World Watch
By

Tucker Reals /

CBS News/ May 3, 2011, 10:33 AM

Logan: Pakistan has U.S. "blood on its hands"

Osama compound CBS

Pakistan's government has argued for almost a decade that it is doing everything in its power to fight extremist groups on its soil.

CBS News senior foreign affairs correspondent Lara Logan says that's quite simply a lie.

Logan says the Pakistanis have proven effective at targeting and killing Islamic militants inside their own territory, launching a battery of offensives against various Taliban factions and other groups.

Watch Lara Logan on "The Early Show" in the video player below

Pakistan: We didn't know bin Laden was here

But that success has been largely limited to groups which aim to destroy the Pakistani government. Military action devoted primarily to serving its own interest, in other words.

"This is an argument they made successfully in the last 10 years. The reason they're able to get away with so much," Logan said Tuesday on the Early Show -- the day after Osama bin Laden was killed in an elaborate compound in a town where thousands of Pakistani soldiers are trained every year.

Special section: The Killing of Osama bin Laden

Other groups, including networks linked to the Taliban -- some of which were created explicitly by the nation's security agencies and which have broader anti-Western and anti-U.S. aspirations -- are given too much freedom, says Logan.

"If you walk in Arlington Cemetery, past the fresh graves of American soldiers coming back from the field over there, Pakistan has some of the blood on its hands. They need to answer for that."

"Clearly they're not doing everything they can," said Logan. "And more importantly, they're not going to do everything that counts."

The raid on bin Laden's family compound in Abbottabad left Pakistan "caught with their pants" said Logan. "They're in hot water. They know it."

Pakistan's leader insists his government had no idea bin Laden was hiding right under the noses of his own military and intelligence agencies.

On Tuesday, senior U.S. and Afghan diplomats met Pakistan's foreign secretary in Islamabad. The three men gave a news conference to show solidarity, and express hope for even greater cooperation going forward.

"As diplomatic as the U.S. has been publicly, you can bet it's been a different story behind the scenes," said Logan.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is the CBSNews.com foreign editor, based at the CBS News London bureau.

24 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Bambay says:
Greetings Ladies and gentlemen.
I read in the Washington Times that "Former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf on Monday accused the U.S. of violating his country's sovereignty by sending in special forces to kill Osama bin Laden."
. However, I believe it is premature to levy blames as no evidence has surfaced that the Pakistani government had any idea Osama Bin Laden was in Pakistan. Nonetheless, I found Mr. Musharraf's accusation and condemnation of the U.S. of violating the territorial integrity of Pakistan highly contradictory.
Firstly, both countries have had bilateral relations for years, have supported each other in the same mission to eliminate what he calls a common enemy. He stated,"If two organizations [are] conducting an operation against a common enemy, there has to be trust and confidence in each other," And added, "Pakistan is "totally on board" on fighting al Qaeda and Taliban."
Well, well, well, if Pakistan is on board to fight a common enemy, would he be concerned with what explanation to give to satisfy the other, so as to maintain the trust or condemn the act, when in fact, both have been searching for ten or more years, five of which he was a guest in the other's home, living luxuriously?
Yes, Chapter 1, Article 2, item 4 of the U. N. Charter states, "All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."
1. The purpose is to " achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion."
Lets not forget that Bin Laden has served as a threat to nations peace and security, impaired the way of life of many countries including Pakistan, except it was a ploy to make believe that they too were threatened by this man, I see no reason for Mr. Pervez Musharrafs frustration.
A Pakistani citizen was killed in self-defense by an American diplomat and he said nothing. To me that should have concerned him more than a man who has taken the lives of hundreds-of thousands of human lives and continues to threaten lives and peoples' ways of life..

