Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is TIME Magazine's Person of the Year for 2010.
/ SALVATORE DI NOLFIThe annual online vote asks readers to choose the most influential person, people or things from the previous year.
Readers voted a total of 1,249,425 times, and the favorite was clear, TIME reported. Julian Assange raked in 382,020 votes, giving him an easy first place. He was 148,383 votes over the silver medalist, Recep Tayyip Ergodan, Prime Minister of Turkey.
The magazine's editorial choice of Person of the Year will be unveiled Wednesday.
Assange and WikiLeaks made first made headlines this year in April, when his organization released a video allegedly showing two Reuters employees being fired upon by the U.S. Military. In July, WikiLeaks released 92,000 documents related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Assange's biggest splash came in November, when his organization began releasing the first of a reported 250,000 secret U.S. diplomatic cables.
Assange is currently sitting in a London jail awaiting further hearings on his possible extradition to Sweden to face sexual assault charges. Assange and his lawyers have dismissed the charges as politically motivated.
While Assange won Time's online poll, Lady Gaga won the Facebook poll time set up. The ubiquitous pop starlet received 65,417 "likes" on Facebook to Assange's 45,643.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was the 2009 Time Person of the Year.
Online Poll: TIME Readers Vote on Top Ten People of the Year
1. Julian Assange
2. Recep Tayyip Ergodan
3. Lady Gaga
4. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
5. Glenn Beck
6. Barack Obama
7. Steve Jobs
8. The Chilean Miners
9. The Unemployed American
10. Mark Zuckerberg
If you are afraid to speak the truth you have ALREADY lost your freedom!
Assange did not embarass anyone.
His targets already embarassed themselves by their behaviour.
There is a huge difference between national security and secrecy maintained to cover corruption and lies.
Big Brother IS dirty. Read '1984!' The defence of freedom doesn't come cheap. Have you read any history?
Thank goodness for an articulate man with the courage of his ethical convictions.
Get it all out in the open.
Demand respect for DEMOCRATIC values.
Viva Assange!
I take a wide-angle view of this controversy--as I came-of-age during the Nixon Watergate scandal. If it hadn't been for the journalists who broke the Watergate scandal, history might have turned-out differently. Presidents, from then on, could be B-Movie Stars (Reagan), Peanut Farmers (Carter), the head of the CIA (Bush, Sr.) or the owner of a team (Bush, Jr.)
In other words, the dignity of the highest-office in America had been compromised, and being erudite was not valued (VP who misspelled 'potato')....
Also: the wars we fought, after Viet Nam were summarily censored. I was teaching at Nato Hdqtrs when Schwarzkoff censored the press. From there, it became the status quo.
Also: if the press wanted "access" they often compromised their news stories. As the NYT Editor-in-Chief said of Julian Assange, and news in general: 99% of the news we're given has little or no significance to our lives. (paraphrased).
It's interesting that Mark Zukerberg was voted "Man of the Year," by Time Magazine. As the BBC said, (and I paraphrase) who would vote for a man who sells your privacy as man of the year?
Julian Assange, as even Hillary Clinton attests to, and others as well, the Wiki-Leaks are not dangerous breaches of security, but just embarrassing. Now, perhaps to stave-off the upcoming "leaks" about Bank of America, it is cutting off Assange by refusing to process his donations.
What shall we make of Julian Assange? That if you take the brave step of releasing embarrassing leaks about governments, wars, and powerful corporations, that you can expect to have your reputation skewered, bogus charges and even Interpol to assail you even further?
I, for one, applaud the courage it takes to tell the truth. Just perhaps it will end a win-less war in Afghanistan, and call all politicians and governments to be accountable for their actions and policies.
His victory means something very clear: we want greater freedom on the Internet.
Julian a fait parler de lui, normal qu'il soit en premi?re place.
il faut ?sperer que la justice ne sera pas injuste envers "julian assange", en l'accusant ? tort.
mark zuckerberg class? en bas de la liste, c'est bien fait!
?a lui servira de le?ons
****************************************************
Julian was talking about him, it is normal for first place.
Hopefully justice will not be unfair to "Julian Assange", accusing him falsely.
Mark Zuckerberg ranked at the bottom of the list, well done!
it will serve as lessons au revoir