Here Come The Judges
Here is an example. "I want you, the voters, to know," the candidate told the crowd, "that I oppose abortion. I support having the Ten Commandments in our schools and courthouses. . . . I support the Second Amendment right to bear arms. . . . I believe marriage is between only one man and one woman." Nothing particularly unusual about a stump speech like that, right? Except that the candidate happens to be running for a position on the Kentucky Supreme Court. Rick Johnson, the High Court candidate from the Bluegrass State, makes no bones about where he stands (and how he will vote if he makes it to the bench) on the most contentious issues of our time. It's a tactic that is growing more and more popular around the country as laws and rules that once prohibited judges from campaigning like regular politicians have eroded or simply been overturned.
And while some judges like Johnson are on the ballot this election season, judges as a whole have become major campaign issues and even the subject themselves of ballot issues. In Colorado, for example, conservative politicians are seeking to impose term limits upon the state's appellate judges—a move that would force the removal of nearly 70 percent of that state's Supreme Court judges. In Hawaii, there is a big ballot fight over mandatory retirement ages for judges. In Oregon, there is an initiative that would create "voting districts" for judges to give residents a chance to have judges who better reflect their own values. North Dakota voters will be asked to limit the power of judges to rule in and on certain child custody cases. And from South Dakota comes the granddaddy of them all—a measure that would allow citizens to sue judges (and even force them to jail) over unpopular decisions.
Judges clearly are becoming more political—candidate Johnson is not alone in his willingness to pre-judge issue that will come before him as a judge— so perhaps it is no surprise that the art and act of judging is becoming more politicized. If judges are going to act like politicians, more and more voters seem willing to treat them that way. You can decide for yourself whether you think this is a good trend or not. Me? I think it's a disaster. The more partisan judges and judging seem, the less respect and authority judges will get when they issue unpopular decisions. And the ability and courage to make unpopular decisions is what judging is all about.
Good luck on election day when you have your chance to judge the judges.
- Iran's new president-elect seen as bridge-builder
- Couple's steamy romance e-books save their home
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship; Couple reeling from recession publishes novels
- Couple reeling from recession rewrites story, publishes romance novels
- Snowden: "U.S. Government is not going to be able to cover this up"
- 6/16: Protesters seek refuge in Istanbul hotel; Pope blesses Harley Davidson motorcycles
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship
- Mayhem in Istanbul hotel as protesters seek refuge
- Colo. Black Forest fire has died down, yet danger remains
- Syria tensions make for chilly meeting between Obama, Putin
- Crucial early education program badly hurt by federal cuts
- Parents of mentally ill child may have averted mass shooting
- A golfer's journey from tee to shining tee
- For child cancer survivors, treatment comes at a cost
- Pope blesses thousands Harley Davidson motorcycles
- Ghost army: How a group of artists helped win WWII