Therefore, America's purpose there was not to infringe on the Territorial integrity of Pakistan nor to disrespect or serve as a threat to their independence rather, to continue the operation, that he, Mr. Musharraf acknowledges, the two organizations, or countries if you will, America and Pakistan, [are] conducting against a common enemy, Osama Bin Laden, with the trust and confidence that Pakistan who are "totally on board" on fighting al Qaeda and Taliban, haven been a difficult task, as the very person, OBL, had, on numerous occasions eluded both organizations, America and Pakistan, that he will express gratification that one of the two has accomplished the mission of finding him, in Pakistan, and in order that Osama does not go back in hiding, America decided that Pakistan who is an ally will be informed after the mission is accomplished. After all, Osama Bin Laden was residing in Pakistan illegally, if the government had no knowledge of his residency there, in Abbottabad, two hour's drive from Pakistani capital, among military retirees, for five years; five years, "without Mr. Musharraf, the Pakistani Immigration and ISI even knowing about it.
I believe many things will be discovered in this situation. Mr. Musharraf should think of explaining than accusing at this point because it is an embarrassment for the whole of Pakistan who "are" the ally that hosted the common enemy, with all luxurious facilities and beautiful women too.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
zunitribe says:
I feel that the people of Pakistan have committed an act of war against the United States. I say we nuke the bastards
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Faith_In_Jesus says:
Superman would never have gloated...

I am just sad that our President (who has won the Nobel Peace Prize) can lift up his arch enemy as a trophy and show to the entire world that we kill first and ask questions later.
It is time to ban execution style death squads, bombs that kill civilians and torture!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Zain2011 says:
Totally surprised and hurt by the article .. Does anyone in US have any clues how many Pakistani are killed by this monster too .. how many bomb blast by these fanatic have killed innocent Pakistani citizens ? any one care about that .. I believe the number is close to 26000 ... thousands .. and then you see this article that simply defies sacrifices by a nation that US suspect to be an enemy too ? Yes they are incompetent to not track him down but the government there is corrupt to core and every one in Politics there are there to get money and run away to foreign coutry I mean for god sake the President of the nation was once called MR 10% ??? ... Yes US should not give them more money because really its only used by the highups there to get great mentions like this .. I mean really I wont be surprised if this mentsion bin laden get killed was build on US money .. may be ? So stop the bashing and help this nation clean themselves up ... The blame of not finding this guy lies on US as much as Pakistan even more with all the technologies/money at their hands...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kbbpll says:
Good job, Lara.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JamesBowen says:
I assume that this Lara person isn't pretending to be a journalist, right? What I prefer is statements backed by facts not opinion and conjecture.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
49KC says:
I agree, Lara. And bin Laden was housed protectively close to Pakistan's military academy, a location which also serves to deflect our soldiers from searching in that area. I wish President Obama had been president in 2001--we needed a good thinker for president then, someone along the lines of an Eisenhower and Montgomery who planned well before using force. Kudos to President Obama for not trusting Pakistan to knock on bin Laden's door and inquire who lived there. President Obama is a good thinker, he kept the focus on that house, he opted for the most secret and most risky--yet also the most likely--result. Going further, doesn't this prove that common sense, superb intelligence, using your wits, and good leadership at home can achieve more than charging blindly into Iraq and Afghanistan? Also why would a millionaire like bin Laden hide in a cave when he could pay for a better hiding place with amenities? This whole Iraq and Afghanistan war thing has always seemed to be a phony deal, and most Americans thought something was phoney, you can feel it in your gut.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pdchapin says:
I'm amused by the position the Pakistan government finds itself in. Either it's been dishonest or it's completely incompetent. And it's all there for the world to see. They're basically in the position of trying to convince the world that they didn't have a clue what was happening near their own military installation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jpatootie says:
Yes, we have US blood on OUR hands. Why are we now blaming Pakistan for US not finding Bin Laden sooner?
reply
davefromdayton replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
They refused to let our military into Pakistan to look for bin Laden under the guise of finding him for us if he entered the country. He lived with their military for 5 years. When they claimed to raid the compound, it was a grass field. They harbored our greatest enemy!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hillbillyvol says:
Rumsfeld was an idiot thinking the tribal leaders would help the US over their own "cousins". We don't look, think, worship, or live like those people. It is the same thing as in Vietnam. We need to get out. If they go back to dirty deeds, then we saturate them with ordinance.
reply
preacherbob1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Thank you for a glimpse of common ense.
piercetheval replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
...Amen...
See all 24 Comments