Horserace
June 9, 2008 2:15 PM

Nader Shows Strength In Poll

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Ralph Nader
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll released Friday shows Barack Obama leading John McCain 49 percent to 46 percent among registered voters in a head-to-head match up – with the three point difference within the poll's margin of error.

But consider the results when two other candidates are added to the mix: When pollsters asked not just about Obama and McCain but also Libertarian party candidate Bob Barr and independent Ralph Nader, Obama led 47 percent to 43 percent, with Barr taking two percent and Nader taking six percent. Nader only took 1 percent of the vote in his last run for president in 2004.

Both Barr and Nader are potential spoilers for the major party candidates. Last week, as the Boston Globe reports, Nader, who is to the left of Barack Obama, sent out a fundraising appeal approvingly quoting novelist Russell Banks' comments about the presumptive Democratic nominee.

"Obama is feeding a dream -- a dream of change and renewal," Banks said. "He's feeding a dream that the conditions that surround us -- Iraq, the economy, the racial divide, the class divide in this country -- that they are magically going to go away by voting for this centrist Democrat."

"The Obama moment is a feel good moment," Banks added. "It makes us feel good. But the programs Obama is proposing -- up and down and all around -- are the same centrist Democratic positions. The same people are going to be running the show. All of the corporations are rapidly switching their contributions to the Democrats."

The fundraising appeal, after citing this comments, noted that "what wasn't mentioned was Nader/Gonzalez."

"So, let us say it loud and clear," continued the appeal. "Nader/Gonzalez. Shift the power from the few to the many. Free our government of corporate domination. Restore the sovereignty of an engaged people. Don't fall for the trick."

Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by seah5 June 11, 2008 9:30 AM EDT
That is sad.

It would be wiser to vote for a short term for McCain, a definite vote against Obama, than nadar.
Reply to this comment
by vincan-2009 June 11, 2008 12:47 AM EDT
Wow, 6 per cent, that is some mighty strength there!!! Sounds like he will really go somewhere just like every time before.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree4u June 10, 2008 8:44 PM EDT

Check out the Corporate/AIPAC powered stooges here wringing their hands at this challenge to their favorite stooge.

Oh, and Mr. Libertarian, you have a former(?) Republican failure as your candidate this year. Nice going.
Reply to this comment
by missglo June 10, 2008 7:18 PM EDT
When will his senile butt, disappear? Always providing discord. I wonder who''s behind his disfuntion.......
Reply to this comment
by gocubs58 June 10, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
briannorwood - A pineapple - OMG thats funny! ROTFLMAO!!
Reply to this comment
by midlifer June 10, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
Ralph Nader will not win the presidential election. And if he were truly concerned with the state of our Union, he''d work WITH the Democratic Party who purportedly share his beliefs.

His method of running against the Party, only benefits the Republican Party. And right now, The Republican Party is so closely aligned with The Communist Party, it''s scary:

The Republican Party...
Removing personal freedoms
Removing freedom of choice
Decreasing educational benefits
Invasion of privacy
Destroying the economy

The Bush Administration resembles a dictatorship not by coincidence.
Reply to this comment
by bfjones666 June 10, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
Libertarian is the way to go my friends. Ralphie is in it for his own ego but the Libertarian mantra of less government and no unprovoked aggression against others is what this country needs. The war is draining this country of it vitality and needs to end.
Reply to this comment
by midlifer June 10, 2008 12:42 PM EDT
CarlyLaine, I agree with your remark wholeheartedly:

"what we need is Congressmen and women who will treat that tax money as if it were their own then they wouldn''''t be so free in taking from us to give to the people who do not deserve it."

The Bush/Cheney Administration depleted our reserves to fund an illegal war. Why? Why would already wealthy people create an unnecessary harmful situation to increase their families'' wealth? Well, this time, oil people weren''t the only benefactors.

Rumsfeld and his cronies are in the pharmaceutical industry. He wanted Afghanistan.

Bush also aided a failing weapons manufacturing industry at the expense of our own domestic industries: Automobiles and alternative fuels.

Cheney''s Haliburton won a "no bid" contract in Iraq BEFORE the war was launched. ???

Yes, they took our money to benefit those who do not deserve it. Even worse, they didn''t NEED it. Themselves.

And they sold us to a Communist nation!

Between the years 2000 and 2007, these United States, once the most properous country, the richest country, the most powerful nation in the world,

has become indebted to Communist China in the TRILLIONS.

The data is online. Free. Read it yourself = http://www.treasurydirect.gov/
tdhome.htm
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood June 10, 2008 11:53 AM EDT
Like a locust, Ralph Nadar pops his head out of the dirt every four years to get his moment of fame.

He no longer cares about issues, he only feels this overwhelming need to stroke his hyper-sized ego.

And some people will follow along. He knows that and that''s what keeps him going.

I imagine if a pinapple declared a run for the Presidency, it would get 6 percent of the vote too!
Reply to this comment
by carlylaine June 10, 2008 11:40 AM EDT
MidLifer HOW''S ABOUT YOU JUST allow the effing government to tax you...you seem to WANT IT BAD...TAXES do not have to be raised...what we need is Congressmen and women who will treat that tax money as if it were their own then they wouldn''t be so free in taking from us to give to the people who do not deserve it. CONGRESS is the new Robinhood.
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments
.

Follow Horserace

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook