Couric & Co.
February 27, 2008 12:52 PM

Good night, Mr. Buckley

By
Ward Sloane
Topics
Late And Great
Ward Sloane is a CBS News producer based in Washington.
(AP Photo/Lou Krasky)
Please don't take this the wrong way.

As I read the first wires on the death of William F. Buckley this morning, I thought how appropriate that he should die during the year that the conservative movement seems fractured, a shadow of its once formidable presence.

Buckley was conservative before conservative was cool. He was brilliant, Ivy League, handsome and very, very, VERY articulate. And he was, well, so very self confident. All of his talent and style combined to rebirth the moribund conservative movement in this country. From his founding of the National Review to the day he stepped down from moderating his signature talk show, "Firing Line." It is fair to say that Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich all owe their place in American history to the man who once famously wrote that he didn't know anyone smarter than himself.

Ronald Reagan was the man who is most associated with making the "L-word," that is, Liberal, a dirty word. But it was Buckley who first started mocking and ridiculing liberals as being out of touch with mainstream America. Eventually he demonstrated through thoughtful and forceful debate that conservatism could not only survive, but thrive in the American marketplace of ideas. There are others who contributed, but Buckley was the vanguard.

In a way, it's sad that people like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage are today's mouthpieces for conservatism. What a far leap they are from the quick witted and smart Buckley. I think it's fair to say that even Buckley's ideological enemies admired him and respected him. That's because Buckley was not a hate monger; he was a serious-minded person who made reasoned and rational arguments for his cause. No apologies to Limbaugh, Savage or their listeners and adherents—they are no substitute for Buckley's class and intellectualism.

The conservative movement in this country is badly in need of somebody who can make a point without demeaning and demonizing liberals and moderates. Surely there are better "uniters" than Ann Coulter or Bill O'Reilly. Are there any conservatives who think that the Limbaugh-ization of conservatism may have something to do with its fractiousness? After all, one man's hate is not necessarily another's. This is not William F. Buckley's conservatism.

The inability of conservatives to unite around a candidate before the primaries started this year is testament to the decline of the right. By the time Mitt Romney became the candidate, it was too late. Even he couldn't unite the right. In 2000, conservatives overcame misgivings about George W. Bush's lukewarm anti-abortion rights stand to unite around one candidate. If he were running this year, I doubt he could turn that trick again.

Good night, Mr. Buckley.

Add a Comment See all 18 Comments
by severow February 29, 2008 5:35 AM EST
It would be good to see American conservatism renew its partnership with intellectual ideals and classical learning rather than distinguish itself only through a lamentable disdain for all things ancient.
Reply to this comment
by clintus01 February 28, 2008 4:13 PM EST
Liberals made Liberal a dirty by stupid pointless, baseless, and mindless things like Barak being made because someone used his last name. no sir you are wrong, and before you throw some basesless argument out there like they do at the NY TIMES
Reply to this comment
by clintus01 February 28, 2008 4:11 PM EST
He wasn''''t a hate monger but he made liberal a dirty word?
He gave his opinion, thats all. The hate mongering and idiocraty is poeple like Obama ashamed of someone using his middle name. Buckley was a great man who gave OPINIONS based on FACTS. The decisive baseless mud slinging by so many mindless people taking sides via the media line of demarkation. No sir, you are wrong. Do your homework and give some basis before you throw things out there like they do in the times.
Reply to this comment
by pghlori February 28, 2008 3:45 PM EST
Congratulations Mr. Sloane. You seem to have gotten under the skin of the drug-addled, hate-mongering Limbaugh. He is whining about your post on his show.

I have to admit though, I think your post is entirely too complimentary to Buckley. The only difference between Limbaugh and Buckley is that Buckley had a better vocabulary.
Reply to this comment
by clintus01 February 28, 2008 3:34 PM EST
umm..Buckly was called a hate monger, he was called a racist pig, he was cursed at and heckled back then the same way he was now. Liberals have been hateful and spiteful back then like they are now. we are witnessing hillary and barak turning on each other. Dont blame rush limbaugh, he voice in shaped by the opinions of those who call in. This is what scares and drives the liberal media about rush limbaugh. That one day the liberal man behind the green curtain will be discovered. So much information is available now days that agenda''s can be uncovered quicker than ever. Broad sweeping strokes, like Mr. Sloans are being made all the time without an regard for fact or history. I remember watching Buckley on sundays with my father when I was child and things are not much different now than they were then. If there are hate mongers, or people attacking people for their beleifs, look to yourselves. Watch the news. The only group on the attack, is the leftwing attacking the right for "claiming" that we are on the attack. How idiotic is that.
but heres the thing. The war at the top (government) has gotten so out of control, we the people have been phased out. I would love to hear some honesty. We dont need change we need structure, we dont need hope, we need accountability. This country is a giant toilet waiting to be flushed by dems and rep''s alike. At what point do we get our country back
Reply to this comment
by armandog2 February 28, 2008 1:49 PM EST
"Now listen, you queer. Stop calling me a crypto Nazi, or I''ll sock you in your ******* face and you''ll stay plastered." Buckley to Gore Vidal - 1968

Now that is conservatism.
Without Buckley there would have been no Goldwater, no Reagan, and no America as liberals and their incredibly ruinous polices would have destroyed this country - as they still aim to do this day.
Reply to this comment
by armandog2 February 28, 2008 1:47 PM EST
"Now listen, you queer. Stop calling me a crypto Nazi, or I''ll sock you in your ******* face and you''ll stay plastered." Buckley to Gore Vidal - 1968

Now that is conservatism.
Without Buckley there would have been no Goldwater, no Reagan, and no America as liberals and their incredibly ruinous polices would have destroyed this country - as they still aim to do this day.
Reply to this comment
by gitarfan February 27, 2008 10:11 PM EST
I thought Sloane was way off base about Limbaugh. Perhaps he should listen to him instead of relying on what the NYT writes about him. Sloane should also learn to write. When is it appropriate for someone to die? What a poor choice of verbiage. WFB would chew him up and spit him out for that. Of course a liberal with a capital L writing about WFB ranks up there with Hitchens writing about the Pope. I hate everything he stands for but he was a smart guy just doesn''t cut it for me. As vincefg shows, the left is far more vengeful, vile and slanderous in its language than the right will ever be. I think it''s very telling that Huffpo closed the comments on their story about WFB. Sloane should save the sermonizing for those that need it, liberals.
Oh and skeezix, you don''t know jacksxxx about Buckley.
Reply to this comment
by lnicx February 27, 2008 9:30 PM EST
Thank you CDS for non-publish button. You are to be congratulated for a brilliant blunder.
Reply to this comment
by lnicx February 27, 2008 9:28 PM EST
He was deboair. He was a wee bit egotistical. He know what he was all about and he didn''t mind telling us. He was also self-deprecating, but at the same time he had s sly wit that could strike like as surely as a finely honed knife. I loved him. I hated him. In the end i learned to respect him for who he was - a rare and highly civilized creature, the likes of whom I shall not meet again in my lifetime.

Rest in peace, William Buckley, srest in peace.
Reply to this comment
See all 18 Comments
.

Follow Couric & Co.

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook