Tech Talk
CNET/ October 29, 2010, 5:50 PM

Time to Do Away with the Kilogram?

Locked away in a vault at France's International Bureau of Weights and Measures is a very important platinum-iridium cylinder. For the last 130 years, that cylinder has served as the base measure for the precise weight of a kilogram.

The International System of Units; Watt Balance

/ Steiner, National Institute of Standards and Technolog
Now the U.S. says it's time for a change.

To make sure the weight measurements were standardized, 40 units got made at the time. But a global effort is underway to seek revisions to the International System of Units due to changes in a unit's mass that take place over time. The upshot: a kilogram may not still be a kilogram. The degradation may also cause other problems that extend to potential inaccuracies in the definition of electric current and luminous intensity.

"In the current (system of units), it's not just the unit of mass that depends on the kilogram," according to an NIST statement. "The definitions of the ampere (electric current), mole (amount of substance) and candela (luminous intensity) ultimately depend on the platinum-iridium artifact. For example, a mole is currently defined as the number of carbon-12 atoms whose total mass is 12 grams," according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

The proposal thus is calling for defining he kilogram in terms of a different mathematical constant based on quantum physics.The proposed revision "puts the SI on a firm foundation," says Ambler Thompson, a NIST scientist involved in the international effort. "We get rid of the last artifact."

On Oct. 15, a committee affiliated with the International Bureau of Weights and Measures called the CIPM, passed a resolution to revamp the modern measurement system. The next step will be for an affiliated committee called the CGPM to consider the idea in October 2011. If the resolution passes, according to Stein, the new modern measurement system might be in place later in the decade.

"This is actually an advance in the science of measurement," said NIST spokesman Ben Stein. "This is the next phase. There have been discoveries in measuring the constants of nature, such as the speed of light, the amount of energy in a quantum of energy....we know them pretty well now. These numbers are not changing, so why not define the units in terms of these constants? They're from the natural world."

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
7 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Scimajor says:
Why not just go with the fact that 1 cubic centimeter of H2O (not tap water) is one cubic centimeter. Yes, I realize that this has been historically an estimation; a very precise estimation but just an estimation. Why not formalize it? It's true to something like 6 or 7 decimal places. The variation only comes due to this hunk of metal anyway.
reply
Scimajor replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sigh, I meant "1 cubic centimeter = 1 gram". Oops.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rwsmith29456 says:
Oh, and by the way. There is a standard physical bar for the meter, too. But it was replaced years ago by the emission wavelengths of Krypton-88 atoms. In other words, to most people, this new definition of the kilogram will pass unnoticed in the non-scientific world and be of benefit to areas of science which need such precision.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kenhamlett says:
Since the United States can't seem to make the change to the more logical units of measure that most of the rest of the world uses, they have no say in how weights and measures should be determined. Let those that embrace logic define the logical methods. That specifically excludes us.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dannysteele says:
Actually, we should NEVER use the kilogram as a unit of weight. The kilogram (or gram) is a unit of MASS (mass never changes regardless of gravity). The appropriate unit of weight in the metric system is the newton which is commonly used just for force.

In the Imperial system, the pound is also a unit of weight (and force). The unit of mass in the Imperial system is the slug. (This information is sure to impress anyone you relay this to.)
reply
incog-nito replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Every scientist knows this. For for most people, kilogram is weight for common use and practical purpose. And it works.
rwsmith29456 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
That makes another reason for using International System units. How many people know what a slug is or how it is used? I can't believe I still have to keep two sets of socket wrenches, one for SAE and the other for metric.