Couric & Co.
September 29, 2008 12:20 PM

Bush Administration Adds $4 Trillion To National Debt

By
Mark Knoller
Topics
Field Notes
Mark Knoller is a White House Correspondent for CBS News.
(AP)
With no fanfare and little notice, the national debt has grown by more than $4 trillion during George W. Bush's presidency.

It's the biggest increase under any president in U.S history.

On the day President Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.727 trillion. The latest number from the Treasury Department shows the national debt now stands at more than $9.849 trillion. That's a 71.9 percent increase on Mr. Bush's watch.

The bailout plan now pending in Congress could add hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt – though President Bush said this morning he expects that over time, "much if not all" of the bailout money "will be paid back."

But the government is taking no chances. Buried deep in the hundred pages of bailout legislation is a provision that would raise the statutory ceiling on the national debt to $11.315 trillion. It'll be the 7th time the debt limit has been raised during this administration. In fact it was just two months ago, on July 30, that President Bush signed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, which contained a provision raising the debt ceiling to $10.615 trillion.

Deputy Press Secretary Tony Fratto declined an invitation to comment on the enormous jump in the national debt during Mr. Bush's presidency. He referred me to OMB – the Office of Management and Budget, which tried to make the case that as a percentage of the economy, the national debt is not that big.

In its budget documents in February, OMB estimated that next year's national debt would hit $10.4 trillion – which it said would amount to 69.3 percent of the gross domestic product – the standard measure of the size of the economy.

That's high – but far from an all-time high. After World War II, the national debt soared to over $270 billion – a quaint figure by today's standards. Numerically, it's less than the amount of federal deficit we now run up in a single year. But back in 1946, the Debt amounted to 121.7 percent of the size of the total economy.

By the time Richard Nixon began his second term in 1973, the national debt had grown to $466 billion – though as percentage of GDP, it had fallen to 35.7 percent.

Today, OMB press secretary Corinne Hirsch, renewed the oft-made government argument that reporters should focus on just that part of the national debt that is held by the public – now about $5.6 trillion and not include that portion billed as "intra-governmental holdings" – money the government owes itself – especially the Social Security and Medicare trust funds.

Of course, the government doesn't have that money either. It's been spent.

President Bush made that point himself on April 5, 2005, when he paid a visit to the offices of the Bureau of the Public Debt in Parkersburg, W.Va.

He was shown a white file cabinet with keypad locks on each of its four drawers in which the Social Security Trust Fund is stored. On that day, there was no cash – as he noted in a speech later in the day.

"There is no 'trust fund,' just IOUs that I saw firsthand, that future generations will pay – will pay for either in higher taxes, or reduced benefits, or cuts to other critical government programs," he told an audience at West Virginia University.

The government didn't have the money it owed itself back then – and still doesn't.

A couple of weeks after he took office, President Bush addressed the Republican Congressional Retreat in Williamsburg and declared that his budget "pays down the national debt."

In recent years, President Bush almost never mentions the national debt.

Add a Comment See all 75 Comments
by just-hope January 24, 2012 8:03 PM EST
I am not an economist or anything but I know Bush is the reason for our extremely high deficit. The Republicans do not want to talk about this so they can blame Obama. the Republicans have become dirty and stupid.
Reply to this comment
by kasjun February 1, 2012 10:01 AM EST
Then how do you explain that through 8 years of the Bush administration the worst deficit was 450 billion and since Obama has taken over in has not been less than $1 trillion for three years and is predicted to be over $1 trillion for the 4th year of his presidency?????????????????????????????????
by msm495 January 21, 2012 9:11 AM EST
I have followed Presidential history for 50 years. In my lifetime there wasn't a President of lower intelligence than Bush.
Reply to this comment
by AnnaMosk January 23, 2012 10:34 AM EST
Ive been following "commenters" such as yourself on the internet since its inception and there has never been a person with lower intelligence than you. Except your children, the "Occupiers" How many other things are you wrong at in your life? I am sure you are a broke, poor loser who has never accomplished anything of real significance in your life. I am sure of it.
by dsr4468 August 24, 2011 10:49 PM EDT
It would be so nice to get some honest information from our news people. Because lies are now being touted as the truth, I have been double checking everything I read and hear and this article by Mark Knoller proves that I have not been wasting my time. Manipulating information to reach a particular conclusion is dishonest no matter who is doing it. Will we see a retraction or a clarification? I won't hold my breath. http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/655009/media_malpractice%3A_cbs_pins_bush_debt_on_obama/#paragraph3
Reply to this comment
by fryemtn December 29, 2011 7:52 PM EST
Thank you.. 100% correct..
by circus2 August 13, 2011 10:57 PM EDT
Ok, we all know Baby Bush was not the best President by any means.
We know he left us with a hefty debt, But why are we rehashing this.When I first read this column I thought somebody had mad a mistake and put in "old" news. Let's get on with and live now and
look forward to the future and quit living in the past and blaming
past presidents. He's now doing what he's good at, socializing at
the ballgames.


