Couric & Co.
December 15, 2008 4:48 PM

Behind The Scenes: Letting The Shoe Puns Fly

By
Mark Knoller
Topics
Behind The Scenes
Mark Knoller is a White House Correspondent for CBS News. He was one of the small pool of reporters to accompany President Bush on his trip to Iraq and Afghanistan.
(AP Photo )
It was President Bush's last trip to Iraq and Afghanistan – two places in which Americans were still engaged in wars begun on his watch – and a guy throwing his shoes was the big story.

The jokes on Air Force One about that incident Sunday in Baghdad were flying faster than those shoes.

Even the president couldn't resist – beginning an interview by telling reporters on the flight out of Iraq that he didn't know what the shoe-hurler was saying – "but I saw his sole." (Get it? Shoe sole?)



"It was a bizarre moment," said Mr. Bush, and with mock pride he trumpeted his reflexes in ducking out of the way of the airborne footwear. "So you weren't a lame duck," I kidded the president to the moans and groans of his aides and my colleagues.

Back in the press cabin: "I bet they'll be serving us "shoe-fly pie," said one reporter.

"We'll probably have to go shoe-less to the next press conference," said another.

We wondered if the shoes thrown at the president were "wing tips," and whether the Secret Service would issue agents a new manual on "the taming of the shoe."

And though President Bush was unscathed from the incident, Press Secretary Dana Perino suffered an injury. She was hit in the face by a heavy metal microphone stand that was swung around at her as security personnel rushed the shoe-hurler. It left her with a dark bruise under her right eye.

"Guess you could call that a shoe shiner," a reporter said later.

As so often happens on presidential trips, an unexpected event overshadowed everything else about the mission.

Thirty-seven days before his eight years as president come to an end, George W. Bush headed to Iraq and Afghanistan for the last time as Commander-in-Chief.

(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
For obvious reasons, it was a trip cloaked in secrecy and security. President Bush would be an irresistible target for insurgent forces in both of his destinations were advance word of his visits to leak out.

There were no lights and sirens on his motorcade as he headed to Andrews AFB on Saturday evening under cover of darkness. Air Force One was deliberately still in its hangar – so no one could see Mr. Bush as he boarded just after 9:00 p.m.. He was dressed casually – though the 43rd president was wearing his ball cap with the number "43" emblazoned on it. He was excited about the trip, and even made a highly unusual visit to the press cabin to say hello – something he never does.

All the window shades on the aircraft were drawn, and the lights that usually illuminate the familiar exterior of the most recognizable 747 in the world were turned off in the hope the plane's take-off at 9:32 p.m. would draw as little notice as possible.

There was no "Air Force One" call-sign on the radio for this flight. It was listed merely as a Special Air Mission: SAM 2112.

Those of us in the press pool accompanying Mr. Bush were secretly informed of the clandestine trip only a day earlier. We could each inform one executive at our respective news organizations, but no one else. We were instructed to arrive at Andrews about 7:00 Saturday evening, entering the base by an obscure gate that is almost never used and looked closed. The Secret Service confiscated all our photographic and electronic equipment including still and video cameras, cell phones, Blackberries and recording devices. Even an innocuous and inert thumb drive for storing computer data was taken away from me. We would get it all back on the plane once airborne and well out of U.S. airspace. Among the things they didn't want us photographing was the inside of the Air Force One hangar; it's about as secure as the White House itself, with heavily armed Air Police in body armor guarding the facility inside and out. It's a gleaming white cavernous structure, large enough for two 747s. And I was struck by the cleanliness of the floors – more like an operating room than a garage for airplanes.

President Bush had decided some months earlier that he wanted to make a final visit to Iraq and Afghanistan. He denied it was a victory tour, though he repeatedly makes it clear he thinks both nations are on the path to becoming successful democratic nations.

He wanted to thank the leaders of those two nations who share his vision for their countries. And he again wanted to express his gratitude to some of the U.S. military personnel who still put their lives at risk to carry out his vision.

No way did he think that when the wars began in Afghanistan in 2001 and in Iraq in 2003, that the fighting would still be going on within days of the end of his presidency.

He concedes his Administration miscalculated in some of the strategies it pursued in both countries – but he prepares to leave office firmly in the belief that both wars were the right thing to do – and that eventually – history will bear him out – long after we've all forgotten about the thrown shoes.



FOOTNOTE: The first time President Bush made a secret trip to Iraq in 2003, I was left clueless in Crawford, Texas, where most of the press thought he was at his ranch celebrating Thanksgiving with his family. The reporters left behind came to understand the need for secrecy about the trip – but we certainly felt misled about the President's whereabouts and schedule. On this latest trip, those of my colleagues back in Washington were also led to believe President Bush was spending an uneventful weekend at the White House. On Saturday evening, the press office even sent out its perfunctory e-mail to the press – setting a gather time for reporters on Sunday morning – presumably to cover the president's usual trip to church and weekend bike ride – even though he would be landing in Baghdad at 8:00 that morning. For some reason, the deceit didn't bother me this time.

Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by harbinger09 December 17, 2008 4:12 AM EST
Saddam was responsible for the war obviously. He violated numerous UN resolutions, human right abuses, genocide, etc. There were numerous reason why the war started, not just ONE!! Fighting a war to make profit? you got to be kidding me. Blaming Bush for the economy started by incompetent idiots liked barney frank is laughable. harry reid and nancy pelosi have a even lower approval rating than pres Bush so get a clue. obama can do better based on what? The guy is a BSer. Take your own advice, pull your head out and get with reality.

Posted by USA-No1 at 01:17 PM : Dec 16, 2008



Don''t lie--Saddam was responsible for many things but we are responsible for the war. In an interview with Chris Matthews, Cheney stated that even if we had known there were no ''WMD'', he would still have gone to war.

Saddam never made Bush lie about yellow cake or curve ball, nor stand in front of the US public to wiretap and lie about labs, weapons, etc. Saddam never made Bush out agents or decide to invade--that was what we did on our own. Saddam never forced Bush to use WP on citizens in Fallujah, start torturing or ignore the GC-- or lie when the NIE reports came out --that was us. Saddam has his own sins, and we have ours--one of them is a war based on lies and all the blood, gore and dishonor that comes with it. There is no way to deflect that blame though neo cons keep trying, and trying.
Reply to this comment
by harbinger09 December 17, 2008 4:06 AM EST
Finally it is hard to give much respect to the posters on this site when they feel that disagreeing with a president is ground to be disrespectful. Clearly they weren''''t brought up by folks with any understanding or ability to impart common descent behavior to their offspring. Sad to say that in this area our country has sunk pretty low common courtesy and descent behavior/respect for others is not common anymore.

Posted by gscotth at 11:50 PM : Dec 15, 2008


Other articles state that the man who threw the shoes had most of his family killed due to Bush''s decision to launch a war based on lies and that the man himself was imprisoned by us in a while.

Given Cheney''s statement today that we would have started a war in Iraq even if we had known there were no WMD, I think it is safe to say that Bush is lucky that what was fired at him were shoes and not bullets given the slow SS response.

After all, how much respect would YOU have if the leader of the foreigners who came and destroyed and occupied your country, destroyed your family and imprisoned/tortured you was within reach? Bush may be a hero to some but to many (including many Americans) he is a war criminal and a joke worthy of NO RESPECT.
Reply to this comment
by harbinger09 December 17, 2008 4:01 AM EST
No matter our President''s politics or mistakes, I believe George Bush is the first American President to be treated with such obvious contempt by someone from another country--and it be "caught" on tv. Let it be known that America is no longer respected--and that the loss of respect was inspired by Bush and his admin.
Reply to this comment
by parrots21 December 16, 2008 4:28 PM EST
Blaming Bush for the economy started by incompetent idiots liked barney frank is laughable. harry reid and nancy pelosi have a even lower approval rating than pres Bush so get a clue. obama can do better based on what? The guy is a BSer. Take your own advice, pull your head out and get with reality.
Posted by USA-No1 at 01:17 PM : Dec 16, 2008


I was to hasty responding to you before - be rest assured it''ll never happen again. Dumb Repug!
Reply to this comment
by parrots21 December 16, 2008 4:27 PM EST
Posted by johndevinejr
--------------------------
----

Saddam was responsible for the war obviously. He violated numerous UN resolutions, human right abuses, genocide, etc. There were numerous reason why the war started, not just ONE!! Fighting a war to make profit? you got to be kidding me. Blaming Bush for the economy started by incompetent idiots liked barney frank is laughable. harry reid and nancy pelosi have a even lower approval rating than pres Bush so get a clue. obama can do better based on what? The guy is a BSer. Take your own advice, pull your head out and get with reality.
Posted by USA-No1 at 01:17 PM : Dec 16, 2008


Dude, this is 2008. GET IT ????
Reply to this comment
by krescera December 16, 2008 12:49 PM EST
Al-Jawahari has called Barack Obama a house slave.What kind of public response has this comment received in the so-called Arab street?We have not heard anything at all.But now the "shoes" are being celebrated equally joyously by the MSM and the Shiite terrorists.
Reply to this comment
by wtlib December 16, 2008 3:03 AM EST
The shoe-It was Bush and Cheney''s fault, Oh Pailin was also in on it. Everything in Bush and Cheney''s fault. I lost my keys once-that was also Bush and Cheney''s fault. We can blame the "bad" president for everything. Who are we going to blame when OBAMA the great takes office.
Reply to this comment
by chetthor December 16, 2008 12:59 AM EST
The president was quicker with his joke than the secret service was in putting their foot down on the shoe thrower.

POTUS... size 10

thrower... zero

secret service.... no show

and the reporters... friends with POTUS in the end.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 15, 2008 10:49 PM EST
Ask yourself the question, "How would you like for someone to make fun of you"?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jtaylor710



Calm down.

Surely the dufus is used to it by now.

LOL!
Reply to this comment
by erich_1-2009 December 15, 2008 10:26 PM EST
Yes, that is regular for a Leftist like Ms. Couric.
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments
.

Follow Couric & Co.

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook