Horserace
March 4, 2008 5:36 PM

Early Exits Polls Indicate Economy Key Issue For Democrats

By
Brian Montopoli
Topics
Democrats
Here are some data from the early CBS News exit polls:

The economy was the top issue for Democratic voters in all four states voting today, and large majorities say the economy is in bad shape.

Ohio Democratic voters hold mostly negative views on U.S. trade with other countries: Eight in ten say trade takes jobs away from their state. In Texas, 58 percent say trade takes jobs away, while a quarter say U.S. trade with other countries creates jobs.

Thirty-two percent of Texas Democratic primary voters are Hispanic, according to the early exit polls -– up from the 24 percent in 2004. Eighteen percent are black, down from 21 percent in 2004.

In Ohio, 20 percent of Democratic primary voters are African American, up from 14 percent in 2004.

Obama is seen by voters in Texas and Ohio as the candidate most likely to beat the Republican nominee in November. A larger percentage of voters in both states say Clinton has attacked Obama unfairly than the other way around.

In both Ohio and Texas, a majority of Democratic voters say superdelegates should cast their vote based on the results of the primaries. A third say the superdelegates should support the candidate who has the best chance of winning in November.

For more exit poll results, see our main election story.

Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by hdinsight March 5, 2008 2:43 AM EST
Gene Sperling is Clinton''s economic adviser. That alone should be a valid reason for voting Clinton into the Oval Office. Read "The Pro-Growth Progressive: An Economic Strategy for Shared Prosperity" before believing Obama or McCain would save our economy from total implosion. His strategies led our country to prosperity in the past including a balanced budget & a reduced deficit. Let history repeat itself! Time is of the essence and we need the genius of Gene Sperling to help AMERICA out of this darkness.
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 March 5, 2008 1:58 AM EST
Big night fir McCain. With Hiilary winning, he has just won me over.

AND I had so much hope ealry on....
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 March 5, 2008 1:48 AM EST
Posted by yarow at 09:55 PM : Mar 04, 2008

Hey , work for FOX news. Stop spamming. We have seen your opinion over and over and over and you are an idiot.

Looks like this may make my state count after all.

Don''t know who to vote for if Clinton wins. Never voted for a Republican President in my life, but I cannot stand this legacy nonsense. What next? another Bush?

No one can win without FLA or Michigan. I don;t know how this can possibly get resolved.

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:22 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:17 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by elz523 March 5, 2008 1:10 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!
Posted by yarow at 10:03 PM : Mar 04, 2008

Again, there were no campaigns in those states. So... you really don''t know how an educated electorate would have voted.
Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 1:03 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:59 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by yarow-2009 March 5, 2008 12:55 AM EST
In the last two elections, Ohio and Florida have determined the presidency. Hillary won both primaries, and she has the best chance of doing so in November. The democrats should pick the candidate who can win the battlefield states!

Reply to this comment
by elz523 March 5, 2008 12:54 AM EST
If Obama wants to argue that party rules should be followed by not seating Florida and Michigan delegates, then he should endorse the right of superdelegates to vote for whomever they choose.

Posted by yarow at 09:43 PM : Mar 04, 2008
+ report abuse


What? Look I don''t care who wins. Whichever Democrat wins will get my vote. But c''mon(!), the candidates agreed not to compaign in Michigan and Florida. Y''know if we were going to vote without a compaign: #1, Hillary would win based on name recognition alone and #2, we could save alot of money by just going and voting without learning anything of the candidates. Is that what you want? Because that is what you are suggesting. If there was no contest in either Florida or Michigan, as agreed by the candidates, then you can''t seat the delegates as if there were one.

Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments
.

Follow Horserace

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook