World Watch
September 14, 2011 1:50 PM

Cuba: U.S. embargo causes $1 trillion in losses

By
Portia Siegelbaum
Topics
World Watch ,
Obama Foreign Policy
(Credit: CBS/iStockphoto)

Cuba blames the U.S. embargo for nearly a trillion dollars in losses to the island's economy since it was imposed by President Kennedy in 1962.

Vice Foreign Minister Abelardo Moreno said that at current prices a conservative estimate of economic damages to the island up until December 2010 would be more than $104 billion. However, he added, if you take into consideration the extreme devaluation of the dollar against the price of gold on the international financial market during 2010, they would add up to nearly a trillion dollars.

Cuba will be presenting a resolution at the current U.N. General Assembly on the "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed by the United States of America against Cuba."

This will be the 20th time the same resolution is put to a vote there. It has repeatedly been approved by the international community. Last year's vote was: 185 countries in favor to 2 -- the United States and Israel -- against.

Speaking to journalists in Havana, Moreno insisted the embargo violates international law and the U.N. Charter, and constitutes genocide according to the 1948 Geneva Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

Yesterday President Obama authorized the continuation of the embargo for another year under the Trading with the Enemy Act, stating that it is in "the national interest of the United States" to do so.

Moreno particularly attacked the extra-territoriality of the embargo listing various fines imposed by the U.S. on third country entities such as a $500 million fine against the Dutch Bank ABN Amro last year for "having carried out unauthorized financial transactions in which Cuba or Cuban Nationals had interests."

The vice foreign minister noted that in all from March 2010 to April 2011 there were several multimillion dollar fines levied against U.S. and foreign banking institutions for having conducted operations with Cuba.

He also noted the embargo interfered with Cuba's cooperation with international agencies giving the example of how in January 2011, the U.S. Government seized over $4.2 million of funding from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria because they were earmarked for the implementation of cooperation projects with Cuba.

The Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 further codified the original embargo into law so as to maintain sanctions on Cuba until Havana takes steps toward "democratization and greater respect for human rights." The Helms-Burton Act passed by Congress in 1996 added yet further restrictions to prevent U.S. citizens from doing business in or with Cuba.

In 1999, President Bill Clinton expanded the embargo even more by prohibiting foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies from trading with Cuba. This led among more serious moves to the removal of Cuban-made pajamas from shelves in Wal-Mart in Canada.

Clinton did authorize the sale of certain humanitarian products to Cuba in 2000 only on a cash basis with no credit permitted.

The policy has pitted pro-embargo Cuban-American exiles against many business leaders and agricultural producers who insist trade with Cuba would benefit American farmers, port workers and others. The U.S. Rice Federation has lobbied hard in Washington believing that Cuba could once again become the largest foreign market for American grown rice, a position currently held by Mexico.

At present the U.S. State Department says the biggest obstacle to improving relations between the two countries is the imprisonment of an American aid worker Alan Gross.

Gross was arrested in December 2009 and sentenced last March to 15 years in prison for bringing illegal communications equipment into Cuba as part of a program subcontracted to his employer by USAID. The Cubans say this program and others like it are intended to overthrow throw their government.

Moreno refused at this morning's press conference to respond to a question on Gross.

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson left Havana this morning after a week's efforts to see the American who is being held in a Havana military hospital. Yesterday Richardson told foreign journalists in Havana that the Cuban Government had rebuffed all his appeals.

Nevertheless, President Obama said yesterday in Washington that his administration's relaxation of the travel ban that now allows more Americans to visit Cuba on educational, religious, cultural or people-to-people group trips would remain in effect as would the loosening of restrictions on the amount and frequency with which Cubans in the U.S. could send money to relatives on the island.


Add a Comment
by retiredgustav September 14, 2011 5:24 PM EDT
Someone needs to go back and study history. The Cuban embargo was instituted by Republican President Eisenhower on October 19,1960. President Kennedy did not take office until January 20, 1961.
http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/on-this-day/September-October-08/On-this-Day--Eisenhower-Places-Embargo-on-Exports-to-Cuba.html
Reply to this comment
by expatriate2 September 14, 2011 4:54 PM EDT
Unlike the U.S. embargo on Iraq that cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of children, Cuba is actually better off with the embargo. If the embargo were lifted, the island would be drenched with U.S. investors wanting to exploit its beaches and scenic landscape with hotels and casinos. The embargo has kept the ecostructure of Cuba intact and it remains a habitat for many creatures that would have been pushed into obscurity without the embargo. I've been there and to the Cuban people, the embargo has little to do with their daily lives.
Reply to this comment
by krisd999-2009 September 14, 2011 4:06 PM EDT
Every American should go to Cuba to see the result of socialist economics. Maybe that's why Obama wants to penalize Americans for going to Cuba so they don't see the end result of Obama's economics in America. It's un-American to prohibit us from traveling.Are we living in a communist country or what?
Reply to this comment
by curveball7 September 14, 2011 3:23 PM EDT
No comment is made in the story about the repeated Cuban demands of the release of the Cuban 5. You can't talk about Gross and not mention them and still consider this piece complete.
Reply to this comment
by hillbillyvol September 14, 2011 3:07 PM EDT
Growing up listening to our leaders talking about the "Reds" and the domino theory, our government along with our corporations have turned a ready hand towards Communist China. Thousands of miles from our shores lies China. Ninety miles from our land is Cuba. We could use them and they could use us. It makes perfect sense to open doors with our neighbor. We have more to fear from Mexico and the civil war that is raging on our borders rather than Cuba. Let's get it started.
Reply to this comment
by expatriate2 September 14, 2011 3:19 PM EDT
As a resident of Mexico, I object to your calling the violence here a "civil war." It is not. It is a commitment by the Government of Mexico to assist in the fight to prevent drugs from entering the United States. Given that, it is as much your war as ours.

I do, however, agree with your stance on Cuba.
by jmailbox September 14, 2011 4:11 PM EDT
hillbillyvol...

You're missing something important. Yes the United States does business with comunist China, not by choice, but because China is using a lot of resources, namely labor resources to out produce in manufacturing all other countries except the United States.

The only economic value Cuba has is Rice, Cigars, and Nickel. Other then that, that is about it.

It's also a matter of opinion in this country, when Cuba hooked up with the Soviet Union during the "Cuban Missle Crisis". Because of that incident, that's what is keeping the embargo going, because then leader Phidel Castro was involved in that.

It's very simple, if Cuba wants to get rid of the Embargo, then get rid of the Castro's and the communist country.
.

Follow World Watch

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook