Uproar over Limbaugh comments seems to cool

Rush Limbaugh.

This story was written by the Washington Post's Paul Farhi

The dark clouds hanging over Rush Limbaugh appear to be lifting.

Exactly one month after the conservative radio host sparked outrage by calling Georgetown law-school student Sandra Fluke "a slut" and "a prostitute" in a three-day diatribe, stations are standing by him, advertisers are trickling back to his program and the news media have moved on.

Liberal groups that organized petitions and boycotts against Limbaugh say that they intend to keep up the pressure and that they've had a lasting impact on the most popular radio host in America.

"The objective has been to show that there are real consequences when someone like Mr. Limbaugh or his company shows no accountability for his actions," says Angelo Carusone, who has been leading the anti-Limbaugh efforts for Media Matters for America, a Washington organization. "That is continuing."

At the same time, however, Carusone acknowledged that outrage is hard to sustain. "I think certainly the pressure has been reduced," he said. "To a certain extent, that's okay and acceptable. . . . Obviously, the intensity is gone, but the engagement remains high."

On Monday, the 600 or so radio stations that air Limbaugh's program were told by his syndicator, Premiere Radio Networks, to resume running "barter" ads during his program. Stations are required to run these ads in exchange for paying discounted fees to Premiere to air Limbaugh's show. Premiere, which is owned by radio giant Clear Channel Communications, had suspended the "barter" requirement for two weeks in a move widely seen as a way to give advertisers a chance to lie low while Limbaugh was in the news.

Limbaugh has apologized for some of his statements about Fluke, whom he attacked after she spoke last month in favor of mandatory insurance coverage for contraception at an event sponsored by congressional Democrats.

Limbaugh's advertising losses may have been less than media accounts suggested. While more than 100 advertisers told Premiere that they didn't want to be associated with "controversial" radio programs of any kind in the wake of the flap, some of these companies weren't regular Limbaugh sponsors in the first place.

Carusone said most of the advertiser exodus over the past month appeared to be among companies whose ads aired only in regional or local markets, he said.

"Contrary to the wishful thinking of the professional special interest groups, reports of sponsors fleeing the 'Rush Limbaugh Show' are grossly exaggerated. In fact, the program retains virtually of all its long-term sponsors who continue to have great success" with the show, saidRachel Nelson, spokeswoman for Premiere.

Another Limbaugh advertiser, plumbing-fixture maker Kohler, said this week that it would no longer sponsor Limbaugh. But that was the first such announcement by a sponsor in almost two weeks.

Limbaugh's recovering fortunes may be best exemplified by what hasn't happened. At the peak of the controversy in early March, two small stations -- in western Massachusetts and Hilo, Hawaii -- said that they would drop his program. Since then, no other station has said it will take him off the air, dashing the hopes of MoveOn.org, a liberal group whose ongoing petition drive seeks Limbaugh's removal from 180 stations.

Expectations that a weakened Limbaugh could be bumped by a new program hosted by former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee (R) have also not materialized. None of Limbaugh's many affiliates have said they'll move him from his midday time slot in favor of Huckabee.

Among the stations sticking with Limbaugh is WMAL AM-FM in Washington, one of several big-city Limbaugh stations owned by Cumulus Media. Cumulus is syndicating Huckabee's program, yet the company isn't moving Limbaugh aside for its own program on its stations.

In all, "the temperature of this controversy has finally fallen below the boiling point," said Tom Taylor, news editor of Radio-

Info.com, which covers the industry. He added, "I think the advertiser base is coming back."

Limbaugh got his first public endorsement this week from Clear Channel's chief executive, Robert Pittman, who had remained silent about his star host as the Fluke controversy raged. In an interview with the Associated Press, Pittman called Limbaugh "the king" of radio and said outrage over his comments was "part of the normal day-to-day of talk radio." The controversy, he added, has not had a major financial impact on his company.

With few new developments to drive the story, the Limbaugh episode has largely faded from the news. The relative absence of media attention figures to be a positive turn for him, as it enables advertisers to return amid less rancor.

But Steven Biel, director of SignOn.org, a Web site created by MoveOn.org for its petition drive, said the episode will make Limbaugh think twice in the future.

"I suspect his internal editing equipment is significantly amped up," Biel said. "I could easily imagine a scenario in which one more ill-timed comment will get him banished" to satellite radio.

[lesliep4819]

Honestly, it should come down to--if you're the sort of person who wants an undisciplined, mean, mouthy, morbidly obese drug addict telling you about personal responsibility--g'head. Everyone else, ignore the gas bag. He'll deflate of his own accord soon enough.

[amerilatino]

Cannibal Customer: How much are celebrities by the pound?
Cannibal Butcher: Scarlett Johansen, $20/lb. Phyllis Diller, $3/lb. Rush Limbaugh, $100/lb.
Cannibal Customer: I can understand Scarlett being so pricey, but why is Rush so dear? He's hardly good for dog food.
Cannibal Butcher: Are you kidding?? Do you know how much work it'll be to clean the sumbish???

[ericv8571]

We haven't forget, we are just waiting for NOVEMBER.

[justplainjohn]

How soon we forget

[raymailhot]

After all the comments about Barbara Bush, Condi Rice, Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann, the left has little room for indignation!

[truthforall]

There is a case to be made that if the petition to Limbaugh's sponsors succeeds, then his freedom of speech has been limited. Do the people who sign this petition have a right to do so? Yes. Do the sponsors have the right to decline to sponsor or continue to sponsor Limbaugh? Yes.

Consider that speech is a form of communication and as Limbaugh now has an audience of millions, then if the the petition succeeds, his freedom to communication to that audience has been lost and thus his freedom of speech has been limited. His audience has been deprived of his thoughts, loathsome though he may be, and his enemies have been deprived of what the other side thinks. Does he have an absolute right to broadcast? No. But that does not change the fact that his freedom to speak to millions has been limited, if the petition succeeds.

I personally do not believe that this limitation on speech should occur and, thus, I will not sign that petition.

[democracy8]

The 1st Amendment guarantee of Freedom of Speech only guarantees that the government cannot deny it. Private businesses are entirely free to do as they see fit.

[OweninNJ]

Hey, give him a break, its not like Rush ate a dog or something...

[amerilatino]

Nope, but when he talks, it sounds like he's f@rting one.

[plrbr]

HaHaHaHaHa, I just keep laughing at you commies! I read your comments and see the real hate. Hope & Change

[mjlewis6]

Not abated. I sure do not appreciate the sponsors or the radio station for spewing this hate-mongering idiot on the airwaves.
I am 63 and this brand of "journalism' or talk radio does not approach dialogue with the public but slanted hate-filled dogma of a political party pursuasion that is not only undignified, but very likely to the right and nearly a hate crime. How can anyone stomach this airwave pervert?

[DebbieCorona]

I don't know that it is the outrage has gone away but that the anger has been translated into action to be taken in the voting booth. I am still outraged over Rush's comments, I have already seen who supports him, who did or didn't rebuke him. I will use that information and outrage in the voting booth.

[luadda22]

whoopie, all the problems facing us at this time and you are worried that some insignificant, spoiled law student is called a name. It's women like you that vote based on feelings that have us in such a mess.