Horserace
July 23, 2008 10:23 AM

Starting Gate: Big (Media) Love

By
Vaughn Ververs
Topics
Starting Gate
John McCain is feeling neglected these days. While Barack Obama is off gallivanting around the globe and getting the kind of media attention usually reserved for an actual president, McCain finds himself struggling, not too successfully, to get into the storyline.

McCain's campaign tried to pre-empt Obama's trip last week by releasing an ad attacking Obama on Iraq and Afghanistan even as the Democrat was en route to the war zones. Yesterday, the campaign ratcheted up their growing complaints about the media's coverage of Obama by posting a Web video mocking the press and basically belittling those intrepid journalists traveling with McCain.

The frustration is understandable for someone who has been accused of being the media's darling for nearly a decade. Back in the halcyon days of the 2000 campaign, McCain was on the other side of the equation, basking in the media attention his bull sessions on the Straight Talk Express created. It was McCain, in those days, who the media seemed to be infatuated with. And the interest did not wane in the years after the election as McCain became one of the best-known fixtures on the media circuit.

But the reasons for the attention McCain has traditionally received from the press aren't hard to figure out. His personal story as a war hero and POW has always been a riveting storyline for the senator – one that his campaign uses often themselves. His bitter primary battle with George W. Bush in 2000 elevated his political position. Here was a politician frequently at odds with his own party on big issues, whether it was campaign finance reform or immigration reform. And he has been one of the most visible critics and supporters of the administration's conduct of the war in Iraq.

Surely McCain's campaign understands the interest in Obama now as the media – and the country – continue to try and get to know this new political phenomenon. Still, they seem to be hoping that, through all the complaints, they can guilt the media into providing him equal time. It's a strategy that might not be working out for them exactly.

There's new controversy arising from McCain's interview with Katie Couric for last night's CBS Evening News after McCain refuted Obama's insistence that violence in Iraq may have waned even without the surge, as was evidenced by growing cooperation of Sunni leaders in fighting al Qaeda even before the surge was announced. McCain disputed that, saying that the so-called "Anbar Awakening" was made possible by the surge, a contention that is being disputed by some. (You can read the entire transcript and watch the full video of Couric's interviews with both candidates at CBSNews.com).

The seeming flub joins a growing list of misstatements from McCain in recent weeks which are getting more and more attention. The Politico yesterday questioned whether his gaffes were a result of his age. The Washington Post follows up on that theme today and adds questions about whether McCain is getting preferential treatment. It just goes to show that not all coverage is good coverage.


Around The Track

  • Obama begins what could be the most difficult part of his trip today in Israel. His comments on the middle east peace process will be watched carefully.

  • Bobby Jindal made the rounds today on the morning news shows as speculation over the vice presidential sweepstakes swirls around him. McCain is slated to meet with Jindal this week but the Louisiana governor told the "Early Show" that he's happy with the job he has. ""I've got the job that I want... He's not going to offer it to me," Jindal said about the number two slot.

  • Did McCain drop a hint about Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty's future to a group of New Hampshire delegates or was he merely vouching for the man whose state hosts the convention?

  • "McCain is attacking too much and indiscriminately. The barrage undermines his brand, takes time away from telling voters what he might do for them, and looks awfully old-timey in a year when voters want a new brand. He should go on the offensive, yes, but in targeted forays." – Slate's John Dickerson, on McCain's new aggressiveness.

  • Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
    by qtpi1020 July 25, 2008 6:33 PM EDT
    I''m a fan of all the Obama love coming from the media. 236.com had a really funny comment on how even the people on McCain''s campaign must adore Barack. The whole feature is actually great-- http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/24/if_they_imd_barack_obama_and_t_2_7906.php.
    Reply to this comment
    by qtpi1020 July 25, 2008 6:31 PM EDT
    I''m a fan of all the Obama love coming from the media. 236.com had a really funny comment on how even the people on McCain''s campaign must adore Barack. The whole feature is actually great-- http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/24/if_they_imd_barack_obama_and_t_2_7906.php.
    Reply to this comment
    by pennres July 24, 2008 10:20 AM EDT
    And the spin goes on....fascinating how the writer blames the media infactuation with Obama on McCain. Really...drop the pretense....the media is in the tank. Wake up people....
    Reply to this comment
    by lottobee July 24, 2008 1:30 AM EDT
    You can argue all you want but Obama is still the phoniest candidate we''ve ever seen. He''s all over the place and you don''t know what you''re getting. Is he ending the war or is he stepping up the war????? For all the young people who chose Obama because they didn''t want to end up in Iraq --- you may end up in Afghanistan instead!!!!! Better figure that into your future.
    Reply to this comment
    by scootmandubi July 24, 2008 12:31 AM EDT
    Excuse me, did you actually have the nerve to write that the timeline of events regarding the surge and the "so-called ''Anbar Awakening''" was "a contention that is being disputed by some?"

    Who is disputing it outside of an ill-informed John McCain?

    There is irrefutable documentation that the Anbar Awakening began in 2006 and the surge began late in 2007. THAT was a factual mis-statement, which is why it was excised from the official CBS record.

    Please tell this viewer, who has now decided to never watch a single CBS newscast ever again, how the timing of the Anbar Awakening suddenly becamse a matter of conjecture?

    And, if it really is a matter of opinion, why did you alter McCain''s answer without alerting your viewers to that fact?

    Edward R. Murrow should be rolling in his grave right now.

    How shameful of CBS.

    And you still can''t admit the truth.
    Reply to this comment
    by oneamerican_ July 23, 2008 10:05 PM EDT
    Vaughn Ververs, YOU DO A DISSERVICE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH YOUR SLANTED, LIBERALLY-BIASED SCREEDS.

    You simply ignore the fact that has been verified by numerous military officers on the ground, including General Petraeus and Michael Mullen who have said consistantly that the "Anbar Awakening", as well as security gains thoughout Iraq COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT THE SURGE IN TROOPS.

    Stop spinning the facts to fit your liberal meme, or get out of the news business.
    Reply to this comment
    by notblue July 23, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
    This article is about the liberal medias bias towards Obama, it''s not about Iraq or any of the other political falshoods from move.on, what will the 67 percenters do when tghe hated Bush is gone? regain some common sense? time will tell. To give the democrats a free ride whe they all said the SAME THING about Iraq and Sadam is simply purposeful ignorance and blind indifference.
    Reply to this comment
    by mattcat25 July 23, 2008 8:08 PM EDT
    There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq (wrong!), the Conservatives have taken the American People for a long and wild ride around the barn to facilitate the diversion of $Billions of Dollars to the Private Sector.
    And Liberals too, they just have different pet corporations.
    Posted by olcottr


    There were NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ.
    There was no yellow cake uranium sold to Saddam Hussein from Niger.

    It was all made up, and lied to the American People to allow for the invasion and pilfer of US Federal Treasury Funds.

    Try the same old right wing tactic of %u201Cthe democrats do the same thing tooo!%u201D

    Lies and stealing from the American People isn%u2019t right, it%u2019 WRONG!


    Reply to this comment
    by tke919 July 23, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
    Maybe some fine folks on this site can explain why CBS violated it''s own standards in editing McCain''s interview.

    From your own Standards book:

    "Answers to different questions may not be combined to give the impression of one continuous response. In short, we cannot create an answer merely because we wish the subject had said it better."

    But yet that''s exactly what CBS did last night.

    Anyone care to explain?
    Reply to this comment
    by bigal321321 July 23, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
    Senator McCain''s gaffe last night on CBS News with Katie Couric was edited for sure. The question arises as to why? Let''s see.....hmmmm...could it be that the FCC dropped the multi-million fine from the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction suit? Nah, no self respecting network would do such a thing. Would they?
    Reply to this comment
    See all 28 Comments
    .

    Follow Horserace

    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook