U.S. reportedly releasing high-level detainees in exchange for pledges of peace

In this March 23, 2011, photograph, a U.S. military guard watches over detainee cells inside the Parwan detention facility near Bagram Air Field in Afghanistan. / AP Photo/Dar Yasin

This story originally appeared in The Washington Post, and was written by Kevin Sieff

(Washington Post) KABUL - The United States has for several years been secretly releasing high-level detainees from a military prison in Afghanistan as part of negotiations with insurgent groups, a bold effort to quell violence but one that U.S. officials acknowledge poses substantial risks.

As the United States has unsuccessfully pursued a peace deal with the Taliban, the "strategic release" program has quietly served as a live diplomatic channel, allowing American officials to use prisoners as bargaining chips in restive provinces where military power has reached its limits.

But the releases are an inherent gamble: The freed detainees are often notorious fighters who would not be released under the traditional legal system for military prisoners in Afghanistan. They must promise to give up violence -- and U.S. officials warn them that if they are caught attacking American troops, they will be detained once again.

There are no absolute guarantees, however, and officials would not say whether those who have been released under the program have later returned to attack U.S. and Afghan forces once again.

"Everyone agrees they are guilty of what they have done and should remain in detention. Everyone agrees that these are bad guys. But the benefits outweigh the risks," said one U.S. official who, like others, discussed the issue on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the program.

Long slog ahead in 9/11 trial at Guantanamo Bay
Military commanders warned to get troops in line
Obama, Karzai ink partnership deal

The releases have come amid broader efforts to end the decade-long war through negotiation, which is a central feature of the Obama administration's strategy for leaving Afghanistan. Those efforts, however, have yielded little to no progress in recent years. In part, they have been stymied by the unwillingness of the United States to release five prisoners from Guantanamo Bay -- a gesture that insurgent leaders have said they see as a precondition for peace talks.

Unlike at Guantanamo, releasing prisoners from the Parwan detention center, the only American military prison in Afghanistan, does not require congressional approval and can be done clandestinely. And although official negotiations with top insurgent leaders are seen by many as an endgame for the war, which has claimed nearly 2,000 U.S. lives, the strategic release program has a less ambitious goal: to quell violence in concentrated areas where NATO is unable to ensure security, particularly as troops continue to withdraw. The releases are intended to produce tactical gains but are not considered part of a grand bargain with the Taliban.

U.S. officials would not say how many detainees have been released under the program, though they said such cases are relatively rare. The program has existed for several years, but officials would not confirm exactly when it was established.

The process begins with conversations between U.S. military officials and insurgent commanders or local elders, who promise that violence will decrease in their district -- or that militants will cease fighting altogether -- if certain insurgents are released from Parwan. The value of the tradeoff and the sincerity of the guarantee are then weighed by senior military officials in Kabul, officials said.

"The Afghans have come to us with information that might strengthen the reconciliation process," U.S. Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker said. "Many times we do act on it."

The insurgents released through the secret program are the only detainees at Parwan who are able to circumvent the prison's judicial review board. Their release is instead approved directly by the United States' top commander and top military lawyer in Afghanistan, U.S. officials said. One official described the process as being "outside of our normal protocol."

As opposed to the formal NATO-sponsored reintegration program, which forces militants to sever ties with the insurgency, the strategic release program does not require detainees to formally disavow their relationship to the Taliban, Hezb-i-Islami or other insurgent groups. In some cases, detainees are expected to maintain those connections and use them to further peace-building efforts between the Americans and the insurgents.

"We look at detainees who have influence over other insurgents -- individuals whose release could have a calming effect in an entire area," one U.S. official said. "In those cases, the benefits of release could outweigh the reasons for keeping him detained."

When the insurgency appears to be gathering steam in certain provinces, for instance, prisoners have been released to alleviate mounting tension.

• no previous page
• next

1/2

[audemus]

For these people, lying to "The Great Satan", is almost a responsibility. Their pledges of peace mean absolutely nothing.

[Lerianis6]

The Taliban believe that they were illegally removed from power in Afghanistan (which has some ring of truth to it by international law).

Of course they are going to be unwilling at the best to 'make peace' with a bunch of invaders.

[usunus]

Despite the brave words of the Obama administration on the Afghan war the release of the detainees indicates its desperation to come to some sort of understanding with the Taliban before they inevitably eliminate Hamid Karzai and capture power in Afghanistan as before.The U.S strategy is bound to fail because the administration differentiates the Taliban from Al Qaeda for its own purposes.

[Zann-Zel]

What happened to we don't negotiate with terrorist? "If you give a mouse a cookie"??

I don't like this - there ya go EmpireGeorge, there's One.

I think maybe they should release them Mission Impossible style, with that charge set to go off in their heads in a matter of hours after their release!

[Zann-Zel]

Why do you suppose Obama is so determined to take legal weapons from the American people.??
--------------------------------------
No one has taken any guns away from anyone!
The question on a medicare form is a total LIE! Look it up on Snopes or wherever you fact check, long as it isn't FauxNews!

And on this particular article - I'm hoping there's more to the story, to explain whats going on here.

[geezerdude]

This is the Obama solution. These terrorists will start right back where they left off. Killing our troops. Wonder how many American troops died trying to capture these people in the first place?

[smittyc]

I don't know why we are still there

[gregorio57]

I don't see how any good can come from releasing these prisoners. Our soldiers will just have to fight them again. It's idiotic!

[Lerianis6]

Apparently, you don't realize that we were invaders in Afghanistan. By holding these people and not leaving (since we are not welcome) we just incense their family members to join the Taliban.