August 31, 2010 10:28 AM

Comet Impact Refuted as Cause for Mammoths' Extinction

By
Charles Cooper
Topics
In The News ,
Tech Talk

In the last few years, some scientists have put forward a controversial hypothesis arguing that one or more comets slammed into North America some 12,900 years ago, causing the mass extinction of wooly mammoth elephants and other large mammals.

This image from NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) features comet 65P/Gunn, taken on April 24, 2010 (just one month after its closest approach to the Sun) in the constellation Capricornus.

It came from outer space? Not so, says a new report.

(Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/WISE Team)

That theory has come under fire from other scientists, who have since put forward refutations of most of the evidence in support of the killer comet theory - except one - the presence of nano-scale diamond crystals. The comet school pointed to that as evidence of a cataclysm since the crystals could only have been formed under the extreme pressure of a comet impact.

Now an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) makes the case against the nanodiamond crystal theory as well. A team of researchers, led by nuclear chemist Richard Firestone from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, examined carbon-rich materials isolated from sediments from more than 15,000 years ago to the present. Their conclusion: No nanodiamonds were found. "Instead, graphene- and graphene/graphane-oxide aggregates are ubiquitous in all specimens examined. We demonstrate that previous studies misidentified graphene/graphane-oxide aggregates as hexagonal diamond and likely misidentified graphene as cubic diamond. Our results cast doubt upon one of the last widely discussed pieces of evidence supporting the YD impact hypothesis.

You can read the online version of report at PNAS. Also, Science offers a good write-up of the latest turn in the debate.


  • Charles Cooper is an executive editor at CNET News. He has covered technology and business for more than 25 years, working at CBSNews.com, the Associated Press, Computer & Software News, Computer Shopper, PC Week, and ZDNet. E-mail Charlie.

Add a Comment
by Myopinion046 August 31, 2010 3:08 PM EDT
An article I recently read said that radio carbon 14 dating isn't reliable earlier than 5,000 years ago. All that speculation that mammoths went extinct after a comet impact that many accepted as absolute truth sufficient to give up religion is now proven to be the unsubstantiated, speculative nonsense that it really was. Ah, the cycle of science proving religion wrong only to find out science is wrong keeps right on going along.
Reply to this comment
by nic1234567-2009 August 31, 2010 3:44 PM EDT
I don?t know what article you been reading but your very much misinformed. The upper limits about 10 times that. Because decay rate is logarithmic, radiocarbon dating has significant upper and lower limits. It is not very accurate for recent deposits. In recent deposits, so little decay has occurred that the error factor (the standard deviation) may be larger than the date obtained. The practical upper limit is about 50,000 years, because so little C-14 remains after almost nine half-lives that it may be hard to detect and obtain an accurate reading, regardless of the size of the sample. By the way, science is not trying to prove religion wrong. I consider myself to be a religious person and I have no problem with a much older view of the universe.
by rainbowroosie August 31, 2010 1:13 PM EDT
"Were the first researchers totally inept? If so, why was their position taken as "evidence" without immediate review? this has taken years!"

When I read this, I thought I was reading a global warming string!!!
Reply to this comment
by darwufche August 31, 2010 11:31 AM EDT
Were the first researchers totally inept? If so, why was their position taken as "evidence" without immediate review? this has taken years!
Reply to this comment
by rwsmith29456 August 31, 2010 10:56 AM EDT
Man, they've had TONS of evidence supporting the impace theory and now it's all wrong??
Reply to this comment
.

Follow Tech Talk

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook