World Watch
February 20, 2009 2:13 AM

Kids' Peanut Allergy Treated, With Peanuts

By
Tucker Reals
Topics
World Watch
This story was written by CBSNews.com's Tucker Reals in London.
(AP / CBS)
Medical researchers at a Cambridge University hospital took four kids who were highly allergic to peanuts — eating the smallest amount would send them into possibly-deadly anaphylactic shock — and started giving them tiny doses of peanut flour ever day. Now, they can eat peanuts.

The small-scale study at Cambridge's Addenbrooke's Hospital successfully "desensitized" these kids to peanuts, by slowly feeding them larger and larger doses of their own personal kryptonite.

Other studies had tried this method before, but using injected doses of peanut oil or extract. They always failed.

The ) used miniscule portions of the flour, taken orally (as you normally would with a peanut), and then increased that dose over six months until all the kids could eat the equivalent of at least five nuts a day, some 10.

Good work, Addenbrooke's. I hope this is recorded as a victory for Team Common Sense. I'd love to know why it wasn't tried earlier.

I also hope that doctors in the Western world will stop telling pregnant women – my wife included — not to eat peanuts. I'm not a doctor, but the notion that exposure to small amounts of peanut via the placenta in the womb might actually cause an allergy simply doesn't make sense to me.

Several weeks ago, I read that babies with a severe allergy to cow's milk had also been successfully desensitized by doctors slowly building up their resistance. (Here's an article about that study.)

In China and Israel, where fetuses and young babies are routinely exposed to normal amounts of peanut as a matter of course, there are very few people with the allergy.

My wife has also been warned against eating sushi. I wonder how many women in Japan get the same advice. Another item on the list of taboo-food for pregnant women in the U.K. (and the U.S., if I recall) is soft cheese, such as brie.

We have a good friend who is English, but lived much of her life in France. She laughed when we asked her if she had avoided soft cheese during her pregnancy. Her little boy is happy and healthy, and eats everything.

Again, as a disclaimer, I'm not trying to give medical advice. I'm not qualified to do so and I think we get plenty of it anyway. Too much, perhaps.

  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
by p_nutallergymom March 17, 2009 2:50 AM EDT
Wow! It never ceases to amaze me that there are actually people out there that spend so much time commenting on subjects that they know absolutely nothing about!! Food allergies are not "CAUSED by silly, overly sensitive parents who deny their kids anything to which they think those children might possibly be allergic." I know this because my 4 year old is allergic to peanuts....and I am not a silly, overly sensitive parent that denied my child anything!!And actually I had "never, ever given credence to this allergy-phobic nonsense and (surprise, surprise)" I came home from work one day to find him finishing a p'nut butter cracker and 15 min. later he was having trouble breathing. That was the 1st reaction. Now if you spent some time researching the subject for which you are commenting on, you might actually know that allergies are not caused by avoidance!! We help our child avoid peanuts because if can KILL him!! We are not talking itchy hives and a little swelling that will go away with a little benadryl! Our child can stop breathing if he eats anything with peanut in it! The number of children with food allergies are growing...why? who knows. But what I do know is that every time I hear my baby asks me can I eat that mommy? Does it have peanuts in it? It breaks my heart. Or the fact that he had to sit at a different table at preschool because of the risk of cross contamination causing him to have a reaction. And until you have a child that something so simple and so common could take their life maybe you should keep your uneducated hypothesis to yourself.
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit February 23, 2009 12:54 AM EST
More of the same, "I smoked and didn't get lung cancer, so smoking doesn't cause lung cancer." "I ate raw chicken and didn't get sick, so it doesn't need to be cooked." "I ran across the freeway and didn't get hit, so the fences are unnecessary." - right?

Some things doctors suggest, they will be wrong about - others - perhaps peanut sensitive kids in other countries simply die. There aren't that many here - it's a completely overblown fear - it could be missed or ignored often enough in other countries.

This is a good study, finding a solution - but it only lets these kids eat 5-10 peanuts a day - this is no miracle cure. Allergies may be better cured by exposing the kids - or doing so may result in dead babies as they cannot tell you their throat is swelling shut. Not something to gamble with, nor something to take advice from a person who is just guessing, rather than from medical research and studies.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale09 February 22, 2009 10:13 PM EST
Here's an idea...why not stop poisoning us with processed food.

