- Text
Corporate tax cut: Good idea, but won't stimulate economy
The White House is proposing to cut corporate income taxes from 35 percent to 28 percent. President Obama also recommends that manufacturers get a further cut, to 25 percent, and he wants to impose a minimum rate on foreign earnings to discourage the use of tax shelters. There would other less substantive changes as well under his plan.
The cut in the statutory tax rate, however, may not have as large an effect on the corporate sector as many anticipate. The reason is that this is intended as a revenue neutral change in taxes. To accomplish revenue neutrality, the cut in the tax rate will be accompanied be closing loopholes, i.e. a broadening of the base. Thus, every company receiving a tax break will be matched somewhere else by companies experiencing a tax increase. Thus, while some firms will benefit, others will get hit harder by these taxes and the net effect overall should be roughly a wash.
Obama to propose corporate tax cutTug of war over inflation at the Federal Reserve
Another way you think about this, as
noted by Jared Bernstein, is to consider the difference between the statutory tax rate -- the rate on the books -- and the effective tax rate, the rate after all deductions, loopholes, etc. have been exploited. The US has a relatively high statutory tax rate of 35 percent, but the
effective tax rate is quite
competitive with other country's rates (according to this estimate, it is 26 percent, about average for developed countries), The administration's plan would decrease the statutory tax rate, while at the same time increasing the effective rate for many firms by eliminating deductions and closing loopholes that allow firms to reduce their effective rates so far below the rate on the books. As Bernstein points out, these include "accelerated depreciation, interest deductibility, the ability to pass corporate capital gains over to the individual side of the code (where it gets favorable treatment), and a bunch of international loopholes, like deferral -- the ability to avoid U.S. taxation by holding multinational profits overseas."
Making the corporate tax system more equitable and more efficient is important, and this proposal takes steps in this direction, particularly on the equity front. Under current rules there is too much variation in the rates paid by companies that are very similar. However, since the proposal is revenue neutral, and is thus mainly a redistribution of the corporate tax burden rather than a cut in taxes, we shouldn't expect too much in terms of its ability to stimulate the corporate sector and the overall economy.
-
Mark Thoma Mark Thoma is a macroeconomist and time-series econometrician at the University of Oregon. His research focuses on how monetary policy affects the economy, and he has also worked on political business cycle models. Mark is currently a fellow at The Century Foundation.
Follow on Twitter »
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- Chilean copper giant Codelco CEO resigns
- Analysts: Europe bank run is under way
- Top 10 Places to Live in 2011
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- How to handle sexual misconduct at work
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- The holy grail of leadership
- Injury forces Michael McKean out of Broadway show
- Doctors report rise in kids eating detergent packs
- 5 Things You Should Buy at Costco
- Made in USA: 5 Great American Cars Made Here
- Can Tim Cook do what Steve Jobs couldn't?
- The new rules on dressing for success