s
Reply to this comment
by SJames6621 August 17, 2011 5:32 AM EDT
No its important to understand that clinton, for all his faults, left us with a govt surplus and paying down the debt.

Bush not only created the worst increase in our history, but his deregulation policies let the repubs / tea party people on wall street make billions in bonuses, while destroying our economy with the mortgage scams.

Also encouraging big biz to move overseas, further undermining govt revenues.

And then there is the war based on lies. Iraq a trillion $$ wasted on BS about WMDs. The real clincher I read a few weeks ago was the repubs actually market tested various reasons for going to war against Iraq. WMDs won out. None were found, the Israelis did the job back in the 1980s by blowing up the osirac nuclear reactor.

And now the tea party repubs dare to blame Obama for the ecnomic mess we are in.

My son in law is Japanese and lived there until about 1990. He told me that when their economy crashed about the time he left, it took ten years to begin to unravel the mess.

the tea party repubs are blaming Obama for the mess they created.
by redkcir-2009 August 11, 2011 7:50 AM EDT
CBS must be scraping the bottom of the barrel. This is OLD NEWS, NO LONGER FACTUAL, and shows they are no longer interested in presenting stories constructed with true journalism, but becoming a left leaning version of the Esquire or the World News.
Very Sad Day.
Reply to this comment
by euge005 August 13, 2011 8:26 AM EDT
How is this no longer factual? If somethiong is a fact today, it remains one tomorrow, duh. Besides only 4 trillion and a war of aggression that murdered over a hundred thousand in Iraq, so what. The GOP would borrow more than that and kill more people as required to keep those tax cuts for the rich and the handouts for big oil. And now a new cretin from Texas wants his turn at the treasury money trough. Pathetic.
by fryemtn December 29, 2011 7:53 PM EST
I can't watch CBS anymore. Liberal Media.. Tell the truth.. please.
by govmess August 8, 2011 6:06 PM EDT
who care what bush did...what obama does is what counts and he is clueless. the only thing he knows is how to go from the oval office to the golf course. a leader steps up to the plate and calls his subordinates together and doesn't let them leave until a resolution is made...he can't find thetime to do this as he sees campaigning as more important...."I hope" he says...enough for his hope. "We all knew"...well if he knew why didn't he do something weeks ago....Why didn't Obama speak out on Friday after the S&P announcement...that's what a leader would have done. WHIMP
Reply to this comment
by euge005 August 13, 2011 8:32 AM EDT
You are so completely wrong and clueless. Bush destroyed this country for a generation. It will take that long with responsible moderate leadership to recover, but since our voters are morons we see the tea party win the House. They are the danger being financed by the same handfull of people that benefitted from the war in Iraq and bought off Judge Thomas. But have to admit Obama is a wimp, just an honest moderate one that is vastly superior to any of the pygmies in the GOP trying to derail our recovery.
by missileone August 16, 2011 10:36 AM EDT
Thats right who cares what Bush did.Lets start with Uncle Ronnie.He only increase the debt by 199%.
by carolo43 July 29, 2011 2:41 PM EDT
I am beyond disgusted with this Tea Party. This debt ceiling should have been a simple request as it is for every President. But the Republican­s added their own agenda's into it creating this huge problem. The debt ceiling should have simply been raised and THEN they should have gone to work on the debt reduction. They are so worried about those loop-holes but how much will the rich loose when the stock market crashes and their interest rates all increase?
Reply to this comment
by euge005 August 13, 2011 8:39 AM EDT
The tea party types are white trash that do not have investments so why would they care if the economy, the country and the international markets tank?
by carolo43 July 29, 2011 2:40 PM EDT
Let's not forget that in addition to what was left by Bush, he also blew thru the surplus that was left to him by Clinton. That is not even in the count. Starting Medicare D with no way of paying for it was of no help and tax cuts during war time is totally dumb.
Reply to this comment
by clarenceswinney August 1, 2011 11:16 AM EDT
NO ONE WILL LISTEN!!

5% OWN 63% ALL WEALTH
2% OWN 50% ALL FINANCIAL WEALTH
120,000,00 WORKERS OWN 7% FOR BANANA REPUBLIC
70,000,000 WORKERS GET 13% OF TOTAL INCOME
7,000,000 (MANY GAMBLERS) GET 50% OF ALL INDIVIDUAL INCOME
AMERICA RANKS ABOVE ONLY TURKEY-PERU-MEXICO ON EQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND WEALTH
AMERICA RANKS ABOVE ONLY ICELAND IN THE AMOUNT OF GDP TAKEN IN TAXES FROM CORPORATIONS
AMERICA GIVES HUGE TAX CUTS TO GAMBLERS WITH INCOMES OF $4000 MILLION-$3000M-$2000M ETC
TOP 70 MILLION PAY 13.65% TAX RATE
I AM FED UP WITH THE TRIPLE A PARTY THAT IS
ANTI CHRIST ANTI AMERICA ANTI WORLD

I AM FED UUP WITH LEADERS WHO PARTICIPATE IN THIS RAPE OF THE MIDDLE CLASS 70,000,000 WHO HAVE HAD NO ABOVE INFLATION PAY INCREASE SINCE 1973

WILL YOU TELL THE PEOPLE? WILL YOU?

cswinney2@triad.rr.com Lifeaholics of America (work for a Life not just a Living)
Achmed madmadmad at Inequality in America
Achmed wants to march in the streets
by user9876 August 17, 2011 10:11 PM EDT
One inconvient truth that the left always says is that Clinton left Bush Jr. a $300billion surplus. The Fact of the matter is that Bush Jr. in his first year before he enacted one of his tax cuts the US had a $50billion budget deficit.
by JonnyChepe July 28, 2011 6:31 AM EDT
This is a totally BS article. Bush was in office for 8 years. Ombamma 18 months. Do the math. Typical AP and CBS leftists propaganda. Sorry I found this page.
Reply to this comment
by lami987 July 28, 2011 9:57 PM EDT
Yes it is a total BS. Bush more than doubled our debt in 8 years. On top of that he blew away Clinton's balanced budget and surplus almost instantly after he took office. When Clinton left office CBO estimated our debt will be all paid off by 2009. Fact is every single unfunded republican tax cut led only to more borrowing and debt. Bush wasn't the originator of unfunded tax cuts but Reagan(R) was. He and Bush Sr. mmore than quadrupled our debt in 12 years. Before Reagan our debt was $900 billion, yes it's billion. Moreover, inspite of frequent presidential briefing of possible terrorist attack on US soil Bush did not do anything to try to prevent it instead he started 2 unfunde wars. At the end of his presidency US economy was so bad he had to start the first phase of bank bailout.
by euge005 August 13, 2011 8:42 AM EDT
we are too, you obviously did not learn anything in those 8 years of lost chances.
by uberpossum July 27, 2011 1:30 PM EDT
I would much rather see rich people (job creators) with a tax break for a corporate jet than see a fleet of Escalades and Navigators with 26 inch rims parked in front of the local welfare office.
Reply to this comment
See all 75 Comments
.

Follow Couric & Co.

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook