Tech Talk
By

Charles Cooper /

CBS News/ February 11, 2011, 6:50 PM

Wael Ghonim: A "One-Off" for Silicon Valley?

Wael Ghonim over Egypt flag

Wael Ghonim over Egypt flag

/ CBS/AP

Wael Ghonim, the Google product manager who helped pull together the popular demonstrations that forced Hosni Mubarak to step down as Egypt's president, is the hero of the hour. But not everywhere. For many in Silicon Valley, he's their worst nightmare.

On the record, Google's not talking about Ghonim or the question of employee activism. For his part, Ghonim told CBS's Katie Couric in an interview on Friday that his participation in the protests had no connection with his employer.

"They did not know anything about this and actually when I took the time off and I went to Cairo, they did not know I was going to the protest," he said. "But when everything became public, I talked with the company and they suggested that I take a leave of absence and I also suggested that to them and I think it was a good decision for that. Google has nothing to do with this."

Asked whether he planned to return to the office, Ghonim said that he'd be honored to return to Google "if I'm not fired."

Maybe that was meant as a tongue-in-cheek comment. But there's a larger truth behind his quip. The key role played by one of Google's key executives in the Middle East revived a decades-old dilemma that many other technology companies face when it comes to the question of political activism: Where should they draw the line?

"It's one of those things that companies don't want to touch with a ten foot pole," a tech public relations exec told me on background.

The obvious truth du jour is that tech companies don't want to take political positions - even when regimes use their products to oppress their own people.

This isn't the first time the issue has stirred this debate in the tech industry. In the 1980s, the divestiture movement pressured American companies to cut their business ties with South Africa's apartheid regime. One by one, nearly every major U.S. tech company eventually left. The one notable exception was IBM, which argued that its policy of constructive engagement would give it more leverage with the South African government to treat black citizens more fairly. It's hard to say how many of the departing companies were spurred by demands for social justice. Most, it's fair to say, were trying to stay ahead of a political movement that threatened to take a toll on their bottom lines.

Complete Coverage: Anger in the Arab World
For the most part, tech execs are just like their colleagues in other industries in their efforts to try and steer clear of political controversy. This has not always been easy. In the last decade, technology companies have struggled with the question of whether to demand more flexibility from China on human rights and Internet censorship. This has sometimes turned into a political issue. A few years ago, Yahoo turned over information to China authorities which led to the jailing and conviction of a local journalist. (Yahoo was subsequently pilloried in prime time by a Congressional panel.) So far, most tech companies - with the notable exception of Google - have opted to go with the flow and not press publicly for change as a condition of selling technology to China.

If we were talking about plastics makers or fertilizer seed companies, none of this would create a stir. But the American counterculture had a strong influence on the nascent computer and software industries which blossomed in the aftermath of the 1960s. In "What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer," John Markoff does a nice job tracing those unique social and intellectual filaments connecting today's tech world to a broader conception of a corporation's responsibility. The book documents how the industry was created with the help of passionate people who wore their social conscience on their sleeves.

Fast forward and thus, the subsequent "Do No Evil" mantra from Google - it may sound kooky to the rest of Corporate America, but the slogan resonates, at least with many in the rank-and-file. It also opens up a Pandora's Box - this time, it's Ghonim, maybe tomorrow an employee in Beijing. That's a possible scenario that few management teams in Silicon Valley are eager to confront.

© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • Charles Cooper On Twitter » On Google+ »

    Charles Cooper is an executive editor at CNET News. He has covered technology and business for more than 25 years, working at CBSNews.com, the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.

12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AmrToukhy says:
Respect.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Local_Find says:
I agree with what ctthosting has said Google on Twitter has already said "We're incredibly proud of you, @Ghonim, & of course will welcome you back when you're ready - cf." it's great to see Google welcoming him back after he takes a break because it was a very important day in the worlds history.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jelpern2 says:
It's important to note that Wael Ghonim is not an employee of just any Silicon Valley company, he's an employee of Google. I wrote the following on my blog about a week about:

"I personally find it quite poetic that Ghonim worked at Google - the company that went toe-to-toe with China's censorship while the rest of the Western world meekly toed the line, finally turning its back on the largest internet market in the world in a decision that ethics were more important than business. Google's brand equity in my eyes just increased exponentially; while Ghonim is still quite emotional after being released from 12 days of prison, I would not be surprised if at some point he did not thank his superiors at Google for fostering an atmosphere in which ethics mattered."

http://jelpern.blogspot.com/2011/02/wael-ghonim-google-and-greatest-social.html
reply
emilymerkle replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Are you sure you're talking about Google? I read your blog post - you obviously are painfully out of touch. Yeah, GOOG made a great show of no longer censoring their results for China - but guess what? They did an about face and are again working with China to suppress knowledge and keep the Chinese in the dark because THEY NEED THE CHINESE AD REVENUE. Baidu is kicking their a** there, and they value $$ over "ethics". "Do No Evil" is an open joke in the industry, ethics are NOT fostered over revenue, and until people like you pay attention to the news - and not the Google PR or hype - they will continue to exploit - yes, exploit - any population they can (including the good 'ole USA) to boost their bottom line. Wake up, please!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
EllenLP says:
cmsmik - it's people like you who are scary. It's "Bing" not "Bling." I doubt that Google will miss you AT ALL!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Egypt4peace says:
What bone are you trying to pick? Google supports Wael Ghonim, and the man himself admitted on CNN interview w/ Todd Watson that he "works for the best company in the world". Also, Wael is not a "product manager" as you say but Google's director of marketing for Middle East & Africa.
http://parkerspitzer.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/09/tonight-8-wael-ghonim/

If you want to follow Wael Ghonim closely, text Egypt4Peace to (617) 394-1386 or see the TechCrunch story: http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/10/groupflier-egypt/ or MSNBC's story on GroupFlier.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TallieBear says:
I'm sure Google isn't afraid of a bit of controversy, and look at all the publicity the company has gotten over this event.

If he called in sick, then showed up at a bar, wearing an I Work For Google teeshirt, acting like a drunk and causing trouble, maybe the company would have issues with it. But he took time off to go be with his people, in a cause that hugely overshadowed any job. It was one of those life-altering moments that most of us will only dream of doing.

If Google is truly the great company that I've heard it to be, they will warmly welcome him back and life will go on.

And cmsmik, bless you for your opinion. Hope you enjoy Bling. Buh Bye now.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
TheClarkster says:
Did you even bother to ask Google what they thought before attacking them? They are proud of him and can't wait for him to come back safe.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ahmed_Saidawi says:
LOL @ cmsmik.....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ctthosting says:
Google just said on their Twitter account that they are happy to welcome him back.
"We're incredibly proud of you, @Ghonim, & of course will welcome you back when you're ready - cf. http://******/2BDGp"

https://twitter.com/google/status/36521734542868480
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
GoGreenGal says:
If Sergey Brin does not allow this hero to work for Google because of his activism after this ... well, shame on you Sergey. Just because the regressives are capitalists, you need to take a stand. I love Google because I know Google is progressive. Sergey, you need to have as much courage as Mr. Ghonim and fight for what you believe in. Please don't be a coward. Americans like me, and we are many, are really tired of the Conservative Capitalist agenda that is moving us toward a becoming a Third World Nation.
reply
ctthosting replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If anything Sergey would be happy since his family fled from the Soviet Union. However Larry Page will be the CEO and the current CEO is Eric Schmidt. And Google already said they will welcome him back.
See all 12 Comments