SOPA supporters facing boycotts, thanks to Reddit
GoDaddy.com
(CBS) - Domain registrar Go Daddy faced a week of users jumping ship after members of the online community Reddit attacked the company for its support of Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
On Dec. 22, Reddit user selfprodigy declared on a forum thread that he (or she) would be transferring 51 personal domains to a different registrar to protest Go Daddy's support of SOPA.
Full coverage of SOPA at Tech Talk
SOPA gets protest song from British rapper Dan Bull
SOPA opposition from tech heavyweights Google, Facebook
The boycott proposed moving domains on Dec. 29 as a day of protest, but the topic gained so much interest that Go Daddy has already experienced a mass exodus. According to the Mac Observer, the registrar has lost over 72,000 domains.
"I am proud to announce that the Wikipedia domain names will move away from GoDaddy. Their position on #sopa is unacceptable to us," Wikipedia's founder Jimmy Whales declared on Twitter a day after Reddit users posted a thread asking for the company's support.
Ben Huh, who owns sites like I Can Haz Cheezburger and FAIL blog, announced the company would pull over 1,000 domains from Go Daddy via Twitter.
On Dec. 23 Go Daddy announced they would be changing their position on SOPA, but there hasn't been much meat to that claim. A good question to ask is why would a domain registrar support a bill that might hurt its own business.
Talking Points Memo reports that Go Daddy is exempt from SOPA. An amendment submitted by House Judiciary Committee Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) "excluded certain operators of sub-domains, such as GoDaddy.com, from being subject to shutdowns under SOPA."
The battle over the bill continues and now Reddit users are toying with other companies to boycott - among them Nintendo and Electronic Arts.
Aside from domain registration, Go Daddy is known for overtly sexual advertisements that feature scantily clad women. Controversy also surrounds the company because of a graphic video post by the company's chief executive officer Bob Parsons of an elephant killing and African villagers swarming the dead animal for meat.
Popular in SciTech
- Chinese supercomputer named world's fastest
- Airborne laser reveals hidden city in Cambodia
- Valentina Tereshkova: First woman in space 13 Photos
- NASA picks 8 new astronauts, 4 of them women
- "Tweet" added to Oxford English Dictionary
- Russian tycoon seeks human immortality by 2045
- Solar plane lands at Dulles Airport Play Video
- NASA unveils plans to capture asteroids














Also, GoDaddy has been making it harder and harder to move domains:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57348511-281/godaddy-accused-of-interfering-with-anti-sopa-exodus/
http://imgur.com/2PrR1
The media uses the general population to promote things. Some music companies leak their own tracks to the pirate world to get press and buzz going. This bill will not only hurt free speech but large media companies as well. If we are prevented from posting anything referring to any media company's material then they are going to lose a lot of free press. If this bill wasn't written by a bunch of people who have literally no idea how modern marketing works then maybe it would make more sense. All the corporations that are sponsoring this nonsense are going to be in a world of hurt when they realize the mess they have created for themselves.
Not to mention, if the government can control what sites we are allowed to go to what is to stop them from controlling sites they just don't agree with. We live in the United States not the People's Republic of China. Free Speech comes into question especially based on the extremely general wording of the bill that could encompass any site the government wanted it to. It disturbs me that this is even being considered.
There are legitimate reasons for using P2P networks and circumventing DRM.