World Watch
By

Mark Phillips /

CNET/ September 29, 2010, 10:04 AM

Beware of Governments Trumpeting Terror Threats

Fans of the movie Men in Black will be smirking quietly at the European terror plot story currently circulating.

According to reports attributed to security forces, al Qaeda affiliated groups have been planning Mumbai-style commando attacks in western Europe - and only strikes using unmanned U.S. drones in the lawless tribal areas of Pakistan have derailed those attacks by targeting the terror cells which have been planning them. The Mumbai attacks, organized by a terror group in Pakistan, killed more than 170 people in 2008.

In the film, the Will Smith character, unhappy at the lack of urgency being shown in dealing with the latest alien threat to Earth says, "But there's an Arquillian battle cruiser that's about to destroy the planet!" He's told to calm down.

"There's always an Arquillian battle cruiser, or a Corillian death ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet," the Tommy Lee Jones character tells him. It's the same with terror. The threat is always there. There are ways to measure whether it is really increasing.

Tellingly in this case, neither Britain nor Germany - two of the allegedly targeted countries - have raised their security alert levels. France raised its level half a click (to "reinforced red") earlier this month because of the perceived increased threat from North African jihadists angry over French attempts to ban the wearing of the burqa by Muslim women. French authorities have received several phoned-in bomb threats in the past weeks, including two at the Eiffel Tower. All were hoaxes. There's even speculation in the French press that President Nicolas Sarkozy, currently unpopular over other domestic issues, knows the suggestion of a public security threat can do wonders for your poll ratings.

In any event, al Qaeda doesn't generally issue warnings.

There has been an increase in unmanned drone strikes in Pakistan lately and that is being tied to the story of this new threat. But others in the security establishment are wondering, again quietly, whether the new alleged threat is being used as a cover for a drone offensive in Pakistan, one that is understandably unpopular with the Pakistani population (which often becomes collateral damage in the strikes) and with the unstable Pakistani government.

Germany's interior minister said Wednesday that there are "no concrete pointers to imminent attacks in Germany ... the current pointers do not warrant a change in the assessment danger level." German intelligence sources have told news outlets there that the plot was an "aspiration" but "no substantial plans and no explosives."

Meanwhile, a well-informed British source went so far as to tell CBS News he's been told by law enforcement officials that the reports of a foiled plot are, "a load of old rubbish which have been planted to justify the increased drone attacks taking place in the tribal areas" of Pakistan.

The information on the plots is reportedly coming from three German-Pakistani dual nationals who have been arrested and are being questioned. The reliability of their information is suspect. People wanting to kill you is different from people are actively planning, organizing the teams, securing the weaponry and implementing plans to kill you.

Another thing: moving to higher threat alert levels would start to cost money. More security personnel would have to be put on duty. Closing train stations and airports even temporarily costs a fortune. Terror groups can have a destabilizing effect without actually blowing anything up.

If you want to know whether anti-terror authorities are really worried, look at the threat alert levels. The rest is background noise.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
babooph says:
US founding fathers faced Indian "terrorism" all along the west& pirates & privateers east-THEY STILL BOLDLY PUT IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS-our present bunch used Islam as an excuse to put in the Patriot act & end their noble work....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1ChristianWoman says:
The address of their New York City Victory Mosque aka "Park 51"' is #45-47 Park Place. Quran / Surah 51:45-47......51:45 "And they were unable to rise, nor could they defend themselves"....51:46 "And [We destroyed] the people of Noah before; indeed, they were a people defiantly disobedient"...51:47 "And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [it's] expander"... ...@(astuteblogger)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
usernamefatigue says:
If there is not enough terrorist threat to justify the perpetuation of profits in "counterterrorism" then all that is required to incite a new round of retaliation, fear, anger, and profits with escalating drone attacks in Pakistan and other vulnerable Muslim-majority countries.

War Inc. will remain the most profitable racket on earth, so long as their host countries remain ignorant, blinded by fear and disinformation. The war pigs will not move on to the next most exceptionalist/hubristic nations until the US economy is completely wrung out. The recent warnings are routine market research in fear-mongering in Europe, and also routine cover for further incitement of the Muslim boogeyman to actually attack Murka again. If the timing is right, USis will elect reactionary hawks who will pull out all the stops in delivering the nation's wealth to the merchants of death who are laughing from behind all their patriotic and nationalistic cover.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
OIF_to_USC says:
Wow, you mean Bush and Cheney were ... not ... behind all of this after all? Gee, do you think that maybe it really was ? al-Qaida ? that planned and launched 9/11 back in 2001? Poor al-Qaida has been trying to get some recognition for their dirty deeds for years. May they'll finally get some without MoveOn.org and Code Pink banging their drums and tambourines, and implying that 9/11 was an inside job.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RHBennett10 says:
When it comes to the news, history proves we cannot trust the government. They have manipulated and leaked to justify their actions since WWII. Do we forget the "weapons of mass destruction" lies that were leaked. Do we forget the fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident. We should be take the bait again. The US military and its Commander and Chief are at an em pass and they will do anything to get there way as Gen McCrystal tried stupidly. As we press for the facts and details of this "alleged" plot you can count on them hiding behind the veil of National Security. This veil remains the greatest threat to our security and not the bogey men they contrive.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bubeard says:
So what is this I'm supposed to be wetting myself with fear about now? Some guys with spray on tans and towels wrapped around their heads are going to attack four hotdog stands simultaneously in London again? Or are they going to OFFSHORE ALL THE JOBS, STEAL MY IRA MONEY AND RAPE ALL MY DAUGHTERS? Oh wait thats the Republicans..
reply
inketolstoy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The Clinton's are Republicans?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rainbowroosie says:
The intelligence community faces this type of criticism on a daily basis. If the community warns and operators take action, nothing occurs. Simply stated, when you warn properly the threat is neutralized. If you'd like to become educated on this aspect of intelligence, try searching the "paradox of warning." Bottom line: This is the way things SHOULD be. Intelligence professionals do their jobs quietly and nothing bad happens. Consider the alternative -- no warning equals casualties.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
thomasmc1957 says:
Too bad CBS wasn't telling us the truth about this in 2002-2003, when Bush & Cheney and their demons were lying to us 24/7 about Iraq's "Weapons of Mass Destruction."
reply
inketolstoy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CBS doesn't tell you the truth. Just their version of it.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Johnbrownbh says:
I totally do not agree with you. Because of the mentality of people like you make the big terror strike like Pear Harbor and 911 happened at the first place. This is the people we are talking about. Issuing a threat warning is better than no warning at all. You as the Journalist and Writer should carry the same responsibility unless you are in the other side of terror network? And like to turn down the threat? So people would not be awar of that and going with their normal life? That's when the terror strikes. Normal life and suddenly a big attack. To tell the public that this terror threat is just a noise is very irresponsible. Are you one of the Al Qaida sleeper cell?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tsigili says:
They are out there, looking for any opportunity, so don't kid yourself into thinking it isn't real, because it is.
reply
See all 12 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right