Processed food like high-fructose syrup is used in hydraulic fluid, and most preservatives are nothing but plastic synthetics and by-product waste materials from petroleum products.
Reply to this comment
by itbnicole February 21, 2009 1:09 AM EST
I'm allergic to peanuts and nuts....nuts im severly allergic to, but with peanuts i just breakout. would this work with nuts, like if i used a nut flour or something like that. i've been missing out on a lot so i've been told.
Reply to this comment
by brainteaser2 February 20, 2009 10:32 PM EST
like cures like is also the basis for homeopathic "medicine". Although I largely consider homeopathy to be quackery in this case it is the back bone of allergy desensitization. I too believe overly cautious parents are the cause of a good deal of this. Many allergists now make sure their kids are exposed to as much germy and foreign material as possible. They definitely don't follow their kids around with bottles of 'lysol'.
Reply to this comment
by imrebeke February 20, 2009 4:41 PM EST
I have long thought that the increase in various food allergies is actually CAUSED by silly, overly sensitive parents who deny their kids anything to which they think those children might possibly be allergic. This omniphobia, this all-encompassing fear of everything that has stricken the touchy-feely parenting crowd like some bizarre mass case of Munchausen-by-Proxy is not only unreasonable, it has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Allergies are most often treated by exposing the patient to ever increasing amounts of the allergen. It follows - logically speaking - that isolating a child from potential allergens will actually increase the child's sensitivity.

As the parents of four children, my wife and I have never, ever given credence to this allergy-phobic nonsense and (surprise, surprise) our kids aren't allergic to anything, so far as we can tell.

In fact, back when kids ate mud and bugs, you rarely, if ever, heard of allergies to milk, strawberries, peanuts and what have you. That's not to say we shoudl feed our kids insects and dirt, but it does give us some insight into why the phenomenon of hypergrowth in allergies may be coming about.

Get a clue, people. You can't protect your kids from everything and trying to do so to the irrational extent we Americans do of late will only cause them more harm than the things from which you are supposedly defending them.
Reply to this comment
by billpl-2009 February 20, 2009 1:19 PM EST
"...I hope this is recorded as a victory for Team Common Sense..."

common sense?!?
kryptonite for bible-thumping conservatives and tree-hugging liberals alike.

Reply to this comment
by ztiwmom February 20, 2009 1:02 PM EST
I ate peanuts & drank lots of milk with my first pregnancy. I ended up with a child allergic to both.

My second pregnancy I carefully avoided milk and peanuts as well as many common allergens. I got a child who was not allergic to milk, but peanuts, treenuts, and other legumes.

My third pregnancy I again avoided those 'typical' allergic foods, and I got a child with no food allergies.

I think our family has a tendency toward allergies & it manifested itself in food (and environmental)in our children. I believe scientifically it is not known at this time why people are reacting more often to foods. Work is being done to study this.

I hope research continues at this point as my son at age 13 is thought to have a lifelong milk allergy. I hope studies like you brought to light change all this.

I appreciate the info about the study but be very careful with your unborn baby! The cheeses and raw fish have nothing to do with food allergies and present real danger to an unborn baby.

I wish you the best for a healthy baby.

Reply to this comment
by robert7562 February 20, 2009 12:01 PM EST
What's the big suprise here? Any allergy preventive, along with all vacinations against dideases, contain elements of the "offending" subtance. Even something as simple as basic as a poison ivy allergy "vaciene" has, as its' base (can you guess what???) yes, poison ivy.
God, you just have to love the experts and their all knowing expertise
Reply to this comment
by joepharmacis February 20, 2009 11:37 AM EST
I don't think that allergy is the problem with eating soft cheeses during pregnancy - it's actually listeriosis caused by the listeria bacteria. Listeria can be found in unpasteurized soft cheeses and can cross the placenta to cause harm to the foetus (including miscarriage/death). This happened to a friend of mine but thankfully due to prompt diagnosis and treatment with antibiotics the baby was ok.
Reply to this comment
See all 12 Comments
.

Follow World Watch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook