting peace and security.
    Reply to this comment
    by U-R-So-Wrong May 9, 2009 12:18 PM EDT
    you are too dumb to recognize irony and humor in the hypocricy of our media. Posted by whitemale08


    But I'm just smart enough to recognize someone pandering to the warlords of the Middle East.
    Reply to this comment
    by nojoy01 May 9, 2009 11:58 AM EDT
    I find it hard to imagine a successful peace agreement between Israel and a group of nation-states whose stated objective is the destruction of Israel. I can imagine the opening of a peace conference where Netanyahu says "what must we do to make peace with you" & the Palestineians answering "die". Yeah I know, I stole that from "Indepencence Day".
    Reply to this comment
    by whitemale08 May 9, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
    aryan whitemale08, I think we can do without your theories on racism.
    Posted by U-R-So-Wrong at 5:36 AM : May 9, 2009 --

    I call myself 'whitemale' to mock the media for making such a big deal out of the 'whitemale vote'.

    If you can't see that then I'm sorry you are too dumb to recognize irony and humor in the hypocricy of our media.
    Reply to this comment
    by paddyhayes May 9, 2009 9:47 AM EDT
    "HUSSEIN" is an Arabic name (speaking linguistically here), not a Muslim one.

    But I'm not surprised at all that you slack-jawed dittoheads are unable to differentiate between the concepts of language, religion, culture and ethnicity.

    Did you know that there are Christian Arabs? Do you recognize the name Tariq Aziz (not his given name at birth)? He is a Chaldean Catholic and, well, an Arab.

    See if you can determine which figure of recent history he was associated with. That might be a fun activity for you "Muslims want to kill Christians" folks.

    How about Michel Aflaq? You know. The Levantine Greek Orthodox guy that started the Ba'ath Party. Gosh! I thought those terrorists were hell-bent on eradicating Christians.
    Reply to this comment
    by U-R-So-Wrong May 9, 2009 8:36 AM EDT
    aryan whitemale08, I think we can do without your theories on racism.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 12 Comments
    .

    Follow World Watch

    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook